19801203 TZHC Mbeya

1trcxq pezto1 OT4 OYMI 00 OT2ulsqlls qnot.ç uoTotJfluepT qSttt JO tItOTA etfl. SM 1Tfl. UOtOI9SS s4uTIecId1 eu O .T BuT Sk r,edd eq. 'T4flIq et tzpecIs St1M qut'uv3cThoo eqq 4 ,et4 itoqs o. pepu. tnniedd et paq.saaav oqbt eoisnC Jo punoq etq. jo 3OtIpTAo eLua. 11Ebt fl- naml Ot '1'W tXO iccj peiirçjtxoo SI3M -RUOMTqsal S1UUTTdUOo Dql q s,9uTTTTT4s , &qaOJ ']etuU • 'peuqo O. I3p.IO LIT OOUeOiA S pen icTcft at snq t' poq o .noqc'. sv DJ1ttrçvIuoo uett pvoq trç eotd 3l000, ieqqo1 auZ 'eaz9t i .qnop equxosaex -c ptxoAeq peqsqse st qçn52 sxIedth eq. papiqns uqrT.oa '0TTqndaH e xoj TILCIdV 'WatItlOSTtcTuT 4te ueos jo u.xe. V o. peoue.ues si& ptrc' 6 apoo Ivuacl et. jo gge s oq. Ra-exjuoo 'teqqo.i JO pe.opwoo sim qmjjaddc et. qexeq& ozsçp e1tmj Jo rnoo ;oTzcSp aqq. JO UOiSToep T UO.XJ IedCft u st stuj - 'f 'rjijjjg ......... orianaa aHIL snsa. VfNrIVXJ'W TI1WVS avsimi I DIULSICE "sa vaionirnr Sv &X aoaa ronLLsIcr IJkM111i do JEflOD JDIThLSIa aH1L do oL61 d o frL 'on HSVD mmimm 'rNInIo) oL6i io L9i 'OM nivrav nImIIwIuo OIL3IffSIU11C LVTI[cMV VAff1I LLV VI1TZNVL O JIflOO HIH IIiL II • 0, OOU9PTAO .10t?.1VtI0 pq eq. 30 Uossuip1 eq. eq oq. qopt uocln uot;tpunoj ou o xaTovauqo poo? v pq pOSrLOOV 0t4 TUT4T esto TUOSOZd et. uç uaç ueeq ptiq eouepAe oj £I ' 1-ztno 0 n. q pa pxz, mu eq oq eoueques eq tIT0JjE? Jo osodincT aqT xoj 'irra .iepun eso eq. Ui u0i0tAtX00 'trc&elax set:ooeq eouejjo ui ioj UOTpiAU00 Sfl0tAtd 1- ;qq. pepp.o.I tiioTex seuooeq TT OSt?0 qoçqi. UT '.1eq0tVq0 POOD V SU q atf T UtIT UOAT txeeq st'q eouepAe sseun 'u1AeTetrc sç aaTouxuaqo pq ti St?Lt UO.1OCI pasnoou eqq. 02J etrq s2utpeeoO.id ItUIT.I0 UI s spet uooes—qns eq L96I 'ov eouep.& et. jo (I)9c's Jo SUOTSTAOJCI 9fl SUTZOIC peuUs peq.onb OADq i eouepçAe eqq ;o uoTsrupi uonrçTo eq. jo oAsoep t'It i 'esr.0 IvTaT POUeT eqq. oT !loedse.I s9pe.x2 qçj puuqs snq puv o.IT?n1s pts 9tfl UT 0.13 PUV O. ItIt3fltflt UV seT.1eqqo.1 UO UTSTXO ST Ot[tk Uos.1ecl sseqoç -0 sç penao eq !pqq. peu2 .103 pj jo eouepiAe et. ep i :p -rs e.1j.s132ur TvTaT peuitei Otfl. 'COU9PTAE3 JO sioercI @SOLIT Oq. 9UJ.1OJC seup. TUaGAOS UOST.Ict UT uoeq 9ADtI flOA noA noqu M0U S.1efleItp tIbt0r ITU Puv TvuT17Jc.10 Tt4q 2T4 eq. ev pesnoot eq. e•i7 no 9 SUOT ~ aOSSV eetq. IflTIk uottxttrXe—sso.10 UT eoUOpTAo stq pepnouoo SGUTI-t Ot[J 11 ?UUt0U .?Uiop 80tfl(I Tmjaurl puu ptres snq oqq. UTLfl.TM qnoq Sttfl0.1 insn eq put Uo.1ecI sseqoç c S OqM U0s.1OcI pasnove 91fl. MOtDT I is bprs 'M SID eouepte eA? OT4M A.1UeH AU0r!4se. gTt j0 2 U TUUVeq C14 Tjr t?1 30 .u1oct 9110 110 oti .10 PaOm 3 Z 0. 9.ITSOp I 9SO 914 14'L I O.10JO 'T 0. TqPTam 011 qo3 pIflOi%t I - -3- s. 56(1) of the Evidence Act, 1967, reproduces the common law rule on the point. In his boolç, H V I B H N C H CASES and MATERIALS (1975)9 Professor Heydon gives the rationale of the common law rule. He writes, at p.. 2 59: 11 The law is wary of admitting similar fact evidence for the following reasons. First, the effect of this evidence may be unduly prejudicial even on a trained tribunal •.. Secondly, similar fact evidence raises many collateral issues which it may be too distracting, expensive and time consuming to investigate in the light of the main issues of the case. Thirdly, it may take the person against whom it is tendered by surprise unless he is prepared to defend himself with respect to all the bad acts of his life. Fourth1y,ifsimi1ar fact evidence is too freely admissible it may encourage the police not to search for the real criminal but instead to discover someone with a possible opportunity and a record. In the sane way rtty be possible for the criminal to cover his tracks by coniniting the -. rime in ciicumstancë ,the±ë ânothèr maA with a record may be suspected.0 , When trying a case a magistrate should not wait for objection C. . . to be taken to the admissibility of bad character evidence. It is his duty—particularly in an undefended case - to stop any question which is likely to elicit inadriassible evidence. Did the errdr coimit±ed in the iréent case J . occasion any micarriage of 1xstice? I thinknot. In my view the rest of the ev1dence stblisheci-the appellant's ilt beyond a se doubt. The error is thereforo, a currable . I now tum to the appeal against sentence. I can s e e no sufficiefit gioimd to warrantue s;ying that the learned trial maistrite should hare brought the merciful provisions • . 0 p.-.. - 4.- of s. 6(1) of the Miiuur.i Sentences Act, 1 972 , into play. The appellant had to be made to reap the fruits of his anti—social conducte The learned trial naistrate riht1y held that S. 5(b) of the Act I have mentioned was applicable to this case. The appeal stands dismissed in its entirety. - B • A. SAMXTA JUDGE. Delivered this 3rd day of December., 1980 in the presence of Mx Teemba, counsel for the Republic, B A. SI'II4ATA JUDGE.