19830211 TZHC Mbeya
- .I.; O$ ;u qs. tP- i-t' c' 'rr nJTM 8 1 r (4à1 S1t- UI UOT t) TO SUTLC32 UO 4tTtOO UT Strr'joOOZrI O.ZOAT ql PTTJ ITTTkTSOOn T'I WePU09 )L Ol UTOS 7'T fl - otIS A1.s 4 S.tTT( ULJ.WtT T MD 5bO.9T fl. j.o 4qtr'tpr. ccj ja 4tLi 7. 96TJ 0 61'T urr cis'to Jo sriq tTqoq tt U P.TT'2O. 4it tio cxop tn pjZo pPTqtro...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19830211 TZHC Mbeya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 1983
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
- .I.; O$ ;u qs. tP- i-t' c' 'rr nJTM 8 1 r (4à1 S1t- UI UOT t) TO SUTLC32 UO 4tTtOO UT Strr'joOOZrI O.ZOAT ql PTTJ ITTTkTSOOn T'I WePU09 )L Ol UTOS 7'T fl - otIS A1.s 4 S.tTT( ULJ.WtT T MD 5bO.9T fl. j.o 4qtr'tpr. ccj ja 4tLi 7. 96TJ 0 61'T urr cis'to Jo sriq tTqoq tt U P.TT'2O. 4it tio cxop tn pjZo pPTqtro ttAt1iYt!lOM .. 13r rcqj 'utttnss AT• N \. .7 . I OWpTttOO QCTS 'oc upuortsx eq, icq .q o. puuoo .InAU -. ut uiJo.& 3 tjq. Jo oout otrarzztu-r JTL osTuoor • \<t.Jrz ou sop tL6v JO L3?J..otfq. ' PT1AOU)T 1"T O 9SO itXS U1{ \\ s4 etqtq T.TT pW ro, Ts ex oqq, VtJves JO UPUTJ S, inc•i rLfl UqtM tJJtp O'Tv IT OJ STSq OU SPIA 'OttO t!TEt tTtOO E r T iTJ ?tTOr iFJ C S'JOOS .. Aiuthastxoo qoc srrq -'r— Jx&r oqo p'un'x Rtr7 oq. ptu • qou s& ptIoct?ni etq. -r -- ; qtraTTotJ 'uaruoctsot ot .0tutit3q\I. c'q pO A TQ jje nTIj Tnsssoons ç p - cI'ki u,rtxoctsi ctj icItd.pu £ITTç arT ita eiql ¶XtMop Sv aaqq.0a0 qi srq An rTr'cT uoq 'UtI tOTtrM =/oogst,g pu i ; o jo p-eot r1;o uxrlx .xo; jetq rrt q - trno At. UOtA% squotr wino; noqv xoJ L6r '!w trç J-çM. sçt pTzttuT et tic sg k.ou.1) 3fl S 1 toqo.Iq s Tt 2T4 SITrTto UDTqo xnc tqri pssq s riztri • lyljVreTT9ddv bTlI pe-tizr rvtf 'tor" - iou ttto.xq s 1 9.ti0puo's0z Ptjj . L OW - _ •..••-.0...f .......... St1StOA I H UTrrrrtrr I i(6L6T/6'oNr f'T'r TTATI UT JO tTt3 OTISTcr tfl JO VOTSTOOP ntj. rio.x) 6L6t sn flr -t-r rrr (od) -. 'INr7r' TO flCO FDIH MTIrT, , -NT .1 H L.. L,. .7, (2) into the propriety of those ocedind's bit even assuin o.Lin without acceptin , that hc ha inhrit ior as a wifu ariL lived witl' hr for four months, as hj C1aILS, nd tin 4iorcua her, h still fulu net untitlea to r3tuTn of uowxy bauso she already had hal•rn with her decased i1uSbLiflj. ±1e 522 01 tilO customary c'.ation 11lOS says that where a woman who has had children. (d o: /aiive) with hr husb;d-1u is divorced uoViry is not r,fuiciablc. Thu iriiar y Court was therefore ridht in refasin to order refun of an y i 1rt f the dowry paid. . . I allow this apeal by quaethig the ocision of the District Court and set aside. the order of refau of jart ef th dowry. The appellant is entitled to his costs in ti!dS c,art end in the ccarts below. C- JUnGj.