19760414 TZHC Arusha
•••• ST1If1T iq poqaodd-ns sq 00Ia0j O T iAI?pT;i I? GO piflotis 110 Lions 'Lr0IqI?.oflij 014 1o[thlo i o oo :i 314 C'CCI-4 pTT ou soop IiO3 0 'O CLO, IJI OlilpI OOJJ 0T4 O qonpnoo 014 C2TI110 ITO O1J'JUr Si TOOT Uffl LII? • LT1 ITo(Tjo 014 ;o SOUCTIC TJI 5 014 UEpJC 00.1 ! T JIJXI?ETJI? 50 0TOOTJ05 pOc. T?LfI?cO'O1...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19760414 TZHC Arusha
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 1976
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
•••• ST1If1T iq poqaodd-ns sq 00Ia0j O T iAI?pT;i I? GO piflotis 110 Lions 'Lr0IqI?.oflij 014 1o[thlo i o oo :i 314 C'CCI-4 pTT ou soop IiO3 0 'O CLO, IJI OlilpI OOJJ 0T4 O qonpnoo 014 C2TI110 ITO O1J'JUr Si TOOT Uffl LII? • LT1 ITo(Tjo 014 ;o SOUCTIC TJI 5 014 UEpJC 00.1 ! T JIJXI?ETJI? 50 0TOOTJ05 pOc. T?LfI?cO'O1 'T '.TITO. 0 0t4 q no CrTJCfl 0TI OT 110 0 O L'fl5 Li T 14 Pj000j : 01I? STI 1 1fl I OTio 019 O o 'cia ToJ 11 1 11 OTCLI?11O qLI?TC4 r- qu 001.1 s T i0000jJ PI?TJ o 014 C CP.:n1ro Ol.To '01. pn: 019 -P1zooptm 51 4 T1T4 P0111111 OTf I?TP i1T'I0(iCT11 ST OT T110J;dI? IC TrOT111 - 014 1T[ nTic4 019 Aqso 0J5 Lr11[Toc(jt ot:m. . STTT11Th Po°J11I.ro C OIlS P1111 11O 019 POOCTQsTp 4fl T.TOTTpJ O311j flSC; pI?-0PjI?ro ITT LTOTIUOOSGO- J 014 o11 IC IJOCIJuS JCL ;'OOLippio OJO\ 140 pLr - 0JI?Lf0 0114 RqTnP pOpL.OTJ OLTCI[1Or (TI? - q 11C4 01101 pJ000j Cc I?0cT? OTLJq. ?LtT.q0npn3a JO; 004 S P0ATCoo GA11UftTYTI -r 011 T'T.4 .coLTon 11I? 'TTo(rcT11 014 punJ1oI °1 opiaop pIOo 011 11110 SII no pijn. 14 LTI? pocTor s r ornc rv SCTJ IC 14110 CA11 0 0 0LTI?J00 tIr - q JOlmj OTT p01110 p sq TUocIJ2 BTl0. 0't4 S0.TTTOPOJ 0 0 T STIr 11111 no p080:T oon000 OTTO JLTTAJ5 2000 11 SpITS 1)19 08 - rJ.... o oq qncaI? snuck T Ofl L6I OLmf 1 ?1T 019 110 qor U'OTOLTO5TjJTrT SJI?0( rLTOILr; 014 Ieptrn 14 POOnOOTOOs poll? OpOQ II?LT0 014 O 8/0 OISLTJ 0 TOII?3 JO 001J014C 5110 TOTA 0TJoTp 3T4 TO moo OTJ1GTP 014 III Tj 9T14 LIT LT 11 P 01A1100 p1111 p011I?ITQ ST?CA 0 500 TT0 11 0 IllJ 'T rTT11 O0T5nf jO hOT 1 0jOTTO 0 T3 019 OT DiTFTp 3114 LTTPI?[OD TI?PLrrL ST IO0 8 TLI 11TTTJO00.1J0J T?CJ rTq .PtiTphiTo'J-oytn. 11qtro •r o TUO 1.I5JoJcI T1LC1n 850 P11114 OTOuS oq . snto 01155 019 11 0 J0111 . 1100121 CJIII TT0TTJM 008110 LT12TJ 42L oraLoo 1In1 11 0110 XTtro ST 8114 I L6T I?TTO 019 001110 500 oons noqi t111 TTT 0 cft JOJ 01l?00Apr 12qolo 014 OJfl0 7 114 O S0I?tpIToo 14 01141? 11314 POOf 80110 0TLfd?ü10 0hITpuToTrr 8 1CTTOO 1? Sn000Tm1: 'L6T JOqI?oAofr '96T cotris inoo 5114 5 JO1 0 C PtrTpuoJ T000q 0121f Lf01t9 C11? PlO 19 ST ST1fJ .L rP(Sfl1 (Jonosso I12TITTJ0) JiIJQI TOJftf OT'I[flIj fl1 SflE)JOA (pasnoor iJ12U1fToiQ) ' rrI1Ir1rr(in 1412 5112f F -°T1-STCt •bs a' f)O?:iO)i 1117 IOTiJICr ' P0fup flflf)fIflG1I . 1-i F oa O IfJfOQ lliI1f JO L61 LO • Q1Trc4 rQ rfT43 I rTIDITo L6l JO PT Op P7411V %[LTIHO WTI1OO IPDIH fJI 1TI 41 1IOIdIçF0Iflf ITsJrr 1T-DMVL I'7 .T,Th Li). jW LELJ 1r- , TTT 0T WCI_IOL) fj JJ CLCW 2'- T1aio o not boon do in tii c e t case aa tc cs1 ] prsu ption hab he rcccoLie i tn.. Ic r court arc proper therefore staiid. It ollos th.: t tl.16 conviction • cannot be faulted.. ' The ajpol1aat. Jivjcvor tatd iin adi..ittinij ,thO facts that I stole th,; siaeçp to feed ay fa!ñly". The question to consider is whether, this ao.ounts to apocia1.toasons'fox inposi a sontnco lessor than the nihniun sontonco prscri1ed under the .Jininun Sontelicos Ict1972, sncc '.tho' value of the stolen sheep did not exceed s.lOO/= as prov±d•o under S. 6 of the Let? s corrc ctli conc d b Lir. ila Learned Sth be , Ltt':rnoy, necessity, though net a dofenoo to• a crininal 'Y chare, is a good nitiatir circuotanco and can be considered to be sufficient special circunetanco for inpoSin a lesser sentence provided the facts Chow that tho accus"ed, stoic cub of nocessiti. In the pres,ont case, there was nothinto su'est that the accused stole thc. sheep out of necessity to iced his Ianliy. For all tna-'is known ho could hav'. stolen th,. sheep so thet his fanily could .f east on the neat. I agree thoiefc that no special circuietances wore shOWn 'in this case and the legal nininuje sentence applies. 'The, trial court apc:aro to hvc thougit. that 'the nlninuci was 3 years. T1ns is 'v'ron • 'ihc nininun prescribed by law is 5 years inprisoinont. I will t2crf ore. and do now sdt aside :tho sentence of 3 years and substitute a senbonco of 5 jors ai1 iiC die is.. the ap,co. --/L • C.-'' (F. L. NYALILI) LG. JUDcTE. Delivered in open Court tllie san daj of 14th L,ril, 1976 at Lrusha in the presence of Lir.y, State Lttorno. FLN/TPIJ. fl LCT. JUIYJ!.