19840928 TZHC Mbeya1
4 ' •• i ' - , I//c jfj:, I Iii(ii COtJ Oi :LNzANrA Tj:) Ti:3LXAE JUiXIC'IOi ( GIsTFY) .' I I i4i.-• CPLtNiL iV. 94 or 13L - c S OR]GI tJL CRILII OF 1 92 - O3 TEL DISTRICT -UR2 O DISTBCT AT -r ii. ]:,, Toht]1a, a,4Resit1e1it CAS3XJJ'T JY;D SOO .. A1LAkT . . r L Veisus A JBJC 3 C. :;.. . - ... . ChaRGE Ste1jw hr ern...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19840928 TZHC Mbeya1
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 1984
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
4 ' •• i ' - , I//c jfj:, I Iii(ii COtJ Oi :LNzANrA Tj:) Ti:3LXAE JUiXIC'IOi ( GIsTFY) .' I I i4i.-• CPLtNiL iV. 94 or 13L - c S OR]GI tJL CRILII OF 1 92 - O3 TEL DISTRICT -UR2 O DISTBCT AT -r ii. ]:,, Toht]1a, a,4Resit1e1it CAS3XJJ'T JY;D SOO .. A1LAkT . . r L Veisus A JBJC 3 C. :;.. . - ... . ChaRGE Ste1jw hr ern a, 65 271 of the Pzwl £oLe.. -- $ TtjDG± LiTT r . ' 5 \ J• D-A.HATI J, r Te appellant C - IiV L'RD SOLO wj's cvicteJ. of t h e offence of ç. stealii by servant conLrry. to see tiqns 7l -Of -the Jenal Codo.. He was sentenced to a toxiii of iisoqntr o - th.ee yrs. Lenoe -th appeal. in r The eviaenoe ihipl ras 1 d by c]iooecudon ir tO Uhe effect on 27582 the aje11a hzd p tcot (M1u dhlfO,/ fr r r euspected to be usoci foe -stcalirA suet.n fon. TA2M2Jk Pi4no p)t 't , ............................ - Lugalo whei'e a?peflcrlt ii$'1. The apel?.p wio at TAZLi L ri 1ie U .. kit .:.'- plzn at Lugalo as a ,&Lo opertor. Op 25 2 YJ,4 a11ant ti a plaetio contai.ne whict7h $k O the plirit at Lug -'1, 4c vio .- wow ws exp1oyed as a c.civce cook the elldrJlttbff3uty, the QlL - n 34,L1 had this theplasto coxja.tnr 'JI ipd to hive oono op i wat A..4 was suspLojou and jie nfoz'ied Iu Ibs Siiidn ICw.a fl 2 - iS i sue- picions 2112 was cn 4 ps..st nt upe&'vis at T1ZA1i 1>3p11 at I'u jlo oil Station0 On receivjn.s rjs iffoation iT,2 arrmnec w -t1i .4 to trap the a)pe3.lantfr On 27.5.82 the day P4,4 Tfiforn c f .2 cioi t Lj Si 'F r.''-: •-:'-- 8U8piCiOflS, the jjel]iLr. ra wrth his uep1tistic eon aine \ihiAA hç$ specia'. 4b1ack t- aai'-• ,Jvn ortthci 1r11 T P 6 1 anatln or e oe TAW11A Pipej.ines saw the e e13 tnl with the pD,cic c&ner. Ior1 w n xc A 1- o as usual jrom 3 .ri, ti1 9 D9p t1 e a -n eni bo veue1e driver by 2,4 in er to back ou;i h1 hjf norucI j ended at 11 p .. '.4 ed w'tk i 1 tj o pY a ci u. when the alt41jant, was in th,6 ve -i1cle.The, ,P ri(ae , . '...-..-L'-• 1tit on and off te lht aidp the a' Caine to th 1cndiover ens, 1, aaoy,ree the iJu arbi c uT 3. ic14,i th sonic 20 litres of SAE Ol .Jo.)O, mhen 'zked :-J4 ar'3 h€ --' el1rt to dw to the owner of the ]tc conta chohe of theu said he cbc1 aot know. hen ihe o1j were cori'cte a.n bo -t1 and ape1lart were chztr€ed, L - er 3'.4 tas dch."rcd anhG beeaae C roscution itnos, The ap5 .en1ed havi any b1ue pktic co itainer 1 i-Ic saio. that he had oarriet 4 cefl plastib oonttiner which 'e..on'ed to one Kitosi a. fellow employec. On 27.582 h rebM f wxt at 3 p,m. cud althou gh he was to o off duty at U. ),Ifl, he asked to be allowed to o oT duty at 9 4 p.n, because he was unawell, 'hen at 9 p.n. he went and sat in the vehicle driven by th 1•4 1 '1hen they stted novin..I.