19820129 TZHC Tanga
- et. trr axt qoTum 9dojo wpoue 9ntrpuoo o iuTtl MOTIt o. !..IflO3.qq. sAxd utieddt eiq ttoddt ;o sUOtei stt u TtXOS .t UO-STATa Ttanq.TnOTa2V 011q. JO .XiOijO ut (d) Tanqlq ledstr eixo Sq auo -p sum sdoao pTcs eq- JO erLtA Kat4guom JO SULXO. UT .uowssessv eu 'pepitt SuAk put peu1pa upuodso.x aqq. tjOpM JO GnTUA OGT...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19820129 TZHC Tanga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 1982
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
- et. trr axt qoTum 9dojo wpoue 9ntrpuoo o iuTtl MOTIt o. !..IflO3.qq. sAxd utieddt eiq ttoddt ;o sUOtei stt u TtXOS .t UO-STATa Ttanq.TnOTa2V 011q. JO .XiOijO ut (d) Tanqlq ledstr eixo Sq auo -p sum sdoao pTcs eq- JO erLtA Kat4guom JO SULXO. UT .uowssessv eu 'pepitt SuAk put peu1pa upuodso.x aqq. tjOpM JO GnTUA OGT q-i pe o.IGA& .'seexq. -ti put o;QD zrivu ut luauuuued eaut.otij jo oaos tsdoao snot.TuA poT.Id utncr uqqq. pUt J3t1tJ s 1 uopuods.x ovq. 'srj iq p4tAT.Tno fl. J0 ZTbAtJUT etOtA O. paip.XO StM .uapuodx aT4 1 uaqM çL61 ITIT fStM putt jo td Mots uoctn qot o. papooxd put peqørrq4sa pUflOj sXflOØ. I!.OI tO;q tl 3 TM sou; ot .rT PXOtI 0t[M -çt 4.UOPTSGII Gxlq.iq pesGTusTp StM ZanOo 3TcJ it ;O 1tddt ic[ctt et Otta 0 OttSTh - Jo ZflO TXILXd iTIP • .q lwulladdu Ot1 Ut pOA 9tM dqsJGwAO esOtM putt GOGTd t uo S.UeWaAOJdUtT ponttxatm iOj: uott8udto. 9L, Ostle JO t pp.xtMt StM q.uepuode'et. •ttoctdt ptxooas t :r'tTs inawaan (jjtrtT 3T10) • - - 1iaaLIOcIa& . IcuEWtH iaigvu (txtpue;aa '?TJo) • , ... • 'wrixulms ItivVH (5L6t J0 t 'oi •ITI.To tnoo Lxttrç put) L6t; 0 ot 'O ttdd ttAt oqot s nr TtuT3TJO oz) • L6t jo .8 ON 'Ivaaav flAlO • - • • - ; Vf) NVI tiv VIRvztTVUT TO LUflOO HIII 71THITI fl1 •-• - 2 - shamba without paying for them. No point of law is raised by him worth any consideration by this Court Needless to say it will be folly on the appellantts part to expect him to eat his cake and have it at the same time, In SO far as the evidence establishes that the crops under tluerry were cultivated by the respondent and/or his father and that when they did So they were not trespassers then the respondentts ontitleiuent to compensation is a foregone conclusion and very sound in law Since there is no querry on the assessment itself I will now proceed to dismissthis appeal and this I do with costs (H.E.D. S3ya) Judge 29/1/82 N.B.: Judgement to be typed and sent to the senior Magistrate •t Lushoto for fte]:Iveryt.o th paxties the :paties Should also be notified tho -t whoever is dissatisfied may appeal, with leave, tothe Court of. appeai ,• (H.E.D. tsy) Judge 29/il82