19800300 TZHC Mwanza

I OUOt )TtsflN SM PUPSTtT .X9T. 9UGUOO C)tT 9U0 upuods.x cq2 &q petw tie uçt petuep 1'M st pet.xn'w eieu uepuodsa.x eti. 'wttT oq ?txTpx000y •rLIrn1tII • -:TPU 92Tq P9TJUJ ptt 1961 Ut je 9t WOUM 1JTO11 tIOSgT o. peiisw • 'Z961 ut petp xett; sttl UCtM 'tq. ppp .04TUOP'Tx v 3f 'sTtN O. pTiXW P'T - I9TS stt 'c6i JetTi;e St tX pe.jtsOq. • . . quPTTeddu etTL -9hoqv et. puto srozas eoujop et • • /OOi7'8t tO pue s !~ ,e O2 eC.x1. '8O JO SP I39 U ZIS petrnJ8.x st • o2uoç iw 'paox SIVXiBOqS. tueu 1-I TMW o/p ThZZiT1M £xJiu O. urtt 72 noaq q. X971.J s , quvjj9ddv et.. oq. pttcT e.xeM S TP 02 9AJ JO Spt?T U8!3T MO puie 'SUOt.UUt S.UepUOdSeJ eta. qroq v -- -: tSt1N USTT J9tT UIOJJ W'TI9dd Ctfl. p9WXOJUt 8t MOt ptI 'OUOflI • swcTiedd etq. paop.ue Aeu. 'Moti o. sp, pOtjtqSe os 'zqt • 998UIM s.ueptodse.x etp •o3uo) v3frsnW - putqstu sitj elql Sq p-çd.ueeq 'eotxd eptq et upurLJe.x UT Pav e131° Jo 9peU XTS tOTtW JO xd 'eo -txd epçq et ppoe - • •. QtM 8t.J S1.UT9dd M t 6 3T. tJt9O U0d59.I etfl TeM • ept.xq jo pum;x S JOJ VOT Z Oe st. pe't; et .xet TwJod 0q eT1.X qu8dcI ot4 s pus 4 peei5 ts urtt o. RuTpj000V •oq ouioo o xaq 2nos et • • 'wu O. .x000i ue 'zL61 ut irq .zet m v s .xeeu eq puv R v mv UI 8tS - izotqtoo S.X29ic JE4JI? 'JCAOMOt P9U?1.UTtW 9- 1UOW '.XOtX 4 ,1 1e 99 • Ot AI OU pTp ju9puods9jet. 'Liowew JO )O[ JO 'UTSBP Aq eJtT pU . eTo JO Bpet ueeie PuTd ie; 'IeMW .xe.sts e 1 u1ecId eU. 8LLXU1 uepuodsei eu. 'eouepLedepuT e.xojeq peITo -- I' •4uepuodsaI 9T '8? U Ut '?t. 9M 'SJTtOO J8MOI OM1 efl 4.'q peiPex • £qpo SM OM 'uepuodse e q'peop s 'eoupe et • 1Deu .ti.xeue St t41GM ep-cq xoJ wwto e.xojeq qS.XIJ .t2tios eq nisi eootp lssm etetj. et jt (e piie 'pe.xq awt sum uoto eu esro Aiv u (P) pus eqAetGQuT SM sseu.tt4 sitT pu uepuodse.x ou. jo 8oUepTAe (o) 'ietjj s èu o ptd s •eot eptq ou • •• - .XBA9U SM (q) 'uedth etq. puv ! .uepuod p aj at ueeMeq etj:w' • exet. uteq se SpUtQT57 utW 914. peoiqxe e AUtj I toTttM UJO.xJ () 'redd jo umpurOwe.w toç a.tnb peueseJd uttedd eq •ow sçt g aq. o. xno3 sttq. o, ps.dth3 st • •e 1 sseoonsur si to ot stret. o. eodc • etj, • ppepuooesq iests s u811edd 9t{ S 'UflJJ v qons oq. • que •SM • • .uepuodse.i at. 'qq pu pied ,siem eo xd eptxq pros tq 'sM otpJ94 • • •. snOTuuu et . i9 -19 dde etq. pu urtt ueaM.eq • • • ;n etjjgw JO uotJeptuáo ut 'j • s uedd e o 'pd • • r O pewtwjo et 4 sq.SO2 e8.it pus lqj !~ qxo JO SP2Ott U9A918 JO PUTJJ •upuruiep uTeJet u8TTedd et. 'Cqwe2 seui jsuTPRP, uoTqov uv a tTJ ire.ie • .uopuOdse et. io 3f T pussj WeJTMe .JflO3 9,r e wTa aTU8tSfl e4i • or 'IJLL •at.xd epti - . .:wrro - igakocim '. oYIcr&vI fltffI)flTh1 • • • • ,•• '•• • INV S . . . '. ' . . . ' ' . . . S 77, 'DISgilifir . • •• (çJ •jo ç ON IeddV !T'.TO UT .reuo.xes 2 teue.xe JO JTtO3 etq JO UOtSt0 otJ19t(r eT. woi) cLti 6z O OM iira qiAlo (od) • • • •;•• • • • • •.. VZN1W V . • (iete ot.xstc e. ui) VflfZi'tYL J O JTflOO