19780815 TZHC Dodoma1
I_N THE HIGH COURT OF AT DODOMA f" r~ I ·~T ' .. ,l~.4•J;:r..k-,-~,. /1/c APPE·: ,Li',TE.JURISbICTION HIGH COURT CRII1IN,\L QXPP•:,\L Nao 253 OF 1977 ORIGIN,".L CRIMINAL CASE Noo 8 OF 1977 OF 'I';;'_:: DISTRICT COURT OF SINGIDi\ AT SINGID/\.) BEFORE: L Ho M. MAGES SA == "o o o RESIDEIJ'I' ..--.GIS'IRJ.TE AMIR...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19780815 TZHC Dodoma1
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 1978
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
I_N THE HIGH COURT OF AT DODOMA f" r~ I ·~T ' .. ,l~.4•J;:r..k-,-~,. /1/c APPE·: ,Li',TE.JURISbICTION HIGH COURT CRII1IN,\L QXPP•:,\L Nao 253 OF 1977 ORIGIN,".L CRIMINAL CASE Noo 8 OF 1977 OF 'I';;'_:: DISTRICT COURT OF SINGIDi\ AT SINGID/\.) BEFORE: L Ho M. MAGES SA == "o o o RESIDEIJ'I' ..--.GIS'IRJ.TE AMIR R,\M.·J)H1\NI MK,d'.JDJ\ o o o i,PP;:;LL. .NT THE REPUBLIC o o o o o· o 'o o o o o o RBS~ Oi·-;,.;ENT .£1:hf<GE: St.,aling by 1ublic servant c/ss 265 and 270 of th,, P,.m.:c,J. Cod..J. JUDGMENT .9:9~£E'rA,. JD Th-e ah_:·:; llant 7 Amir Rar:: :tdhani Mk3.ndai was convictC::d o.f t;, . c 'f me~ of steali_ng by ·, uhlic s.:rvant c/ss 2 70 and 265 of· th,~ Pinal Code, and was s.::nt,,,nc-d to three ( 3) Y· •ars irn1,ri~;onment under th2 Mini·mum S .mt1:1nC.:.'S Act, 1972 o H,= now a, l),'. also Th,, ros~:cution adduc,-!d th,: followin<J •~vidt~ncv~: in March, -1976, ··ch:., o.: •~ .....:llant was a Su1:-Jerinb:ndent of ·Police a,:cl ·.Jas sL1tiun ·d .at Ki,:,ITLboi as O::.':ficer Cornman ling District (O.Co De).; In such ca.;,ar.i:ity th"~ a •;,~lli.mt 1-i.:1's resr.onsibl~ for k-:>c1,inq' .,~xhibits monies in th· safci, 1.ayincj ,)ut- sc1lari~s and allowanc,:s to 1,olic•: ·of::"ic,;~rs und<~r his charge an.I- colL,cting r .:v,mu,= ..from sal'2 of fir'--' arms lie, ·nces and µermi t-s for sal,~ ':;.. t~ansf.~r 9£ fire arms o As rE~g a.i;:-ds th! "'xl{i.bi t money, th(:= procedure was th0t th(·; a.:~: :,llant, QS OoCoD ... would r<.:!C ,ivc th-· f!Xhibit mon,~y ,-::itk-,r from t;-~,, charg•2 room o:::.:C::~ic~ or the criminal invc,sttigations dtUH.rtm,c.nto On n~.:::,:2i,.t q': this mon;.;y, thF~ .:i, ~:-2llant .would enter th~ mon :y ·•in 3. regi::;·,:er ket,t for {h;:2 1,,ur 1.,ose, si<Jn th .c:in for·•r '.C·,ii..t of'' th ➔ moh,2y 7 ent,:r it in a safe~ r'-'rJist,:~r and -c:h:,n k,'-:~::; i t in th," safeo · Each timi~ an o fio~r requirc!d a , articular mon,.;y ,:xhibit h..c wc.1u1,·, go to th,, a., ell ant who v,Jduld give him th•: mc•:1.ey in questiono Th8 app,.llant would th··n obtain th, signature of th: offic-•r in th,: ,~xhil:ii t rs2~;i:;ter, ,.J.'1~: an· a;;i.ro 1Jria_te ent.i:-y m;ci.de in th~, safe .~dJistero On 10/3/76·, the Rvgional polio'. Comm0.'1der, · SinqiJa R..~gion (Pi·,.13) rcc,.::i ved an ordt2r from th-, Insi,·,ctor-Gent:iral of Polio-) that th" a ,.