19801104 TZHC Musoma1
I put tTUIt; UT Jotox StM o.xe eodctn Xt;Jt ut t St Ot.X op.xq JO xtptrn;o pu 2utATe6&x 'quit eix •eot.icl ept.xq JO pun;a.x 0t SIUOAO C rJ ppntott-t - ouuto q. op7etrq. et. ti utstxe sq eq .o7 nur £o.rrs tnx stqq •estzes poo Soui u xo oe.xt oS iodo.zd 5ctt XCAO SC. eqs jç sqep sptxtqsnq ptep xoq .xo; eqçsuode.x s...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19801104 TZHC Musoma1
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 1980
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
I put tTUIt; UT Jotox StM o.xe eodctn Xt;Jt ut t St Ot.X op.xq JO xtptrn;o pu 2utATe6&x 'quit eix •eot.icl ept.xq JO pun;a.x 0t SIUOAO C rJ ppntott-t - ouuto q. op7etrq. et. ti utstxe sq eq .o7 nur £o.rrs tnx stqq •estzes poo Soui u xo oe.xt oS iodo.zd 5ctt XCAO SC. eqs jç sqep sptxtqsnq ptep xoq .xo; eqçsuode.x s -c Mopp tMtI . tuzosno tç.in.xopun iOJ ooTxd ep-çiq Jo u.xne.x oqq, io; pens snM ueddt oq ossesst ettf. jo aoxApn eq. pedeoot moo 3°'3'a etfl St TTOM St SxemT Ta atu ICJC c3tiT 0M. Jo C;TM TOXO ,XOt u-c gq.TTTqaT - r suTteddt aq. ;o uoiqsenb oqq s7i quTod .ioduç qsour eq 4 noo oq. pepoddt .xeqIn; -utrroddl3 eq. suosoep oseq. trp ei,to o spteq OF, o. ftroj 9,01aquTcr ot iq poonpox SSM sçt trçeo -p:d opçaq eqq pun;ax oq. .xe po.xop.xo put mvT zepun putqsnq al.!eT ICtt JO oatTd trg DTqvTT aall pttnO; flOQ etj pu tno, rttrçi toa t uttprs xeq .10; e0t.1dep-çIq JO quatuird oqq rtotrc uo sutJ.. eq. nOqt momy ue4e4ott seop ots SUTSns MvTO P°T-'P uoTieddt eujj' • •.iedoxd s 1 putqsnq aq - t peçerç ptq eqs esntoeq sqq. rçop SM eq tx-cettt utecIt qq. eyçrn sçq pens eq 'ptep' sw eoçid ep'ç.xq eq paxcGOOa oq t u,.zeqo.xq -çq 13=0-TOIA eotrçs qvq4. put v 2uvqmv Skj .iO; pçtd ptq eq awcad :ap.1q oq. JO pUflJ9X Ot .1O s.trtpeeoo.id eseq. pet!; wpuo!set Ct. 'OtTJ.ItUZSTtI JO UO 1osspaq.peutqo DUTALIH t LL/LG .:°i'I uc° trc pCAtOSSTp 4! P thi aoq I9.tTt at-ç.1.xtm 3 14tO 30 SptOq 9 .o trpunoint aoTxd epJq aT4 PCAT900J eq put CATIt TTTI- StIA tUtC.IC 'pUtqUIti pus tepuodsex eq. ueeMeq o2nTaanm eq JO eta. Oqq y p85t908p MOtt Ounir tmQ.1ej putqsnq 59UtTTOctctt eq JO .xesTs e7 - 9tM S 2u'0TltMlA •GTXIl 'OUn.tj7 tutqtrIt potitu t—tt-.ioss TTCctc eq. eq . (GtGt .10) 996t UT eUrçGUrOS q.tq. q.rno - t-t.x. eq. • Ct'tO JO spteq 9ç 0 9uTqunome o-rid ap -c.zq eq 'tzepuodse.x o. oo-cd optiq JO Ut .1OJ .InOQ A.XttIit.I& tn2t!t ut pens StM utTToddt aRa eçwstp StM 1noo at.zqst eq o. s.rr; oq. Ttedclr puoaos t St stq w a o c ne OQoo. ;:, • ; :,:' :: T LnIrIav : • , • t ;r.. t 4 FA r • TL.&) -TiO .0 OI esto ITATO tno utI Cl ttut .OptJt etqs -r .xotue '•bsa 'tcIti'aw 'rr ;r- LfET o ccrir c1 tT'ATp u eti1tttt t otSt tT] 96D OLIVTa efl. J UoStop ot - r T - 6At II4p P5 4 - ..-'.. f - . YI1 iZflVL O L?!flOD Ji-DI aH1 II ii she was to get married, wou:th-e. nily allow the appellant to collect the bride price sir she took Vloretja's properties at hi death? Or would oolp like her brother—in—law (D1.2) Werena's elder brother claim the booty? gin the family allowing her to collect te bride priOThr any of the daughters. If she has no rigt to- receive i1'e bride pioo for the daughters, why snould she ive the duty to refund the bide pree 0fhe divorced daughter 9 'Thosi &ho wold recivo tio bride p.ice ir 7eroma's place, should b tl .peop1êto 1iav the duty to 'efund eride price in Verena's place. This p&r w1Ldv eho'ild not be ead1od. dlth afient of family L debts. ii p'.t1ice reasons I do not agree that the appellant is liable to fund the bride pr pc.id for her sister—in—law merely because wife she took the properties of )Ter iUb 'who 1ad received on : -'thu :Q31h amh1 1' bride priee ocorairt. iy I allow appeal and set asidO hc 3udg?int on orders of both the below. The apel1an will also have t1- à -costa of this appeal.