19770603 TZHC Mwanza 1
SJOJflCT otp. 'pxto o 3SS8JPP8 61 tX! 'E'9O O (Mrrj .TstJt;rsrl 8tO tlOtTo) oou IcJOA UDATZ9 os oj;oo snqOa uo jo sq ot jo Ra 9 AT TOP pup 06 07W /W sTq q !~ Tm 8JOtfl POA T JJP na P r q 9L61/OT/T JO UtUJOW et4. U UMO. S qo 3fn q WOIJ 8811W IVXtS CWOS O.IU3 8uticng etp MG T AeJ p01tep e GYSW o. esoclojcl .9ITJ 9t...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19770603 TZHC Mwanza 1
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 3 June 1977
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
SJOJflCT otp. 'pxto o 3SS8JPP8 61 tX! 'E'9O O (Mrrj .TstJt;rsrl 8tO tlOtTo) oou IcJOA UDATZ9 os oj;oo snqOa uo jo sq ot jo Ra 9 AT TOP pup 06 07W /W sTq q !~ Tm 8JOtfl POA T JJP na P r q 9L61/OT/T JO UtUJOW et4. U UMO. S qo 3fn q WOIJ 8811W IVXtS CWOS O.IU3 8uticng etp MG T AeJ p01tep e GYSW o. esoclojcl .9ITJ 9t utoq Stt1. pup pi2u &qJT1$ st fltJ. eq. J.S eoueptAe eq li 'pJ?OçJ OT 913 pJO[ 803JOD ! v31 T Axp,',:,l uvj, O. pup ciooj Otfl. S13 P9 .TUITq dO)t1[ O J9J9.Z 1ItM I 4teq xo AUJOj4T q qp 1S 'tlAOJ sayl iVq paqu9soadai 9PM otqrtcIe OtTLL s.UTteCTP xeqqo eq. ;o OO(8J ut APS o. SP J OM eotu ewos pq OSTP OTTM 'OPOOt.p 'OTr'MW *aI4 A'q p txesci SPM 'nTot?g SIPOCTCTP eq. Jo Otfl V T1OwpflC s1tq UT P0.PTT 0 9U 0 0 ext SIPOdcTP 91 3t "P 9 1 9UPTTOddP Oq .eqtotcTdt ereuM S T j U9JJ n 0U00 U1UUThX 93OU4tT8S Ou '9qU!100 SUT JO t9P8 UO .U8WuO91.IcLW1 • s9 99Jtfl JO S90UU3S PepJUMV 9P.X$tPtU TvTaq. OtILL •O41TbOP OIOM OT.M 'saoqtI.Ifl. s 1 flJ1Dc 'SUOSJ9CT JeqO tqq. pepnoI;T ptti uroo st stqj, 'pJtof[ 093303 p3fT AUP.9r UUJ,.etfl. JO ecToc ' =/oo'cTt 'stis tPen1PA 90JJO0 JO sq o1 eqq eo.s icet. awts oq. uo tq pits stt.t .I 's.titTtOd(t TTs P 8 P1OUT t0ttTM 6 J9U. JO Ot!O tIflO0 PJTTT T I .tIflOO Stt UO paq.OIMIOO 9XTW19 9PM OH 8flJ-Ufl 90 O. pTrS 9PM tXTPP q0t7M '093309 Jo sP. sq 0?1 pO/VE900J ptt eq PT 9OtI AIOAT19p t uo 9O.IM Uo.qtJ[ 'queut JPITWtS tflTM put 'tp eWtS etr. uo peeTTt Sum .I UtUflO00t aS I PS qu9jrpnuaj xeqout 9PM put OUOTP UO3.TI POUJOOUOO UflO9 ptT0099 OtTJ, '.UflO9 S1U. UO p0.0TAUOO 9PM °H 9tUt eq o. PTUS sum qoj 99JJ00 jo stq oT PeJeATTOP PStl 06 ozr A/w MOtS O. PuT.jod j nd iet9e.i 9LP S , dO 7 ncr P Ut 1V.i.ue UP eptw eq O. U0UT 19L/01/1 UO p e?;) Tlp SUM 9p03 ttieg eqq. jo (q)Li S/0 R UT T LT',1000 n eS-rtJ TualnpnTaj qqtM perrqo sum 9UO .tP UPtWPc[ unoo j.SJTJ Sq UI .UflO0 eeqq. JO p9q91SUO9 axqo et PS9n '1' TP OtZO JO &oxd Diql. tiq eq 06 OZW '°H 'A'JJol 9.PATZCT P JO J9ATJp P SUM 'pttttj JOtflO OT. tTO t1JpP '.1901330 UOt0flpOJd U SUM tio.tTt.Iq 1 93t9T0 .UTTOM OJOM oo.peue put ..xeqzo t stt uUwP 'tqon Jo diqs-uMo eq. UT udwoo5?utssaoojcT eeJJoo v '(1ItU'•I d0Tfl[ JO S90cO1CTW9 O.XOM 'nJPUc[ JO uoTde0xe Otfl. qq.TM 'weq Jo TTV •9?.Xt ° W 1T1 P8TllPeT eq. PTP Pt' SOWPU -TJ .xteq• A'q weqq. oq. JaJOI hIM i U9W9PflC U I O P 9snoop tllJTJ o TJ J9pJ0 rtq Ut OJOM 2Vet. UO)T[ go q artoo q0T.IST(j 8tT. UT tTI• JTOt.Tq. q.v percPap eq .xeqJteJ9q IITM Sr PUT J PPqS put utur000t OSUJ .UOtpTUJJ JO p9.0tAUO0 IcIStlOtJPA 919t PSSTITj flJpt put tzit' uoq.q2c 'PTW o.opeueq qO1U4 toqo 'PTPWPMP)I UPTWU '9i.t'phIOddt 91M : '1Io!iI)Iv0fl'1 :LLrorrnr 9MP'j eqq. Jo I tA t •dt9 6 epo9 Te uej eq. JO g9 9/9 U11PO :jflo9 ctT epo le"A eq. JO (q) L1 s/o 2 uTq.uro 00 P OPTU; put qU9JtiP.flPJ. : 1 1110 3 LL D)H0 .4 .,,,1,,....'.