•.:llant should :v,roc,""'"d on transfer to T2t1t)ao On 15/3/76 1 Pwo 13 dis1-atch•id Ont, Gaspar, unoth-~r [JOliCt: o_;'ficer, to go 2md ta. 1<:c: ov,,r from th, a 1 ellant at Kiomboio For som~ unknown reasons: th•2 a.::, ~11.J.rit c,id not hanci over to th,i said Gasµaro So on f8/3/76, Pwo13 sent his R,;;si<.,nal C.rime Offic.·ir (Pw. 9) to Kiomboi to go and supervise ti-i,,• handin~r ov:.T b ,CWE·:,:n th,: a;_,;... ,~11ant: and .th•· said Gasparo· That •;V•..:nin<J· P\vo9 t-roc .'.;cl<.:d to Kiomboi, and on 19/3/76, he instructed_ .':he. appellant to 1,r,-1;_ ~1rc, ;:L ;,:1ndin 1J over c-:,;rtificate so as to ha.ncl over: to Gasparo Howev,~r, b·.sfore hc.1n Jing ov,-)r to Gas1.,ar,. tht~ a; j.Je·'_l.3.nt ciisa 1-).-'l~o.r,~,d from Kiomboi on 20/3/76 ,. and so Pw a 9 ha_d to r,.c turn to Sin .,ida without ,:iff;!cting the~ hin,l'ing_ OVP.ro A dcisertr,~r fL'....:; was th•:n oµe·n,,~d in r ;S~ ct o:;:=· th>cc a ;ellan'.t; and all polio.: sta.tioris in, TaUZd11id w,':!re notL:i x1 of· ch: disapi-,~aranc ~- of the au>e_l1ant frorr. Kiomboi: · On 24/3/76, "the R,!gional Poli.:: .., Comm,1.nder (-Pw.·13) went to Kior,iboi on an insp•"ction tour o On checkinr; th,, accounts of l{iomboi Polic::i station, Pwo13 discoven~d thut ,,xh:bit mon,~y to~ 1llinrJ shs. 1, 755/90 for r.:.,cui 1. t of which th,, a,, 1;,,llant had sicin,,d :i..n tr,:! c..:Xhibi t n,gist:-1rs, h,,_,l not b~en enter:d int~ safe regist2ro 0000002 2 Th2.t made Pw o 13 SUSj,.:ct that th,) money ha.ct b -~n stoleno AS the ilj;.ip:.;ll ant h::tn by th""n absconded, Pwo13 St~al.'~d off th:~ dPPellant's offic.~ :1n<l 01:·ch:,red th,1t it renw.in under constant guard until th,~ a · ellant cam::,. Later a m,2ss JJ,.:: was rec(~ived from Taneja 'that: th,, a. 1 ,e.·,.1ant was at Tang a polic,, stationo Pw. 13 ·then ordered that th,~ a,, ,,llant should proc,~.,d to Kiomboi ..md .h1:md over th' st~tion to th~~· in-com.:. .1q o. c. D one: '.furnbn 0 , (P\vo11)o # Th-.: a1;1.,~lL:mt Wt:nt to Kiumboi and on 10/4/76, he han::'.ed ov2r U1.: sto.tion to Pw.1io Present at that handing uvi:;r w-~re Pw.9, ,a s-curity offict:r (Pw.10), Pwo11, Pw.13, and one Al:.=ck Noah M\~ak:'atundu (Pw.12) who Wi.1S th.:, uffic-~r in-charge of Kic,mboi .1,iolic,~ s_tation at th"· .m,~t~riul timeo Since th· rlocum.:nts and moni0.s kq,t by. the a. pc:llant w~r--: in th. sc.fe, . the a;,1.Je lant had to open th•: saf2 o When :isk•:d to do; t:.h · i\_,~,,.:,lL.J.nt said that h:.~ did not hilVE:.thc~ k,~y to.th,i safea AskJd wh r,~ it wo.s, h,:; said that it was ,,i th his wife who was at Bukoba. Pw. 13 th~n tolJ him--.. · thc1.t in that case: the a 1,j,ellant woulcl ....b.t~--e..s:cort~~d to Bukoba to brinu th,~ s,3.id key. Th,-,r.~uron, th,-, a, -E!ll ant 1iroduced the k'=Y from hi:; p,.:rs<::>n and 0i'):c::ned thc! saf,~ O • ··---•· .. • ·:T on. chPckin<J th-,:- contents ·of '.:h,: safe, slis.