mahelo vs republic 1982 tzca 4 4 june 1982
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: Mustafa. J.A., Mwakasendo, J.A. and Makame, J.A« ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 24 OF 1981 B E T W E E N MAHELO MGUMBE ..................................... APPELLANT A N D THE REPUBLIC . ............. .. . • . •>......... RESPONDENT (Appeal from the conviction of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- mahelo vs republic 1982 tzca 4 4 june 1982
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 1982
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: Mustafa. J.A., Mwakasendo, J.A. and Makame, J.A« ) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 24 OF 1981 B E T W E E N MAHELO MGUMBE ..................................... APPELLANT A N D THE REPUBLIC . ............. .. . • . •>......... RESPONDENT (Appeal from the conviction of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Munyera, J.) dated the 14th day of March, 1981, in Criminal Sessions Case No. 26 of 1981 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT MUSTAFA, J.A.: The appellant was charged with and convicted of murder. He was alleged to have stabbed the deceased on a Christmas night in 1978. There was evidence that at about midnight he was trying to enter the hut of P.W.5 in order to sleep. The appellant had before that night been sleeping in the hut of P.W.5 for whom he had worked as an employee. When P.W.5 heard the knock and understood that the appellant had wanted to come in to sleep, P.W.5 told the appellant that there was no place for him that night as P.W.5 had another guest. The appellant then pushed and broke down the door which fell on « the guest of P.W.5, and he was the deceased who was sleeping on the floor. The deceased got up and pushed the appellaht out. The appellant re-entered the hut and the deceased again pushed him out. Immediately thereafter the deceased • exclaimed that the appellant had stabbed him with a knife. The deceased fell down and died almost instantaneously. ... / 2 - 2 - The cause of death was a stab wound on the left neck, causing severe haemorrhage. The appellant ran off and was arrested the following morning. Both P.W.5 and his wife P.W.7 stated that they recognised the appellant as the man who attacked the deceased. They had known him a long time and according to P.W.7, after the first entry by the appellant into the hut, she lit a koroboi, and after that the appellant made his second entry. P.W.5 and P.W.7 also recognised the voice of the appellant and P.W.7 certainly saw him clearly when the appellant entered the hut that night. Mr. Lakha for the appellant has submitted that the circumstances for identification were not favourable- and there could be doubt who the attacker of the deceased that night was. He submitted that the prosecution witnesses and the appellant himself had partaken of intoxicating liquor that day and night and they could not see or hear and identify properly. We have given due consideration to this aspect, and weiagree-with the trial judge that the appellant was properly identified by both P.W.5 and P.W.7 to whom the appellant was well-known. However, we are also satisfied that the appellant stabbed the deceased in the course of a struggle. The appellant, quite obviously not very sober, was ejected by force by the deceased and in the course of such ejectment pulled out a knife which he obviously was carrying and made a stab at the deceased in the dark outside the hut. We are aware that the weapon us°d was a knife, but we also take into consideration that the stabbing took place in the midst of some sort of a struggle, and that both the parties were certainly under the influence of drink. The appellant could have struck as he was provoked by being forcibly ejected. . . . . /3 - 3 - We think that the offence for which he should have been convicted was manslaughter, as there was insufficient evidence of malice aforethought. We allow the appeal, quash the conviction for murder, set aside the sentence of death passed on the appellant, and substitute therefor a conviction for manslaughter. We sentence the appellant to five years' imprisonment. Before we conclude we must point out that in the record, there was no medical evidence as to the cause of death. No doctor testified, nor was the post mortem report, which is on the Preliminary Inquiry proceedings^exhibited or produced at the trial hearing. In some cases such an omission can have serious consequences. In this case, however, the deceased died almost immediately from the stab wound, and the evidence of the cau^e of death was sufficient in the circumstances. ~ 3AL.A.AM this 4 th day of June, 1982. A. MUSTAFA JUSTICE OF APPEAL Y.M.M. MWAKASENDO JUSTICE OF APPEAL L. M. MAKAI1E JUSTICE OF APPEAL r jce f • ( L. A. A. KYANDO ) DEPUTY REGISTRAR