19780802 TZHC Mwanza
DUO suot unszd 7 ons xno oqeoiot °iO'tt ut.ioDda .flOtT.tM otduznsxd Te2qT P uo .91-ax oq. sçu 'çiq. D144. x03 9n0rttqu tTX sem t 'toDd x.tjtr '' uotutxt. uouuoo e (ots) .psMotls a t,e iq. oq. p&UflSDd TTDT ci TTT,3 U80 D7q "' J3 p9UtD3UOO DtPtW u.rtf pDSnOOD pu Dt4 jT uD:..D 1 'utAs s.qnop ItU.t9 PDUT2.XD.U.D 3STU...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19780802 TZHC Mwanza
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 1978
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
DUO suot unszd 7 ons xno oqeoiot °iO'tt ut.ioDda .flOtT.tM otduznsxd Te2qT P uo .91-ax oq. sçu 'çiq. D144. x03 9n0rttqu tTX sem t 'toDd x.tjtr '' uotutxt. uouuoo e (ots) .psMotls a t,e iq. oq. p&UflSDd TTDT ci TTT,3 U80 D7q "' J3 p9UtD3UOO DtPtW u.rtf pDSnOOD pu Dt4 jT uD:..D 1 'utAs s.qnop ItU.t9 PDUT2.XD.U.D 3STU TDcIX.D lq ~ u't. aqtou 0. ot. aDATIlip o. txItDdd sirt3 pDtucdu.oOO.t XT.u a oOUUT pt Dtj I.L-111. V,tttm .ou si j. I e l eD dde Jo uxtpuiowou. sit. u a Aa pu DouD;p stt. jo UtpU IM.OU sT 9TTq LL e m e T Ut ptmOS ;ou SM T1D.IIDdcI pUOOS DT. JO tZOt.OttLttOO zt. ! ~eq~ 4 XD A;MOq 4 DW O. 9u I Utfl .PU t1O ?!U UDD pr;iq iso e ' o;I&tTn 'tO; G411p SM Jt S9 UOtOXXDUt pU '9BIX? XtDt.. jo S39OOId Dt XflOO Dtfl. flO £TD1U • 'oxt. u.tTO PTT 8ttL 'D.fldStP Ut sz.t t3fl4O ?tfl. JO dttTSIitXMO tfl. '4TttU.TS UDT. Dquo 4 2u Gk osnoq asoqm u (17Md) ; PUT'qSek, TXneT499h30 D3tIDcI DtTj. tfl 9 U0P Et •quou O. 9fl4O Dt. UtTTDddD Dt2, ptxTj tDJ 9 PI°° Dt. qottpt UOthl DOUDPTA.D pDTOdd .9ctll °tpo uostzthzt SXDa 9A.tJ 01. pDOUD.UD9 PUE Jo poO -ttLUOo .&fluDnbsqns7 J8M £et •suITedd et. Jo UO -ESU G Iq9aLde 814. pU et JO tDtOO9tp O p01 UTTUU.00 G DU. t11 '9UOtO8t2t. D91T. 0 plom .02 .titXtIctU00 /oii zo; Dqo 1 U 0 TPT° (t ii '&ST). DT? O3 SM LL61 4 Lno 17 U0 9qwo3u U.03 PPmOxxOq pt SZt T.OTtM - 1OOU os iTS Jo Iqap p JO .0 JDfl4D9 Ut SM MOO DtTJ '(Md) TUD Dquo 4 UF? 0. STVWTUe 0M B1j. PTTD? 9(.rnTI3ddD puoos) XUJ ewnf pu2 ( f.uTT9dcI SIT3) opu0Uit 9DT3 'DTmf fl U0 • TTn • IT•s U ptt:.'oo — JO OM r OT (TJ4) CSSfl VWTlf .UtUtId(LOO uql. tL16c 'DTR1f 9 30 .T.2tU Dxq u 2 T1IO[I)flTDIY1 O.flOSO tUTTX0) . . . . . .;1NaN0dSa • . spsnoj tutxd) . • . . • • . .. . • . . • • . 0JMI0DN SWIHO . ( - . •, •• . . • S • T.T J13I!MI(t D?I 90 fl00 • oiiicr 9 91 tao LL61 d o 6 ON 370 nIIIIP13 P1IIDII0 . .. (00 •,. .•. S. LL61 j o 'oi . LLCt o Lc 'Q ddT flJQ J a03. HDIH Z'WM T . .. . •• . • 11T() T.IflTU - •, I I '1 a of which arisa of cicuastantial evidence. 1t seams to that he might have had thisn nind. ,Hcwever in order to convict thereon, such evidcncmut irrcsistibly point to the guilt. cf the accu'sGd and be incapable of any ôthr r sona•bl explanation. In this case the only evidence against the .scbnd ppel1nt was that he ac,ompanied the first:: 3 ppe1lnt., Did -Lht irresistibly point to his guilt? I do not think so. Inth'a absence of any evidence that he had any interest in the cattle thms2lves t was unsac tc hold otharwise. He should have been aoquitted- ..• On the oth.r hand I cannot fault the oonvictin of the first appi1ant. It is.h :rho borrowed money from ang'ombe on 4 Febunry. It i hewhb r-tuned to Jang'ombe in'y and pro!ised to pay with a cow on 11 June4, Indced .on. ii June he did pay with a cow and ven-.sold a..bull to. lr, angonb. On those facts and the fact that the latter transabtion took place three days after the thaft I am satisfied that he was tne thief-. In the result, 1 allow the appal of Juma ndrea; I quash the conviction and aGt nside ih3 sentence imposed on'him. He should be set free unless further lwfully held. I dièmiss in its entirety the appeal of Chrles Manglomdo. : -K' ( cc WiNZ/ . K.S.K. tUG.AKIUdR4 2/8 /78 - JUDGE • ,1-° '- - ';-