19731005 TZHC Mwanza

Mt OOq. 9flt9-[OO siq 3ItTtt 30uot. OL1q. optAoJd O. StM et. wo.t; •qtctu 6 zr.1 sq tTqq, put '&xoqqo . o. ztd t sum uTedc' n- quqq. ptei i uot?aIp uo;p 3t pqo9C.X put Uotno9soJd o j0 OOUOptA9 p3d9oOz, q.,moo luTal aqq. 'J9AeMOj 'poait sassauqtM uoqnosoid etq. we poueddq t qtiq patuop put. X9tM So )UIJp t IOJ poddOs pUtt 9iT p2tjq. pttS °H w vao:jvq tuJnr 30 asnotT 9 StM oil uoqM Is0aiv 8IT q.0 DOSTJcLIflS sttt ai pts utitoddt at 'oouojap sti uj stm 't put gajTux otq. .u'p - ot TIIS SVM °H OSfl0I4 9T 30 tt0 OWtO quvllOJJc Oqq. put 'peuowwns StM eoiio ai. '.io.op otq. ueclo qou pno utI; zq. s tzot twnr o. t svm quT-TTOTd-c oip •puno qs t woI3 utpooq srr.t uttvctidwoo oqj ?9STL0tt:ptt$ 9T. 0OUI pU0 Oq sv qMUTTOcT fJV Oqq.. UOOØ PtTT all 3SflOt OWtS atq. pa o1dt .UtUTt1(IZiOO o :j 9 ot. e;ttpowwt ptrr tti1eddE D1fl 30 .xnoi&tteq sitp. MtS OFjnOT siq apiSnO StM 0M ioasurnc 'esnot ut estuit peooi qut1addt L-jo3jvq ieumf jo asnotj OU oq.ui put ptmodwoo otjq. tno.xt. ut..r ut1ed1t a ut -ttacTft oqq. petto - oj all •wop, jo ouo uo ot.xuaouoo ° Pi °-T -'4 'sto 9 AtD all AvMt WLI oq. utIoq 99T41. put q, ,eq —putt sflIp9q?4tSen2eaj0o sTT1 put IwTij poqqts put ajpnt_peonpod ut'ITO'ide Ot '&tMt Lma o. poquttt aiT uouj •snoioiJns awtoeq 9XT put 'tsnq aiq spJto. wtq 3100 9qqq. 'wotq pat.o - oj aq uotsa352ns toittM o. uott eOtIod Ot. oq. w - Etj MO•ttO3 p - n0I8. IVaT put 8.1001330 aOlIOd 9J0M iq wrq poq. &atm tT all 90 .It[ WOJ3 fl uijjattjq J03t asnoq siq o. otq UT1tM SL-M oq wat ¶t(qtcl uojt utsstct StM ot Ac iutt.j past put 'uuttj pO(IcTos IcaT.I •9.10SnO.1! 30 .1ttJ 9tT Jo aoocI otq a. Ut.. 5utq pits ututt1dwoo qqj euo -1!pajTP a.tsoddo et WO13 1uip9900i'J OJOM RaT L 'uosad abut' •trt t-ac1dt q.u OT4. qew et. uet9oio.nj pauttuoo t(oflM tq—putt[ t mçt qtM DuTgaito put t 1.fl0.Ii. "11TH OpU )n SJtM0 Pt1 StM '(1'd) .ututtdwoo a. 'iL6t 'jaquiao 9 a So iVtp tq6 ° ''' cl 09 .noqt rpuat oq SIM .ou pip a pe.sotpui 9 tj st uasqs se .utaJdt oTqndo - uapuodsaU tT .103 paJtaJdt 'atqt 'd Z DI p0UJt8 I 0T •.IapJO put eouauas 8Uoi0iAU00 .Suttt all.'utuit -Cttwoo °' '(i) twnr ttqst oq. uottuoJoo se 1Ctd o. put . (L) uaAas .103 uou1uostJdwT oaf peoueuas StM all 09JOqqoa JO pe.otAuoo put tM p61tqo StM JjHcjDj IIJIvw - ° r 'mi —'ia (uoJnoaoTd prNIDIo) • S E• S S S •. S S • 5 0 5 S LNaNOdS3H 0I'1fld! HIi (cTIsnDov rIVMIDIHO) IJ2NkjlLHVX , L&VTr2ddV LIDVI LNHctI1 'DIflfiN V 'H UO VZNV!W J J3IHLSIt VZNVMW O Hf1O0 aoiwict HLL do tL61 .tO O9trt ON aSO nIVMTWIHO 'PTNIDIUO '?L61 91 N 'IV'EEda1T NiJiIIHO NoIoIrIHnr 91vqrM1Ldjv VZNVMW LV VINVZNITI IO J1flO0 HOIH HILL NI '\ - , - 2- the hand—bag and the money, and, therefore, he was equally guilty of the charge. . In hispètiion fo..ajpea1,he contended that the evidence was unreliable and ,thcrcforetho trial court erred in accepting such evidence. That,ti.o absence of,the money on his person and the non production of the lloj1 knife riised considerable doubt, as it was most unlikely that the rioney would not have been found on him and the knife produced in court bc that been the true versionof the incident. The money., shs.250/=, was not found on the appellant.- The're was considrabledoubt as to whether the complainant had or had not mentioned te taking of the. llcd shs.25O/r to J.m' Bakora or the Police Officer (W3), but this was not material because, in his defnce, the appellant conceded that the complainant had, all long, been alleging that he had robbed him of the money... It may be that the appellant did not then state specifically mention the figure of sl , 25O/ • although .h:..complainan id,d, that he did SO.: ., However, this ws nOt an impotant discrepancy since the chargend th evidence also disclosed that the handbag and its contents were robbed.• It was not essential that the appellait should bc found in possession of money:or the other items becase the evidence showed that his part consited of applying violence 'hTlc his colleague took away the goods.. In law he was equally responsible since they aäted together and with obvious common intention. I would agree with the appellant that the kife wasiiot ed ted in court and there Was no explanation for its.:.no;1ci.ng produced. The omission is, however, harmless, since tl3erewa.pverwhelming evidence which showed that even when the appellant came out of the house of Baiorti still h0ld a.blood stathed.:kife... The witnesses would nothave said so hd they not seen that. I see, therefore, no valid reason for finding that the trial court erred in acccptng the rosccution ,aence. I see no merit in the appeal againt conviOtiOn. Th€. scntcrce of sen (7) years is the minimtrn provided for by, law. ORDER This appeal is tismissed in toto. Delivered in Couit at Nwanza on the 5th of October, 1973. 2 ' MWANZA (z. N. E-KINDY) 5th October, 1973 JUDGE. Appellant - Absent. Mr.P. Ntabaye - State Attorney for Republic. ,.g ..., •