-2 stop them. Then P 1 2 saw the blue plastic contnner which had oil. hen asked as to whom it boloned the appeInt and: the 1,4 eaolisaid -that they i.dnot now Then they we both chartee oirtly. —r The learned tzial IIagictate was satisfed that the coiier which was tonddered a n d a&u.tt d as xh "i belonged to- iTe ppllob a'd thftt o the iiateriI. dz i5h t.e1lar had it. also found t- the of i'QU4 in the plastic çon-afl,er was stolen from TAZANA Pxpeli1es t 1 Lu- lo puiip ft hee±ote otht! ielant ui1iy as chrCd thet the 611pidic -it retly ei±ered tho land Rover with the ol. The cp.1aiit U et 01I4 Vricda grounds of appeal cha.11en31n convicñiou, In tessed that the evidence of .i- 1 4 was rict tici4a, ho uljabj beIa1ae hQ hac1 t)een a co-accuse The Republic su oxted the anvj.ction ziin that ihat s inportant was the ovne7 of th -1Msi-c cDrrta!ue r. 1Cap.na lexd °ite -ttoney alco pointea out about the evj4enoo of 1' 1,4 vjr-i'v-is that bf X 7 ,2 and s'id that P',4 world not he.'-e info rmad hi boss j. he tqanvol'ved; r In this case there is evidence from ?t,4 to the effoc 1h't he saw the appellant with a blue plsti---contanier on 26.5.32 d 27,5.8 id on 27.502 he intorea h.s b1n &ncl a tra to catch appalLnG was ppa'éd- I aee with the C2ellCn h tP ,4 oah be decribec as ' - i ccon4e =a that his evidence hov1 1 e V.ewed ath caution. it the. the eztic'ene of IM4 as to the osses'on by a eIlettThf the plastic container ri 21,5,02 is at'only orrobo tec? by thct of I_~Y. zw.6 is eLphC tic aid ho srti clearly that he saw the a ))elanb- cry.n a blue plastip The container' was empty by the lok of it'. Th0 c9ntalner tch. $ PW 6 jdentfied in cou.ci. i.h. "L" s the c6n1r .0 v!or'I,6 'rZaé xot shaken it his eviience by the —exatirntion Aion the other lb of the atory of W4 is crro1orated y te evidence of P.2, Wh t he Police decided to charge .fl • 4 c1od not how t1t his evidence is false, the evidence of i'-'. cro orat tht of-i4 oihoi4 he ot suepiciou d • decided to lay a tj and .b appellant, trn,d in the rehic1ewith the blue cctairer i1 ich h i' 1iew cn e'rrrn by 2 .4 nc i2 .6, an th?container had fl The eli -u wc ic 9 .m. just like the previous day- '- .26&.82 The -, :oliant' he. lllowe. to leave at 9 p.rn. oi 6.5.82 bUn n 27, .3. Ij hiJ't nomally orded at 11 u.n. S then to)d Jic, vnnale camc roci the olue arranged coteiner, ich we have seen i on d to tlae Th 1Deli ent. iver i. 1• had been inftied that the a olThrt h <' COLIC to wor1 with a ilue pies cic contai- ner. ,,- •• -' Ji. thathe appellant dic1 to t as stron piooution vlc'?nce ua to dn that he lictid been crryii a 'bluecontainer. He adruttedcar3 a green container which belon e to one itosi. his was no doubt o lane atteint to dscrcit and co'fuse the )rosecut,on never Called t1os to confrn or Ceny the story of he cotaino. Like the lca1&. -trial u trale, 1 an also satiified that the c,hrge- was eatab1ishei eyo 'in-j reo' le doubi. There c ul i'ot be any ................ ----- . . .-. tion of who had put the lue co ita er with the oil i1,.e l'i 4dver once the tory f the prosocution wltnossos is believed. It h tQ be the ape llant,# The a ell.nt clad. oo-r a that uone one had takei n lluo container and hiddei t. I lc-re0 bate ttoro chat although no one saw the .olnt ca:ry 'thc- blue plastic çotainer with th# oil into -the ypl4clo. the circuus'taeos of tL2 CaSe clelr pointed irreatatib)y to the ap -J .an'; ao th :on who had done so, here was evidence that thre waFashont';e o1 iO litres of SAE no. 30 oil in,. te TJIZANA PIPELIMS 611 I find, no merj±- the a. oal against conviction accordingly 1 - With regard to the .oe.l a'ainst aontenc.e t1a- lonod. 'Stte Attorney r, Kapinca euhuit -bed that TZiiA ?ipo1is : wason..eiied authority ond ae suc1 hO cas does not cone undcr the Ni-nintm Sentences Act. I have had an opo tunity to view'ct No.65 of 1966 which is given the follow.ng t i LtT' '7niw i1pel1fe 1 ct, 19661. Seton 3 of this act rads' "The ill ta:, nay by no'ico ijubl±:hed in the Crazette designate a co;wn'ir 'to be 'the conpary for the uupe-f rri5t) this Lot and Q oj y-tecj---flv EuLerOI 'é '±The powerb and ohall orforn t]a': duties vested in or juposod on -the c)r.)any - : T -a JOt. ): 'r' ' . . - - - Then by ov-rnaent a-ce ho.51 of l9(-7 the •Iinj ter :or ConhI]erce and Co—operative d siia'te' TZ-'tih Pinelines Lirilted as 'the conpany for the .ng to suggest tjrt ThZLtha k'.ipelines Linitcfi s a body corIoc' te establi- shed by or under any VAiten 1a: othcr than the Conpanies 0rd3nxé. 1?or the AbOVQ reasons it c1otr thit, T ZAW Pipelines Is not cificd authority as envisaged by Section 3 o f the I&ininum Sentenco 1 )72. It thoefore follows tht i t w wro on the part of the 1 'rned triv.1 to sentence th,3 ollat u&ier the ITininuri 3nieoes £CC because the offonce or wIic h he wa coiwitecL did noc fall under .ie 1 ofo-'c 1] I4jnfxiuia fltence 'ct. I will t 'side the acxiteice o1 C e- years and substitute thereof one o si onths ipi.i sonient, ince the appellant has been in pris i ly, 1''33 he hts 1i'e dy crved th entece of aii laoll1is un iu in . i hild be re1 from pruon forthwith ufljea bb1I under sorT other lawful cause. Th cLia1 aijnt fltCø in allewd In ,fl t JITL. The apjeal e 'ains - opnv- ctiøn is dtsu.ad. I. Bahati, JUDG., Ii 2E3.9.19e4 nt delivered i.. Cuu: ;. )jntrtti fo. the CJ)UL1(. For Appellant .. absen. . Bt JUDGi. 28.9. 1 964 'J1 COPY OP ifl ORl cDI L / DISzI!RICT