· 7,967/20 wa.s found missing, but for the purpos-:; of thi"s a1j·p,~a'_, w~ ·shall conc'-'!rn ours:,,il:vc::s v,ith shso 1, 755/90 out of that mor.ey which \Jas ,~xhibit moni,::s and which is the amount . . on which -::h \ . . ! convic-:ion was founded. When .:1sk ~d to c1cc.e:~nt for this short_a<J=,~, :'th.: .;a,·.•.·;_,.'llant m.~r..,ly said that he should be given ·l:im~· to r, fund thi·:,·monc-,iy•and r,,qu:Jsb-:::1 P;·J.13 to give him permiss.i.on to go to D'Sal:iam to :s:;,,,i th,; Insp.-,,ctor-G-m.::rnl of folice in order to. discusss wi t-1, him how. to refund th,.: mon,-,'!y. In his defonce, the a: 1 .ellant said th.:i.t during the m ,terio.l p.±riod he was very ·busy with "Operat,i,on Barabaig1t: and so h:: handed ov.=~r th,:: •.!xhibit monies t.? som,~ , ·erson·· wh·o was t:akin<y char~~· of th,: station. in J::.110 absence uf th~" .a:-i,;e lL.mt. In a carefully n:asoned judgm_e:1t, the 1,~arn,~d tri.,l r~,si,ient .;. ma<Jistrate reject8d tht:1 appellant's story :1s a 11 bi<J lie" ahd :.1cc:·:pb:d· th.: 1,ros ·cution I s evidence from which he inferred thut th,~ u~,i..klLmt ho.d converted th,~ money to his own use . :;nd so convicted him ns chareJed. , Mro Mb~~zi, l,~urn-:d,·co.i'.msel for th,-.! _a,,:jellant:, argusd th--?. an),;cll on two grounds, namely:-, 1. That the l.~arn,•d tria:. r~agi~--::rate erred in not b;:~ lieving. that a~n-,llani.' :1ad h,mded ov,:ir th: exhibit monuy to :.n.oth~r :)Olice off.i.c<Jro ~ 2 0 Th:: l,2,3.rn•~d tri.11 mng:.stri3.te erred in hol::ing th,,t th.: clJ•Pt=ll ~nt h~c:- stol':-!n the exhibit moneyo on my own vL~w of th;:' evidenc~, I am ··=ar ·:rrom persu·adcid thc1t th," a.i,:- 1,0llunt' s st,..)ry could r Jason ably :.ie true fun the circumstilllc:?s of this co.sea Th'~ a.;1:,~llo.nt was a senior polic~ :Q::ficc~r. Although he S:11t,..:r~;d thr..: exhibit moni,,s in thv, exhibit nqister and sirJn•_sd fur receipt of thctt money h_e did not enter the monies in thP. safe register. 13esid~s, nowh_•r;_! is it shown that he h,:mdP.d O"•~r th i mon,-:y to arr.~, p,-:rson. Then th~r•.~ · is his conduct before~, durinq ..:nd · after the han<.~ing 0V-..!ro Why did he hr1ve to li•! that h-i. did not Lav,?, the key' to th_, saf~i'? Why did he not thc'r,~ and then say to whom h h;id handed over the 0 ., money and in what manner? Why was ht:! so reluc-:ant to h m:l ov'-C!r the station wh~n told to do so? / 3 ,::.i- In all tht:! ci:cums::anc,~s, th.~refore, I am n~spectfully 2.t one with th: L,~rned ma']istrate that th-, inference th-.it the a~-i•ellant n.,,ver ga,·e that money to any ,)th-:~r officer ,.md that he converted it to his own use wus inescapable. For th forego:.nrJ r;:,asons, I 0, SP.e no reason to justify ,m interference with th':! conviction. As to th~ senter:c(~, it was the minimum prescribed by st.,tute. It is, th1.~r--!fore, to stand. In fine, this aJnc,3.l is dismi•;st'!d in its entirety. Deliven-:!d in opm court at Dodoma this 15th day of August, 1978.