19820602 TZHC Mwanza
OTT Ru pççsnq çpw pmqq ' tMn vf, TU TqPJt 0[T quxM)[ flUr2;12u 'iiI Z)( TPTz Au;eui-gu - TSTS12I XOW - TITcp( em qnu1 r4 TZTPTSU1 2Mn)[U TWTUI ortq jji :onb i pup 'pçs aq UoirTp 4Pq4 UT Pup 'sxA EL PabP PbeR2TJ snsTpnrj ui ;oddns SPUTJ pUPI OTTqnd lied UAT6 sum ;uoTidcT zq - a Tv aqq UT pUtU19 pue g sqTqTLjxa ;b f,4...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19820602 TZHC Mwanza
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 June 1982
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
OTT Ru pççsnq çpw pmqq ' tMn vf, TU TqPJt 0[T quxM)[ flUr2;12u 'iiI Z)( TPTz Au;eui-gu - TSTS12I XOW - TITcp( em qnu1 r4 TZTPTSU1 2Mn)[U TWTUI ortq jji :onb i pup 'pçs aq UoirTp 4Pq4 UT Pup 'sxA EL PabP PbeR2TJ snsTpnrj ui ;oddns SPUTJ pUPI OTTqnd lied UAT6 sum ;uoTidcT zq - a Tv aqq UT pUtU19 pue g sqTqTLjxa ;b f,4 ToTquaLjqnp e ; OS DBUTWTeTD 92M upuodse A;TeA 04 ODUaPTAa ZAt?b D puo e sqqx3 uç pUoUU SULU 0 @uOu TT -Ps Pup 'PqTTTN L1 t.tflr1 sop Jou 'Pu2T pOwTeTo supuodsai aqj jo saTiopunoq MOUj uee qOu Dtp gewnr '4Toi aXTT SSSeUTM .1tO 9t4 dT4SUMO OO4l.tU ST4 MOS o; §utodind 'IUflqT1 oçi4çq1 CLfl. ao;eq ATPawTPT 0 SflUTW qxa pu 'TZOI5 aLP ao;eq ueje. AIP 0 U1 TOIc S nu -çw qx ;o bUzepUe; ST4 PePnTUT qeLIq AUOS s;upuodset aqq wc; qjedV euis aq4 o. peique sem WeTTadde eq. OaogaaaLjq pup 4 L96T tuo; SP ; s aq4 Aq POWDOTTQ St4 42q4 'put uodo UP ATaaulaaffsr quqq uoçuçdo eM4 01. awpo 4 4anoD JXU1Td -)q ° t SM pu eSOqM SM I anssT aq4 1 paqvToajdde StflOD teMOT 0M4 otIq S'f 50 X) AeqP eSTM.e4;O i;Uno uewdoIaAep CbIITA ueq eq Aq '1Tq 0 1. P2DOII Ueeq p214 4 2t.4 pu2 - D -tqnd 52M euios eq 'q; PeUIT2TD QJQTTOdCIp oqq 'pseo.td .uepuodse.-7 eqq. s * 0 0;900 efl 4 sdoao quoupuij,-d u -ro,eq; pe4u2Td PU2 4 eUI2S aqq PO4PATqTno 'fldSTP UT Pt oq ;o uossessod I OUT ;uer 'po.t eq4 pessoiz 4ueTT@dC;.0eq. 4 qpqq 'ertdsip ut OU U252 ST qj 'asP-PPPi sp oq pleet eSMeqO - 2ja uuiiecj at4q Ut ..itnq peaj aLiq cq p o,rncies qnq 'peseq.uo bueq sç 42q; PUPT Oq4 5UTUT0Cp2 SOM PUuT S*T2d 2SO)j2 ){DT2d 25o)j2;nw wo; puvj qy4bnoq ocbtw P--MmPS 4UPTTadd2 eq 44eq4 azre PfldSTP jou aip qeq4 'sloe; tflO AT2Wd aqq 1q 4TM ITPaP TTOM sum 4T pU2 'suOT4e0TTduioD ou soq esoo stqj .ueui5pnç s;xnoz T1STP aqq qsuTebp 6 qjnoo sTq4oq p000dCIo 5014 OJbTW PI2MP3 ;u2IIadd2 3q. MÔU IDUf °tflOD ;TTP tfl. O In;sszns 2 aDuCq Pue 'PCIT UCT 2 DqI •dTqtCUMo BuTaTnbop Aqeioq. bodojo queu2miad pä;u2d eq 4DT4M UT IpueT 9T14 pop2An0 PUp 'uodn pep2oIDu9 pu2 'se -tepunoq aqq pesso pq 'oAe5ç,j paPmPS queTTadde eq '42qq 6UTWT2ID lqjnoo 'T.d oTAU2 i oro;eq s5utpeeod paqn434suT OW2ArqI , Ie4SeATAS 4u@pUodsnj eqj; - ' . f 'flJflJ,y)j Nl4afli °pUQq :wIv'I 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 J1tI2CN0dS2i 0.... .. ......... ..... OWVX)IflN IIOVA1VS s ns eA 0 0 0 00 0 INVqqZddV P ................ .. . . 00 S SO* S 0 *0 0 U1VMQ2 (21XLSISVW Ji.DflLlsia '•OS 'VJ2255n 'N ' :260d 8L6t ;o ZS 'ON PseD ITATD ;.rno Jtowttd 061U2j I 2 UT5 pO - 8L61 3 0 EVE 'ON 1ddy TTAT UT OqOjn5 le 2qojr5 9 0 4JnOD 40T.74STP eq; JO. UoTST 0 p aqq ULOJ) 6L61 90 9E1 O ON TI2dcW 'IIALD (cd) TZNVMW J,v YINVZI1J1 ao IHnOD HIH 2H1 NI -2- The ,above was given supporting evidence by DW. 3 Joele.., who further said, without cross examination by the respondent, thus and I quote:- "VDC iliamua ipate nafasi hiyo ifungue shamba, nyakati hizo tulikuwa watendaji, village executjve officer ambayc iü shahidi No.1, wa mdaiwa, nih- mwagiza aeride ampe nafasi aliyopata, ndipo mdaiwa akapewa ihe árdhi na kufungua, shamba mpaka sasa ni zaidi ya miaka 10 hakuna raalalamiko yaliyotokea" These were local laaders, and I am sure, as they say they knewthe extent of public land. It is also clear, that, it was the village authority VDC that, allocated the piece of land, to the appellant. And from the above I am satisfied the land was public, and accordingly allocated, and there was therefore no encroachment by the appellant as alleged. The appeal is allowed with costs. E. W. KATITI 2 T/JUN.E r 19 8 2 • i.\ JUDGE \p /