19830818 TZHC Mbeya1

r2tr peao i hq 11Tp 04 1t{M T4TL UO.ItA ?UT4O,. .&u ees PrP 94 °H oeioo o •(pesnoo si) teiVnq etfl. .103 eOtJJo oqq. UT T .JeI pu L/I/t7 pe-p /9/07z/1ns/ui imoct ei eo.x OsTle °H p9SflOO S.X1'J OLfl O. S 51 ec, OcT 0tfl TC OS S TTnJtA e T P4 94 pe14rttrpt ooq WTIodd pTs s14 uç pjj aeqq.OUV .103 9 °fl 0 4 eqq. Aq PaPU G11aaddv s& eq .bofl0o o1 u0Meq,.10J uo ocIsu'B.1; .xoj qptef pOtiZSç eq pu JVIIn;L(T ozti eqq qq.rtoq pq eq q13qq peq4tErp .p9$nO SJTJ Otfl. eOUeJep rçeqq. UI 5ziq eqq eotzeq ezrou eq; pezes pu eq. ;u pa&Taz1u (rI) p1p'T ooctSuI poxep trç'&i. 9t4 e.Ioje •ZU& 0 eZTE?rJ eqq .I0dtIC.q. O tIO&. M1tBX e pe)[OOq Ueqq. 9TJ /T/t7 JO 9680 qcIT900.1 0TS fl.TP 0 flS 8 T P PU1[ ODOTMON t30.IJ IOJ9Z 11I JO s.ic oc .noq 'pucTj. 'TJJ( q-s;Daog eqq. irt sle pepxooe.i s vM 04M pesno3 TsaTJ OLfl. /T/j7 u qoi.iq eu ms etj. Jo .xedeaj UMOpO eq. pasmou paE etq pur 'trpizd DIN eq. jo .1eBu -qou eag eq. S treTTe (1cI'2 eq. qmfl. peei9e pie q.noqm& sJJms eus eqq. JO UOt.IOctSUeJq. et . rsno xoj k [!~ u -coC pe2zqo aaam pesnoo eq. P Txe rT-[edd etq PtXt 3TU!.1ed.3 flO4.TM T'4U°P E)Aoqe eqj jo uo osuq e4. u-rrect a oj j un6o puoes eq. trr S TT ea9AOS pe2aqo Ue Updcry e41 3TJ eq cq PrSST tZLI0cr ttOtfltM q.6Tx r sTq ZUPh.r r1o13 (epmr jo sq oci) onpoztd tn4ynot.i2 ut.iodsutq. a oj p.rqo SttteAes SleM p6sn3o 49J13 e4 'pOSflOoB pUOOes eqq. st aj •s.xet4o OtAl, 4tL4 £utoç pexqo sv& u11ectd eqj r rirrxiia NDXIII2 * gL61 Jo TF 0N -OV oAIThi jo L puv fr -TIE Oslo qmied v jnoT jq pA sonpo.i -[L~x r4 Tno ,rx9v perj -çocrs jo uor.xoctsuxq.u itte tmo0 pu * cL6T .° iroff I- OF Tj eq. ;o L ptm c ess/0 .twqp& npoad r.porxv T..1OdS1X,3 e~ tmo o Isp.qf)g-fHO •0 .....• •. • • • . ........... .•. •• • orianar aFIL SIISY . 'bs 'tCrt. :eo;o ora1tsict vrrri io JU1103 11 0MISIC rmu ff 0 6T J O £ 0N SSTO TMDIIID TTNIDDIO • £6T t!IO c .or r jaV rrrrrao • (sTo eqT) - -" FIOM1DIctSflnf, 7 1171irlavarf / VIMVZMVd d0 LTEflOO HIH rlqHLT ['II •' :-' ' Y • • convicted the first accused an. tne apcllait and. acquited the 3rd accused. lie sentened the firstacused'nd. the appollant to the fine of Shs 2, 500/= or 6 months inprasonr ent. with full respect to thc learncd trial &Q0 ate I do not comprehend his reasons for convicting the apIllant. It 'was uhiesputed that he lawfully sold. the 150 tags to the fiist accused fo va1ue. The law requires that any person who want to transport sified foodstuff must et a permit from the N.M.C. Th appellant was th4 i3ranch ivianager of the N.LI,C. He was the Corporation's repreeertative aA apanda. It was he who was empowered to issue ,pen.its. He had issued thC: one (Bth. I).1) to the first accused to enable him transport the maize he had bought. It appears the appellant was convicted and punished for oxcercising the powers the law has authorised him to e:ercise. If there was nybod.y having qualms for what the appellant did he should have lodged his complaint to N.I.C. head office or elsewhere but not to a criminal court. The appellant committed no offence knorn to law. I allow the appeal, que the appellant's conviction and set aside the fine ofShs.2,500 Al order that it be refunded to him. I now turn to the first accused. drasto 11,01 1 who has not appealed. I am of the view that had he ai;poaled his appeai vulc1 have succeeded. He bought the maize lawfully. The permit had been 1 eued and the train had not yet moved. By the tine it L.,O ed he would have lready collected his permit. Like the appellant, he' .ommitted no of cnc. haown to law. In execise of my revisional po:erk,I quash his convition, set aside the fine of Shs. 2, 500/= and order t'at the sonic he refl nd.ed. to him. I / F. A. LUN'YBRd, JUDiL. l8/F/83 OFDEB: I order that the 150 1. js of maize or their value thereof be restored to the first ocused. Brasto Elaziku. At libeya, 18th .iugust, 1983 Fl JUBG..