*, .......1 • ••*••t01• jMq 0I'1tflcJ HLL • • • • • . . • . • • . . . I I I • S S S • • S S S • S • I I S •• • • • I cnit fl!tV 1L NT d"T • • •(91tI qU0ptR0}J 1 'b*1 'eqoutst OJOJOç[ - Pqo)Tn q.t' .9TJSTa tqoti JO .JtO3 •r eq 3° 9L61 3° 999 'okl 89U3 TUUTWTJD TUUT8T.1 0) .XQ - (LL6T/o LL SOj\' stPocIc 'so) LL6I z o 69 'oil rinmt inoo HOIP l0IJOI(TPflf 1rITdCTV VZWW JT VI.PL TO LLPflC'O 0Ifl THLL NI W15, ZVI L/3 —j I - 2 - He arrived at the offices of the Board, in town, on the same day. The arrival of tho coffee at tha offio was acknowledged. on .xh. fltt with the Board's rubber stamp and th signature of a person who did not testify. On the came occasion that same person filled in the baily Coffee Delivaries farm, Exh. "K", showing that rn/v KZG 90 had duly aelivered 120 bags of coffee to the boari. From the board's offices the coffee was supposed to be taken to the factory. The prosecution al1eed that it never was. The a 1 pellants claimed that it was aria was duly received there. There were a number of documents purporting to support the appellants' claim. The factory has two gates. The entry , gate is known as Gate No.2 and the exit as Gate No.1. It is not uiderstooa why this confusing numbering was decided on. Ido not think this was necessary for even from the sketch, xh. "J", it appears that the entry gate first comes into view as one approaches the factory. Probably there is some background to it all. Be that as it may, each gate is man'ed by a keeper or keepers, and each has a register. The igister at Gate No42 1 E]xh. "G", is for incoming vehicles. 1 heir particulars are entered including a description of their load Similarly, the register at Gate Nà.l, Bxh. "F" is for outgoing vehiclese Again, their particulars are entered including a description of their load, if any. Times of entry and exit are also recorded as the case may be. Thus, in this case, it was recorded in Bxh. "G" that on 13/10/76 rn/V IiZG 90 entered tue factory with 120 bags of coffee at 17,20 hrs. It was also recorded in exh. "F" that the same vehicle left the factory empty at 17.50 hrs. The entries in the two reistrs were made by one pe-son. v4e shall come to this later. Once a vehoile is inside the factory there is another process of documentation. In the factory there is a representative of th Board. In this case it was benedicto Reverian (pv,2). I have noted that th arrangement was not clear to the trial magistate who got the impression that Pw.2 was at the Board's offices. The duty of the Board's representative is to formally consign the coffee to the factory ds if he were sitting in the Board's offices. SLnoe he is in the factory premises the consi g ning is theoretical and purely documentar'. It is effected by te issue of a consininent note addressed to the factory. iven more awkward is that the boards' representative acts on inf or-. mation supplied, by the factory employees. He does not personally sea the coffee.. And so it was in this case. On 13/10/76 Benedicto Reverian (Pw.2) reocivea in his office two weight notes, .Exh.. "B" and "iP' from Norbart and henedicto Mujaki respectively, purporting to show that they had weighed coffee brought in by rn/v MZG 90 on that day. The book from which exh.. "B" was written will feature later in the judgemen-t., On the same day, and no doubt on the same occasion., PW.