19730529 TZHC Mwanza
- TT S e r OJOt JeTO UI 9 T Tqm OsnOq et pes oq i iJOttU2 pi qq.cIcTnsut xo stt wrtj Aq eptui RTP09aTTr uotues3JdeJ OS op o. urçt peMocuçesrqj. JOtflp) OOUOptA OU STX1 SUOT. E3T[1. ACInOOO oq. Wnf poO[t' q. uopuod et oupTi.o 9lqT ut tiur uots.rts ou sr aJ9qT i motl 'MeTdeu sTq qnq joq , .ojq etq. TOTTE)s eq. 'rqs t...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19730529 TZHC Mwanza
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 1973
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
- TT S e r OJOt JeTO UI 9 T Tqm OsnOq et pes oq i iJOttU2 pi qq.cIcTnsut xo stt wrtj Aq eptui RTP09aTTr uotues3JdeJ OS op o. urçt peMocuçesrqj. JOtflp) OOUOptA OU STX1 SUOT. E3T[1. ACInOOO oq. Wnf poO[t' q. uopuod et oupTi.o 9lqT ut tiur uots.rts ou sr aJ9qT i motl 'MeTdeu sTq qnq joq , .ojq etq. TOTTE)s eq. 'rqs t rtd o uoqsuo(woo A'd o optw aq lr ou prioo uuTedc EsTlOt ?Tfl UT UP St pOt? 9t 6 ItflOJq sUPUOdJ et. .ucq JOE TT OS eqq ut '.xo ' qu'puodsu u' SM esrtotj 3fUTTfl. Oq. UOSOJ pt .UTACtJ T OU tICUdC3 9t 'tfl UUIOW)UJ et. wo.xj .nddi 'JAMOI pnoM T j 'upuodsr aqT oq. uott?sudwoo U14U?J J.O'il .xo suosrx et' oq aw o wes q.Ou p -riD -314 114TRu9T eqxeptsuoo eouptAP Ot. oox 011 T40MTT I uqnT-oTvWx oq OdSAJ totlw qt 0 9 s u a fto s 1 u0ptocIs.x G qT v i'q sz: esnou.j ouj. eq.ndsp Ou ST 9JOtJ 1 UOIt?SUdWOO AUC O p9tqtui qUOpUOdSJ OtT SCt uottJu)ptsUOo JOJ ITO T.OTt(M 1dd JO spuuO.x OMD. eis Je - eOuePTAP IU 0 Tl-TPP TIO O IVJS709U Ou st rc PT ctr r OJ -rT'-t s'id T ou PTP vqw a~ rkj O .TWwtq xOJ iudcI tfl. UTn2JtD UT 9uTST.ICJnS OtI ST q-T PU' O'JJ tl1fl. Oqew t3M UOTOtId( OU IADtOtt 'pTOOOJ Et[u. WOJJ SW)PS t''P TTO oq. w -ctt !OIIt OU tDT1D qinoo qOTJStp ei. sutidwO queddu eqq. sqoOAiDD STTT iVq PTTJ puu umicap WiDPUJOW)WOtfltII 1V2 SM tUJflf UOS sçq OUJ. qtTfl UOtVdflOOO UT Iuopuodsaj E) ,qq. 9UTAVE)-[. 'w ino OqP3AOW SSOUTM ewtewos .XOJ OSiDOtI UT teOqpftt S. Prn-I Saqfl JJV -T uc o s-notl8. qjq upuodso )T.fl pU Jo eooçd et. pupqo pvq (ssoup e) etr ' ~ Ptlq, PeTJ14S 11 sSeUflt4 ? St? G OuOP T A9 OA0 UTSSTtH '.00JJ 3WS t.fl O. uq OAVIT o. JdCT9 PTnOm eOUOpTA SZ'Mcr 8SflOt etfl uinq uITudd7 jo OU STh e.xetfl roTo ueq DAuq OT sweos CH 'uueq. v sc esnoi fT eqq /cJn000 oq. s O4T uTJVs xowoj euq 'wn peuooddt' ptJ q.UtD1TCddE Otfl pUC rumr PTfl. PTE'S ett UCttM JSd UT 1VTUO flO StT. eoq rper 'uwpeq eti uepuocIseit o. poTho[eq T tfl e.3peTMOUD Ou PI °H '—/oL o s qs jo urns u io; uwptiet{ etq exojeq wtt o esnot otq piosppqVuMf pIT° uxOs LSUTSflH tfl. s. eotzejep s urtecId et.. 