HOIH 'TrT1 MI from whom she was enticed b Manteni Shabara, so that she could stay at his home, •which she did 9 but later left.be9ause of his cruelty, and got married by Masonyi Buchafu. She howevr concedes.that Musika Xigóno was refunded his dowry of five heads o.oattle, he.3OO/= and three. goats,. by Manteni Shabara and not six heads as Wakireri - Isandikb aM Manterti. Shabaa say. This ia confirmed .by. Mttsika Kigongo hims-elf* 1.arid his esco't Mankumbati Mtamwana. It iseasily observed that the appellant'sand the reondet's are diametrically opposed. All the same the obviosis, that Nanteni Shabara 'suceessfiilly enticed. Wankuru Samwel.. from her huband Musi.ka Ki,ongo. according to her, he so did, so tht she stayed with nim, s he was her rdutive. This is supported by Musika .1ongo, wrto would have necessirily known, if indeed the responcLnt married ankuru Samwel Manteni Shab.ra reiica1eç1t4at the respondent was f1'a4 to disclose the enticin, designs tdtheàppellant's father. This means that if Wakireri Isandiko was behind the appellant's father, was not put into the picture. What-furthr vindicates this argument, are tastimonies of Musika jigongo, :a-ndMakumbati s/o Mt a mwana whotestified that, a refund of bride price to JYlusika Kigbngo, was done .by Manteni Shabara. By this time, the appellant's fathr was still alive, and it defea$&xp1ana-ti.on, as to why the appellc.nts fatner was notnvolve it Ice was aJare of What wa goingon. It should mean therefore ~ &tj if the respondent paid any heds of battle atall, he so did to Iv1aneni Shabara. For if the appeilts father had receiied the same I do not see how, even on refunding Nusika Kigongo's bride price, .Manteni Shabara should come in, and why-ere the heads Of oatt1 not taken, •from the appellant's father's place? Ii conclusion, and with due respect to the -lower Corti, fQr the above xeasona, I am of the satisfied vicw, that the appellant's father never reoeived such bride price,. and as. Wankuru Somwel said, she nevcrLmarried by the respondent-s for if she e.5ily confesses having been married qonseou . tiyely by-a-chain of husbands, I - see no reason why she should omit the respondent, if he actually did - marry her.The respondent and Manteni .habará must have had a lot to hide, and their credibility, as per record left much to be denired. Even if it were straight forward to • onclude, that the- respondent did pay the said bride price, and married-her, and I have concluded he did not, he appears to have slept on his rights for a period bordering over twenty years, during which he knew, or he must have known, that she had be-enhangin, husbands, as oin smoker changes cigarettes. I think itis unfair to unburry a claim, that has for several generations, been left unraised. The suit should have beèh dismissed by the Court of first instance. In view of the above, the appeal is allowed with costs.