-2 was given the delivery note, exh. "A", brought by Badru from Kabulala. P.2 did not make reference to this in his evidence but there is a signature that purports to be his own on exh. "A". On receipt of these documents he prepered a consignment note No. 26551, exh. "W' by which he consigned the coffee to the factory. There is a signature at the bottom of exh. "D" acknowledging "receipt" of the co- ffee on behalf of the factory. After the consignment, note PW.2 also prepared a Coffee Transp ort Voucher No. 05406, exh. C "", to which he attached a copy of the consignment note and sent the two docu- ments to the board's offices as authority for paying the transporter. Let me put in aain that I found no attraction in this arrangement. It seems that P4.2 is in the factory premises out of convenience. The Board does noth eighing facilities of its own. But this maies his respensibilities more imaginary than real. That aside, when it is remembered that PW.2 was not in the habit of seeing the coffee itself, it is frihtening to imaine how open he was to fraud and deceit.- And that, in fact,- was the thesis of the prosecution. It was contenaeu that the weight notes, exhs. "B" and "B", taken to P.2 were fake. vie have already seen that brighton was a production officer - an assistant proauction officer to be precise. He graded coffee, among otner things. ie ioulu then direct acceptance or rejection of /3 •sutoct st,rq oq uotjeptsuoo aAUP esi2ui Ot!J LII.tJ oq. suoT.esnoo q- peci uIcide et •utpo -JJO Ut O eITt Ip WOqr sj.xnd o piit?O Ueerhxp '• zo qdoej ap toujoe ttxr4 Ut TOiT.TM r40..J -UT 0q TT peuitsuoo pu •txe uojjoo eq jo qdtooj ppeoujo '() U2tJAT O 9 tpUea 'tqU -.sjd speo et -o; eLq. VIiEIfl ° JUT e ouepTAe JqUeWnoop 8 4 T UO A1tAu pet{J .etTJ, .AJOqOJ e q T (4 PeJATT?p SM Eo;;oo aq. peUrteO S pa j4Tnboe OM sAoqtznq. eqT uei' p us 'su. Seou.j&p uj '06 On e as oou p'p G p 6 ijcn 4np Uo SM ou, cUp tXeW eq. uo •eejjoo jo sq aqT jo eouG3 :-z jJ TOTSIftTd si.xnsue IenToe 9TACdflS e} JOq.AJeSUOO eejjoo '() OeU1 tS UtOf OS •t - BJeM OSTE 6M eqj 'US T OU p4 JTq ITOTTly. Lio1 tiznsj, U. SM TT 2utAs — 9 SeSSeu.tM .XC40 )UTqq. I T40 l um I 911 tT'1 qq-T •TTJcTTWJ peWT10 1 pUE II'Md 'OEJ U tOOJ 06 o7i ll API TeTiq 'uoouJeJ q.ot{q. uo STilp UO ajeblWOtjtJ JO TIE 'aod UstT' TefltIW pu 'TT° tTtT.t8M OST '(ti'i) flW)fflWtnrj UOf 'eO UtIdWS '(oii) ntmi UEUOf 'TIeO .UTti '(6d) O)JOO)J UtOf ')jIYfO T?TtTM e '(t.d) wnrj oepti q p c;iqSa. .T '1 8 A •puJeouooXT D'iip OU JT UFJA8 eidoecl eaW TIE Sq U)S titeq J1OLJq.M qdp pue 'pO1-JO JOOJ G qT O1.UT eWOO pITtOO qjolq ~~ A Sue TEUT @Tq T ssodwr sWes -T 9 Ou 9 PTAc GLIT WOJif •SJexod•pu sjeo (uTp.xo) UT{dWS 'S)JeIO 'UU8M Jt.G JAS UJ eJeT J(4OTP9U8E pue qxqxoj Uloj; •pepidod t- sc 'pocx s 'Voqos; et LL Je0çJJO At.rnoes ;eto v'4OE; at. '(9''1.) UZ?WJU!1J STTr (4 snototdsns Jt3 pq.ode iaqj °ousq JTT Ut fl0 qe ozi' Te T oqSSoCtW IUoTstTd uteq sL e joj e j G lqq-j •.iVej etfl. pe 8UOIU UTOf 'U p)jOO SM tJ SO Rti u sdtjq. JOqS iqq. UO UM -X atlT eo;eq 06 OZA Ucas T ou pU 15JUf Pue UtOf 'SJ4SteJ OM. eLTI. Ut setJue aq ?UTJUJ pe14iWp I'°N 1-D TE P1 -T TOT J.eI pUe e 'ON eOtT9A 9t4 TJt T P I req e q j14 eOtICptAe 5 T' c TCWTETO e H OqOiJ F%T4q. (4UI 06 DZI J° cue E4 peMOqS OS Jeq.SteJ UMO SUtW(J •jMC SeOeCT ç9 se