19810729 TZHC Dar es Salaam

L/R I7 TH:1 HIC-I-i COUTT 07 ZiiIL LT I)d. l'Ji JP.'1 JU7ISDIC lION 67 CCUdP 17 1711:11 .611177 110 77 07 1979 .ii: IJAL c:si p: 67/ OF 19 76 OF lii 017.17107 COUFT OP 610700700 I)71TPIC6 ill 70600011.0 BEFORiL) :i1 UFLGIL 6S( 9 0 41•n t ':. ?--- 6NCT1 61611711 LYA M1:7 703171 App:rTL!uT versus T1E REP 17110 00000 900,0q0 00,000999 9090000 000 !17SLOIIDENT JD0EMIDNT MNZJ1WPP, J0K. The aprollant otie ohrgedt wItli and convicted on four counts of stealing by rvint c/ss 265 and 271 of the Pour 1 Code arid sentenced to S :yenre ie.pr:rsoiun:rt on each ouiit - concuprdnt senrioes lie is apecaltrig rigainetcth the convictions raid the ntences nposed, .. S n lode 10:7 :eeTaOr0iJ..th2. of sereal 11:e accused rgue that the handwriting sod c i lia dire on lie mint voucher proucd 111 CouPi in support of 7-1 chargoc) nero not proved is .115. Tipet 7-IC 7r00nni )nfrilod to prove that it. was he wIre land stolen tIm. r:!e:i:; lInt tlac LimlJ?(:urlOfl land teulibe- rabely v;ibl:b.cld screw es:LJ race cc is to cause It: ho undoing name that tIre lmiirnmrd -L::ieIL riagistratu 176: lauled to circcu..aie rind to tire lire: tint 11 wee upon tIre snorocution to pac:rctin criSe 77-Tond all reasceribie doubt. I.aoi117icm rrpeellrue;rriered that the 1r1011 couit CmJlTCd in believing tire two it:meeooe (1712 and 1614) that the7 iderlified lie. ?aincIviiing rand 5-, In r:luttrl lIp, ifroaau learned eLate attonroy, supnc:rtcm 17. hotip the. conviction arid the se:.te:acwe :L:oe17. Itwth the leerried counsel s sub- fli5S1Ori ithe 5117 eweur o on voicatherli mr ad eluatol identified as accuecd; sionturos. It one else arned that tIer.5- was sufficient evidence in ci c c cacd - 17 nccii17 the oncy wI'ijcri 9 ii ci arrcJ be had enbosolemI, it :lao riot in dispute that at the tiers of lie nra -. ad airai'::ai...:nb tIre eocm :et was oripioud by nniii Pica], Co:oaoration a:: a Pearl aroorintarrt in 1Tbro7orb. Oric 17:adi Ledrcair, (pw.) . told one lower oouc rov ho ieeovoredr slaortur.o oat she. 20,000/= poon after be had talon over accused s 6LI7-CC of Tonal Icc ouubar::t, IL rrrpted his discovery to higher authorities oP iI'm corporatioli arid there unon wheels of unvootJ-grn on o'ei'e put in uo'en. - - iitrntai: nud±tor (p71), wa detailed to ijdjt accused ' boo of accoüllt and, occordthç to h± evidence in the lou ourt hç ta on Tour U .'cnt 'c.eio:.e the accused rccived mo ohs. 264,000/ 011 2:rnin( tv?ellty pairiont v ocro - 1i1 its . - Al aciaiow1eding rt;coipt of the money. Thi.e ironey was, from t4iq qvidenea, received by the accused from one of the Cd±poration fai QailQd Paii Sisal ta There was also evidence that between tha 15th of Ap: 1973 Q e 28t-h Juxe 1973 the aecused had withdrawn from the bank a total 8f 6.iis96O/ as per th&rexi payment voucher prodv,cecJ, a8 exiibit LI - L13. The tot3. ount drawn by the accused was therefore sho 264 7 000. + she. 96,000 Shs. 360 9 00/. It was jo ev:td'eioc Qf the luterl Av.di'or, (Ii), that h fOÜM that the acc had 8pont a toal of 40000/ out of sh 360,*/ That acant th t the accused hov.ld hv'e a balance of sho. 20 1 o0o/ cash. Appathi,s money s o wex'e to b& round, The acousd had aet e handed the noney to his siAdcessor in offioe, nat the imd':;:itin . einature o. the iayiecnt cio'ichers (Vhoae money wc mis siri) was acoued 's was ip),.y shown by k1ly rtr±dad± TJatj rJ4), the cashier at Pangarie Sisa, estat. TJ 'fJitfles:3 told th Court that he was convc:esari with aecuoed o 2iLnaturo and haiidwriting becaio he, (Qceusec) used o sian in his preseuncb very ofton And- what ic - en more distirbiir thce wore paTaent vouchers which ner: not c-rtered iri the caL:-look by the aouscd; -. arid, apparently, thse payim..nt vouchers are no oth' than those whose mopy was fou'id to he m:t3sin. Thc evide:ce of .iadi Lcdaun (V?2) was aioo to the effect that the acoaed had tolephoeed bin from Tnni:. nd as}:ed him riot to reval anything ho found add in the office to the audiIor. If this evideree is anything to ga. by the accused should iiot have behavd in that ianner unloc he imew that there was something uriusua. with hs a000tuitinj boobs. Needless to aentiori the evidence of IICriOi (T1), the chief 'intemal uditar, which was to the cffect that the accuseL had admitted to h1.m that he had a shortage of betnen 23 to 25 thousand shil1ing. Tac±fl iflt6 accau-nt the end ence onin, that the ac.cimed omitted to enter the po yieenb. iochcrs in the oresh-eooj, the fact that the ccusod fniod to, aopoln for tbo eum of sho. 20,000,= and the evidenoe that all the is1ng- nony was in the hands of the. e.ccused when it diclappeaie.d the , iescapab1e. :1c45,ipfl, ie that the acansc.d appropriaied the nohoy.. for thp cent,'Kng.,q,q klpqqjqd 2 the oitl setefc of 5 corc irrason nt is the Al IO1OII1 ilfVf 6 c.7YJ7 'LFTVD 1 C)E i eX,T4O LTT. n :r:TT) )C LO TcIth qm t;t turi oqr[a ; et tp o ouu vmtcuT et uo4oes ou:o 3q1 J O: UT1ILTU S, Ioq",,pulamj.