19840927 TZHC Mbeya

I]:T flj 1 ( rx1TyV ::: IT •'YI t OIflhiLLL;. L :.0, 76 C? 3 01TG-INLL CFJ I. 4LLI iC,, 250 193) OF J' DIJTICT 0tIr Cl' iGI RIC:' . S J. Deforo . , IkuitLu nec .Li ct itro. JS 1G: flOB1E.RY Iflt VIOLJ1TCr2: C/sá 235 nd 286: of th Penal Code • I'a•SIRI ttii/I 'WiCOflyLted. of the. offdAb& robbery with violenôe 1011trarLy to Lwns 9 65 an,O. 286 of the Pen1 al4q., and he viAh soMencd io seven e& inpsontient oiiOa -th1E' ag"int OiiCt].Ofl arid htenee. The tictb aLo mpte IIorierita ingi: bias going to b. netbøur 1 n on 22/11/8 in Stawana zs}it Shi 0A aoèàmpried by Irtaxy Lkanga ho hu9end V 0 S±StGt4VV ?4 ø/ 'dd t hG leasts. When they ot to th.. bus Itm.1a thr met iol= youllgaft in a gongs. The :leetin3 p1 V:a 1ihtl; off, the bui stad4: .t N dai' oner but ñQarby there 'u ot±1cit liht One yoi4j abeVP11A1 øyin he ao poibwe the notoriais in bQ4 Kanb%tb &t1e the appellant who wael also In this gan3 of V1h by •ft af 14ij. The a)pe11ant got thre and threatened f)V!1 with i t.tfe wiiich lit ha4 p telUng il not to resist6 Then the a7pellant put I'A 'A haid in-to ho4' treats and snavtchcd the ho, 8O0.- which was tuo.:oô. thez Itikther 'tuth 'abbd PI3 But r-%.1 Vas J- .qtvd and pulled the ppe1iat1l. to tho eleetricity 1it where she manaead to sV apellant c1ear1y he ppel1arit alashed he with sopethinC and she fail dbvj,. Th e gn.' zan Vfr1 he ret her huoband ga, p1i.J4 \V11VO is . Poltc Officor. :ho told ta't hdhaDpened. Then aa they were ;oin they se1 one •lias and ?4 asked 4liae if he knew Misri nd Karnpanbwe. Elias agreed and.. added tt he hd just net theta running away. T,4, 21.3 and PVV1.1 follcwecl where the tpDlLan - had one. They uar him and PW,4 apehende4fra, }ut the to slip orf and run awn.-. fIrst paLib\10 wa appr :ide.Thy J.4 theh the p .iioric n u roie1. i i a knife. .p1J4 truGled with th'apnellant but thc a cli L.aigedt esoape All the same PW.4 repertedo the Police tation anc aeilaut c\ent'ually arrested. Tachi Mteugul'who happend to pass by as PW.4 c struglin with Kampambro and apieUant ooiifimed that 2i•.3 an In c.ofence the a1.pellan id ir h not 1th two wonen who abused hiss. Pk ef the man who wa i n the . i. . P., .oked the ippellant. Then a btawlt. broke out between the apel1rit and r1i. Two peogle came to help 2 1 4 and the appell2nt thefl ri1 away. 'e wa reted after tuo dys. The appeUat saià in oro—exa.ination 1thit th two women were aad W.3 the appellant was known to then befQre the day in quetion. He a.so t4 that he ws not in bad teta rLh hc wren. The opeIlant said that he 'is lane and when P.4 kIdkoa hi ttffj ensued between the ap)eflanL and P\d. tt. The learned istrate ?lxeved he poe uti wi nessoe t.nd rejected the defence. i[o therefore cov.cea thc. appe1aut te charged. In his o.an1ui of oa1 the appo1ln et out 9 ounds of cppeal. Zia Cr ôuncis of appeal amount to .i1S thi't 'the evi.1ce of the prosecution was unreliable a'd ha the ap. iellan. had just oeen mod vp. The s ellri± also wn't on to s' i it' xounds of t1 €hi 11 the p.r ecutiqn tjthese were rolate -i thereforL thcr cvidce was incelble ar.. that he was neveridQ1tied at a identjfica.ionttradc. - The leouhlic upportod.?tho cc:victon truin. .thro I.Ndungu - lo!-Xnce , tate ttorner for the 0) L1ic that here was str,ot lint which nade ii coss,ible for the wisses to see thQ ap1lant, 1ir. Ndun-th. further.subni.tted that the conth,ct :..' '. .'1L . towax ' P.4 uppoted. the ovidnce of P.1 and. P.3 to the effect that the appefl.,ant had ôtual1y I see no ierit in t11 10 apo 1. T' e )2eUan' as sufficionty identified as te roubei bec -'use of the et-reet li€ht. 1hci after the a7pe1lant had rtni cwr th his gang he as cee'i ain tby Pi4 1 13 and iitI.1 and even by P 1 .2 cryin. bo save one F-aambwe whom W.4 hd rianaed trco nd to apprehend. The ftt that P,1 PJ3 aL4 are r1°tec does npt inke Oheir evidence los'- credible. kpt-hamore the'e i'no cv clencc. $0 the effect th.t P 11 2 i 'Isc eJated to theothr proeeottic wisse '1 u story given by 'the ' .11a' - in defence wa no be.iQirc by the learn&1 trial bg,strate. The learned trial IIageato za itit1ed to d.ioflse the ape1lait in the circurastances of th.is The ).earnd ta1 IL%cistrate, saw anc' - S £ harl tho wttnesses inci.Jni the pp9lla:. I crnnot nalr that he was in dLs13liaving the apcllant, rT.2 cloan: - said in hi ovience that came in ai& ' th "ajeIJ.an :i:.c in :Lhn .ay -the apollant escaped. ais coobrae what P1, Ab and I..- said Li alone that the appellant not alone. In ciew of the u-cry stio ce against the appellant the COflV1CIOfl wa.s , sound. So ")i D 3opoQuently djSIiU.:SEd in .too as thèr isnOthinzhich can dane -. tha 3ent:ece, it bciuig the required by ia-i. - -' A:; !Théa A. BLR1ITI, 2th Aptenbero 1934 3tTDG.J. J-udent onounced in LCi n 7th SOeLibr, 1934. I-jr. Jc1uniru for For Ic)peliant - 24 .L4 - CODY o:L '? r.. Ca3T i