IOtt.M 'O UTUUCW ueqq SM OT4tA. S 4 UUTW([ eq OT OUT T TJMPU Z~ Tjelqq. peOe.ep nt octt Tc RJGTOeJ @ql Tiel p 06 D7 X A/w qq. Uteei pE'Je.tIe put; oi petsçu(4se ElJM PIElJCD pUE UTOf T UTU'(IO U() OEl' ElL(. (4 pUJneJ pue TJ pqq- Y,00T UOf qOtqM JL=TJG SpJOM JO eJTZttTOX? tIC SErM ElJCT 'eOu .1VJ81T[ - P pleq OS1 e} JSI?CJ Eqq. Jo uotssossoc Ut wtq puno; or4 UTOf iq peOEl.x. '' a H .UOq14.?TJ xOJ peoo Uetfl. OM. CL 'SJtJJC JO eqes euiES et. pe.xeA3OSTp pUC 310Gq CWOO pt4 PIEJCD JCTT. 8UO IJEtTWTS SOM ieste 9t C4, 6 0jow SCM T.ElqM 'pue EltIO ET u0qT TJq puno; OSC e '06. ozw st T0T1M JO SUOtI 'flG qCiJ. cq 01. 2?UtTCM se'joJeI 014 pUTlOJ Elt U.It1CJ STt? UQ •eC jEl UOTT..I[ 2UtACElI S93j s lu WITM q-TT0q• )t4 (4 tI.UCM PUE OTEP, eq, pe)0O eJOJeJt.fl. OH IT01 QUO. O. UtO OI[ ttUof UESUt t4 TV qJei PIJD •p1odoer1 Otto IUOJJ te eotjjo u .oe - oo pUEl o oq p1exe poJepJO ej-r eq.c C Wetq. o. J.OAO eJJo uciqttit ..w.d ot q.nOO qtT{q. pe;çSe (17id) OSt PT'D Pt (' 1 !) "-t°f C[ 9- 9L/0T/I UO WC1 O PV WOff 4 a 4 G 2 .TXO Cqt '1: •oyj t! p4.J2S stiototdstis OtTj 'p3CCnS OC C. OWCO J8ATICPUOU Vqt pu .ot rJepUoM io; pesnoxe eq pinoo CUO t.41(( POTTdWGO eqeJoqee os seçqtewJo; JT4UCWflOO L- s ,-14T lIE 14Tç4 r°i sTT pue 06 O7J\1 jci 9JIfl0T.JEld euq. p.xooex o q. peq.Jodzt2cT q.JCqJO T.TOtTM Ut 'SJCqSTE?J r•U WCJ, UCJCJTP cjei T ou 'Hi •qxe 'J8StOJ El 1c11eut; St CJCtTJ •CfeTMOU)T sttc?TJE tiOqtM qou •tx JO CStt Eq. CT.4 9T 'OCS iVqJOqS TICLS at 'CJ!iT qoesequt JO St .CTM eSteJ e2 pXCMUT • qxe WOJ; TT q ntitSip oq l q.T pCJEW Os CAEt SC 3j ooq STT4 oq. JCJCJ tTTM I uotsnj:uoo SSO1 JC Lff !Jj 'tXC COti Y.I 2 TCM ett. 9TOJI4 O T OTpouag qotqM 1U0J3 3fooq etfl. s e piTeu- - 7x@ J8LOUC 5(111 jooq Sttj •jooq peqOeCe etq. Ut r'CPJoOCJ SCM seq OT etTq. Jo qeM oq. 'j • qx 120 eou.eoo d ;o uewesJopue 9uoq.tJ ;o eqtS ut rue tse000 stuq. u eej;oo pe3eoJ JOJ pe9fl sc sooq eou Tq T iam 914 r 'o JeT?/eJ pUC socq e.ou TeM epo [OUT Seqj •J[ElSt iJOqOE1J aq epiuc osr u i sjooq TCJCACS ee 9 ,1914 J. 4OW t100110 U(O UCW C I pTes CTY '9SCMJCT.fl.O eo;:.:oo eqq. Jo sieq eq MElS uee ei pet;tSoq TICUOSJCd a H •JOUTW 5T tt( UC41TTJa Oq. qxT )joO. OtM JCEY[O qou cc .t .peu313 pue H 'UCOIO eqSnqo J seq ot odeooi • qx jo oeq CI OJIt RTnp cu 85(10 SEq UT JCATJP otq. A'.q oqou Aeiviep 9t lT jo joeq OUT Ts iuq4JM Ul Stuq. op pifloM 9 H 'TTEflb uo uTpueciep CCJOO et —— I— -4- He neverthelece found as a fact that rn/v hZG 90 never delivercu coffee to the factory on 1/10/7 6 . he therefore pr000eac-u to convict the appeiwants as charged bat curiously acqited tao turnboys. The appeals ao not raise anything new. They roaeat mainly questions of fact, greeter emphasis bein put on the fect that the board paid for the coffee simpiyin receipt thereof); that there was no physical stock taKing at the factory aria that there was (or could be) a auplicate key for Gate No.1. The appclthts aloe onder how on the same eviaence some people era not charg'eu while others were acquitted. It goes with;ut Baying that the questions thr determination were mainly, if not wholly, q uestioilb f fact. They also aoonaed on the credit to cc given to tii WitnsGO. The ceiitral question was whether MZG 90 delivered coffee to the f--c - tt ry on 13/10/76. Tue trial magistrate stated that La believed join iuuungu (.3) and Gerald Mugyabuso (PvJ.4) to be witnesses of truth. He therefore found that the vehicle could not have boenit out ciuring their brief absence. I have no reason to believe otherwise. It was inyressed on this court by Mr. Mwale that the trial court never gave thought 'to the possibility of a duplicate key. I do not think it had to. Darnian, who allgua to have let out the vehicle, id not claim to have used a key. he saici that he found the gate open. But I believe as did 14e trial maistrate that Pi'.3 had left the gate closed. it then, means that j3amian never went to gate No.1. It also means that the register 'was taken to hir1i by Brighton. It is not witilLut sinificance tiaat brighton never made refererce to this episode in his evi.ence. The naarest thing he could say was that his handwritiila was not in tne ro,isters. But that is undorstandeole. he was at ic-act sufficiently intelligent to minimise the chances of his incrimination. In this swila ocnriCction it is equally not insignificant that the coffee was entered in the !rejected" weight note book. idthough the eviuence is silent as to the implica-. tions of this action it was improper eccoruing to Elms Liufung'ameza (PI.6 When this witnese, as security officer, callea an Brighton and demanded ; to inspect his books, Briliton imoecciutely calio for "G2 11 . He was therefoe aware of tj clerical irre g ularities although he had passea the coffee as acce 2 to'ble. Besides, Bri,hton behaved rather strangely. when investiati."ns started on tne following day he pleaded with John Sirneo (p.5) not to report tue rnattr further, saying that he would otherwise be in troole and stating ta't he knew all about MZG 90. Although this cannot be clasifid as an admission of any offence it nevertheless sLo;'s that Brighton was burdened with a guilty conscience. Besides his own assertions, hadru called two porters whom he allegedly hired to off-load the coffee. But these witnesses clearly testified onsomething uifferent. Balthazar John Ngaiza sici that on 13/10/76 he only bought a banana from BacLru. He said the day he was hired to off-load coffee by dru w.s 15/10/76. And it is true that on that day Bad.cu brought coffee to the factory. Vactasto Tizanga, on the other hand, rereubered only lc-ndig money to Baithazur on 13/10/76 to buy the banana. At that moment he was engad on a ccifferent vehicle. It is also eviuent from his answers to the trial court anci the prose- cutor that he may have off-loaded Budru's coffee cnl5/1 0/7 6 . It is only ?aschal Thekiama who alleged seeing MZG 90 on 13/10/76 and helping Badru with an empty ba 5 for a torn one. The trial court, however, hu gOOd reason in rceiving his evia.noe with caution. he hua recently been dismiesee from thL f otory end had iUS own interests to serve in givin?. c-vieance. On the ccntrary, the court further believed as true the evince of th clorks P4.8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 and OVen that of P.5. I can find no grounds to believe otb.er- siwe.- It is unlikely tuat all these witnesses oLla have failed to see the vehicle or that they ganged up to testify falsely against the appellants. And when 50105 of them said they knew the vehicle well they were not en.