'qUepUOCTS3J etfl. JO COU9 bW UT oStott ett;. peitht000 oqm, utoDsnH 'euqoq s j qunpuodsej eta. Aq peueeq pvTqpOOqs @s-notj Btfl. OTtF. ijo pu JO eOCTd Ctfl Ifl. sOSSeUTM eset JO eOT1ptAe eifl. WOJJ s j u addr q.t 'JeAet&oH tId cq ospi piw wtr .xo; esrtoq TTq PT Ot iVq peJOd(IflS sum eSflQiJCT4 tT: pj .tiepuodse etq. 4JJ 'euO TOuo tnq puu 9snoll er petstOwOp 2UTAT4 .UCTCdd pUT; O. iUO JOqT SJJ iDOQp pOU1T491 efj )T0Sr8Ttt O. pu0Tj.P O. qfl0 TOAVJT O. Eit UCtJM ITWr qi UT PCATI uoit pooflOo TflEM &SflOt S I.-TTnq et uq esto S L W9PUOdSJ I qUeJd e eQuetj 'p'TWSTP 8M: UOtSOOP qEtfl WOJJ ttOO 9 TJSTP deq SqT pUO OSPOU u JO oocseJ;1x'ç -/ooTs;° .uirts tD'ZOj 4rtoj — .2 'NVPTNOf et Ut ti11dd etjq. pens c-tTtjsS000ns quepUOcisJ et Jim- (JJIuTcTd tutto) q ... • -9r yrlyT O/ WIH'TI 107 aNOdrT* • . SflSJ8A ........................ S . •-.-. S (UpUOj tuttIo) . . . -. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ..•. . •0 •• • . . .. Ll 0M esr ITc3 .xnbc rwTJd rnwi (oL-61 ;o cJ9 ii eoj L6i; 0 L1 O .- OTI " bS Tttun fw u- JO JflO3 qOIJqSt JO uottoep eu WoJff) TTAtO Ut iDM1j tD- TL6I d o V9 ON ddV rIIAIO (od) ¶PZVT O HOISt !iI I . relationship could be. gloanod.Be thates it may, it aas immaterial that the appellant bought the house in good faith, for Juma not having had p any authority, axprosq.o1 iripIied, the purported dale was criminal and invalid,sothat the pro,ort'y could hot pass It follows that he as not entitled to Lemolish ti a house and he bhould componsate the rsponent - for the damage that has sultcd, fi other ground of ae&l is in rspLct of the amount awarded for wibh4r Matetriba said, certainly correctly, that there was no basis. It is tru,e the sum claiffid in th plaint ras shd 1300/-0 However, no vience ms to have b-en adduced in order to assess the compensatior , to é pia. In the event thi,coutf&nds it impossible to say if it was fir and just to award the sum of I . 1300/—. In the cirumstances, there is. no, aLte.rnativebut. 'tow r-umit' th-al cid iaidk to the primdry court to haV. the partics and call evidence in relation to the value of th' hbus'e and its contents., and then to proceed to make an award. It is so ordered. To this extent only epElhl is alloweh. Ho&ever, I make no order as to the costs of this ppa1. The rLspondcn1.shp11d bvc thL costs of proceedings in th. br or courts. (p. M. J01THiN) Junch 29/5/73. • ':.: -