19851122 TZCA Dar es Salaam
!', ..... _..-e, . { .. ; ·.·/ ,_..,"__. JlET]'E'TI'N Ki,TIGUL.A a/o MOILJ\fE'D. • • • • VI!'I·iSUS ",, THE' REPU:nt IC• • • • • • • • • .• i • ·1 (llppea! from the crmviction of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) ;(Munyer a, J,) dated the 6th day of December~ 1984 in E£.i~.E.~~ .s~.s,s..~op!3._A9!3~.J!o•• J.£,5...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19851122 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 1985
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
!', ..... _..-e, . { .. ; ·.·/ ,_..,"__. JlET]'E'TI'N Ki,TIGUL.A a/o MOILJ\fE'D. • • • • VI!'I·iSUS ",, THE' REPU:nt IC• • • • • • • • • .• i • ·1 (llppea! from the crmviction of the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza) ;(Munyer a, J,) dated the 6th day of December~ 1984 in E£.i~.E.~~ .s~.s,s..~op!3._A9!3~.J!o•• J.£,5 of_,12§.,! :I i " . The appellant was convicted of murder solely .on the dying !!I ". declarfition of the dacca~ed. -The dec~ased was shot by an arrow at .night, at a time when, according t9 P~W.l, the~o was np I moonlight at all and it was dark. The_ deceased told P. H.l,. who I met her as she was rumri.?)G .:titer she was shot with an arrow, that it was th~ appellant who had-sho~ her be cause the de cc ased had repelled the appellant I s amorous ~dvanceso The decec1scd was . I , going towards the appellant's house to die there. P-W•4, the young son o:t the deceased, stated that he, on that w.;;ht had seen a man behind thdr hou$e, :. and he :tan and rapo+ted that I to the deceased. The-deceas~,d came otit and followed tho man, and • lj IJ the man, whom P.v1.4 could not rccO[;mse ?r identify shot an arrow ! at deceased. The -deceasac1 criGd out li'Katigula ( the name of the !, appall ant) has shot me:: with c1n ar:c ow"f P.w.1 had testified thut the app~llant was drinking for a I _lo~ time that day, and by 7. 0C. p.m. the, appall ant ~was VG~Y drunk and was staggering- and P.].l took thq appallant to his house to sleap off his torpor•· .L-¼t ubout 8. 00 p.m~ that night hG met the deceased injured. When P.:1.1 h.;ard what. the deceased told him, l•W.l and sane vill~ers ,-.rent to the appellant's house and rei:ia~ne;d rut,sidc~· llt about 9• 00 p.m. the yefpella,:• nt amergtd fr om his house, ~ " 1 •••••. /2. Ii,. ,, :1 I, 2 - ~ i,.\.•1'7~ .., . _. siill ~qnk:, "(t~. filld. out uhat thfr noi:1-: jl\ · l.tsi-tii.& ::.:.s :1""84 ~ . . I , When told that -the de cec1sed had ~l.€::; "c.fthat he hc..d shot an arr ow at her and killed her he denied itft Even then the ~ppellant was staggering because he w;;is stil] dru,nk..,, l Ii . 11 ; f, ~ Q1Jlvf cted the &ppellant of On that evidence the trial jµdgc murdering the deceased~?:tit is qu.itc cl~aril that the Qircumctc';lnccs for identificat::.on /;. ',ery un:t'avo,i+,iQb:i:ti ~nd it P .. w.1 was believed, the deceased st"'ted that she Wc';la sho-'.: v:"1ile she we"~ ;11e.jtotill8 the attacker's advances. P.;"i.4's :iv.tqen(;e Jould ,, conflict with the d;ying declaration made by the decec1scd t,o :P.w.,1 1 V l I ,.1 ·I From P.W,l's evidGnce-it w&s clear ,I1thctt 1 . ,. the appellant, vat the material time, t·:as most pr ob..;ibly in n dl'Ul'lllen sle~p at his own house. , ' 1\ .: ' . fr ll It is likely that the ch~ceqSQt fG<lltly, but mistcikenly bel:i-GvGd 1 . 'b\,\t''I 1Jh~ dyirig declaration, in that her attacker was the appGll fl~ 1 the circumst.~nc~s .. of this Cc;lse., must be 'VGl'Y strongly &nd sub- '11 ,. o ~ ~ l f oerrobo::r~totl it oculd b<f .ijoted on. There was no . bof 0:1;0 c&J"Ol?'l'OUO:~ti011 at Qll,. The conv:i.Qtio:Q. Ja~ot pos:1ibly be suppo:rtcd.- ; 11 \: -Ml'• Swcli for the ?iepublic eventual~; agrud th~t the conviction I . oannot stand·• ! I : I We allow the appeal, quash tl\a conv~ oti!on of murder and set 1 • '11 " as1de the.sentence impos~d, Qnd ~d~:r thaJ the appellant be released forthwi. th,. unless he is othu•wisQ J.Qwi'ully detainech I~ . ,, i' D.ATKD at MW.iNZil this 22nd dfiY' o;f Novemoe:r, 1985e •! L. n• M;iKAME' ( ,, t( :i:.J .·~•'\11 ij . ,, I . ,~, ~ I: Iie .il .V ,' h * f, ,Q ; •'. .· 1, .,ea "' ~ . ... I 3. t t · 11 .-'.'~- ,. P r ;··.. . -. ' I ·11 . I!~ / 0 ('.,· ,·r'• ....'·_-~;; ,, ,:,, ' .., ✓~ , • " '\. f I cert_,iiy,,tha,l ,,:th~s fs_~\true copy ~f the original. ~ r 1::-- 1;c,7,1 .. _:.: , ,:., , \\ I r/ : :'. XftJ/fit.>::\ \A3\lII / ., :. I ~ ,,? I~, i t-r:-1v~("''.•'.., ' -:1 ; ~7 : fl . \.,) \ r.i.:>J .__., ;:<// /) . "'- f 1/. / · !I 1- \•cl•\'.. <:_.,,~·-.. . '_·:~_',i /_l~'~/(i./ :. '.:f '..,_ ·. (;i. ~.---tt 1.~AYO):, ._j. ,i . .-·. •.'; 11); v· ,.·,-,,· ·,·,.,· ,'··. fr!< ' DE'PUT .. I/ 0'J:Jr ,, I ST:i ;1fl ,, ~ I ff . fl - _, _ _ -.. ---- ,--»·1-··-•' i: COUJT OI:1 .i\PFIT:"11 OF<liT,:iNZ,:iNIA.• ;r. :t ·i, ~ i~, u ~ :: t' ' ; ~ ·'. b , . ~ •i i :•I :, p l! t) ') ~ "t . ~ : I, l• ,n . I. i :,1 lH (I /\ t, i! ·'' .\i ' . ; t, i1 ( fl,, '. i .f 1.C 11 •.. : fi (, I .~ ! ---1-