-a 6 iii6 in ide talk.,,: I 'have noted that between 9/7/76 and 12/10/76 this vehicle visited the factory 49 times. It was indeed a familiar siht. The witnesses could not have mistaken it haci they seen it in fact, .. -j -5 - I am therefore satisfied and similarly find. that MZG 90 never delivered coffee to the factory on 13/10/7 6 . There were other phy- sical impossibilitis pointue to, mainly that no vehicle could overtne another thiii tn factory priaises. The jSat reisters purport to show tn. t ILZG 90 loft earlir th..n the vehicles which arrived before it. I have ueciueu not to place much weight on this impossibility no tha trial Lfl :: never visited the eit to see for himself. but even allowin b :cr the possibility of over- taking, Iv1ZG 90 couli not overfly th cl: ccci gate. Certain other isucs may be dispoasa cf here. It was tstifid by simon Buberwa (P.l) from kabulala tht the coffee was paid for which to him meant that it had. reached. factory. I think he was oonfuseu.. The roper explanation which I accept was that given by Gervas Lekela çw.l3), the )ioard's marKeting manager. He said in effect thot coffee is paid for in advance. The Board gives money to a buying ceubre :n loan with which money the centre buys coffee from farmers. The coffee is therefore paicc for before it is shipped from the centre. There was in the event no sianificance in the fact that this ooearred on this occasion. iihat is proably interesting is tht no stock t:i was curriecL out at the fctory. Ironically, an auuior Filbert Kilimua isha (?;J.14), was sent to kuoulala to ascertain the snipm ' nt but not to the factory to ascrtain the arrival of the coffee. It does not occur •to iflC though, that the opposite would have maue any ciiff'erence. hcoard.ing to lias Piufungameza (P4.6) no check was 1iiae because they wee convinced that no coffee had been ueliverad. and it sounus froi 1ct tnecos of appeal that coffee moves very fast once insiue the fctory and a check woulci have prouuced nothing. I t_iink the exercise was rightly avoiaed even if it would have fuither strengthened the case for the prosecution. Heverting to th, chares, we have s:en tit Damian was alone charged with fraucLulont false accouritin :, in the first count. It reloteu to the entry he maue in the in;: id gate register £xh. "G' 1 , Be purported to s.t,.w that iiZG 90 entereh th factory with 120 bags of coffee. ecti a 317 (b) unuer which the charge was laid makes it an offence for a clerk or servant, with intent to ciefraud, to make or be privy to making any tube encry in any book, aocument or account. I have ff anti with the trial maistrate -th.t 1ZG 90 never entered the factory on 13/10/76. The entry in Exh. 11 Q 11 was therefore false. He also mcd.o it with iiitent to defraud for he did so with full knowleuge of its falsity. As wee the-n properly convicted and I sustain his coilviction. The same is tiuc in count to in respect of Brighton. He mdc an entry in Exh, "A" which was false. In his evidence ho assertaci to have actually seen the bas of coffee, sdying otherwise " a man can cheat me." but ira his riemoranccum of dilP 6 C 1 ground I (c), he turns around and says he only saw coffee on a tray anci that e dici not ul in visuolisiAi., vehicles, he is in other words saying that ne lied. to the trial court. In those circumstances he must have made ch entry with an intent to defraud for he was aware of its falsity. I will likewise uphold his conviction on count two. In the last count I am satisfied uoyo.d rc son le doubt that the coifee never re ce the factory. '.L'n a pall .nts who allege-u seeing it know better whe o it can be found. Thu oniy reasonable inference is that they stole it. I uphold their convictions on that count. The appellants complained about tia exclusion of certain people from thtz charges. I do not know who these people are and they did not name any. Pr.sumably they hea in mina each andeveryone who signeci some aocu;:ont. Be that as it m..;, the complaint is of course academic.... tiven if more people were cn.reec. that would not have excused or reaucaci he appellnts' own criminality. I am satisfied, though, that these other people were misled by tile appellants. They acted blindly. It seems, in fact, -that the appellants were exhilarated by tiie- rampant ne a ligenoc anci took advantage of the situation. -J - p - 6 - However, I ao share the appellants' wonder that the sixth, seventh and eighth accused, the turnboys, were acquitted. It is these who, along with Bedru, conveyed the coffee to an unknown pluce. ThCy were in the event equally guilty of theft. The trial maiutrte stated that he was acçuitting them because he diu not believc, that they shaxed in the loot. That is just strange. For the purp080 of crimisl liability the offener aocs not have to gain from the crime. Other- wise courts would find it noat to imposible to reister any convictions. It is uhfortunate that this court has no power of itown to substitute convictions a b airist these turboys. It is even more unfortun.te that the Republic has net found it fit to appeal aaiist the accuittals, As I have observed on ear1ir occosipns itsecs that the Republic goes for trivial casea only0 io can only hope for the better. To suminarise the foreoiag I have not found any merit in the appeals as re wards convictions0 They are dismiasod on all counts. The sentencing on the third count attracts the interference of this court. It ctoes not appear t1t the lerned re..ident maisrate was mindful of the Minimum bentences Act, 1972e At least he did not say so. The Tananyi1a Coffee Board (now replaced or to be replaced by the Coffee Authority of fanzania) -whose coffee was stoln was aspe- cifieci autaoEty. By reason of item 3 in the First Schedule to the said Act, therefore, this offence was punihaole thereunder. And by reason of Section.5 (d) theroofthe minimum sentence would be five years imprisonment for the value of thu coffee stolen exceededshs. 5 9 000/=. Thus the- sentencin 5 on the third count was illegal.. I am obliged to correct theerror and must observe that were the appellants invited to show cause I would have considered fitti-na sentences aove the minimum. For these reasons I will, as I hereby do, set aside the sentences of three years on thethird count and substitute a 8entenceOf five (5) years' imprisonment on each of the appeiants. This sent nce will run from the date of committal, 12/3/1977,. and concurrently with sentences in counts one and tw. wieie applicable. In the final result the appeals fail in their entirety. They - are so dismissed. The new sentences will beicurtified to the rison autho- :TitieS without delay. - 4 • ' K. S. K. LUGAKThGIRA, J U D GE.. M whZA 3/611977.