19860626 TZCA Dar es Salaam
iL-..------=-- ·---. i ot'. IN THE COUR'.L' OF APPEAL OF 'i'i,NZANIA A'l: MWANZA ~ L I , C.J.; MUS•rAFA, J,r1. -And KISANGA, J.A. ~: ( CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 73 OF 1985 • • • APPELLANT FRANCIS s/o ALFRED. VERSUS THE REPUBLIC .• • • • 0 (Appea1 from_~he convic .. ion of .. he High CourL of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Ka._i .....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19860626 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 1986
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
iL-..------=-- ·---. i ot'. IN THE COUR'.L' OF APPEAL OF 'i'i,NZANIA A'l: MWANZA ~ L I , C.J.; MUS•rAFA, J,r1. -And KISANGA, J.A. ~: ( CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 73 OF 1985 • • • APPELLANT FRANCIS s/o ALFRED. VERSUS THE REPUBLIC .• • • • 0 (Appea1 from_~he convic .. ion of .. he High CourL of Tanzania at Mwanza) (Ka._i .. i, J.) da .. ~1. Lhe 30Lh day of July, 1985 in Criminal Sessions Case No. 33 of 1984 ----------- JUi)GEMENT OF ·.l,'HE COURT , I i I, NYALALI, C.J.: The events which gave rise .. o Lhis case began wii-!1 people· I ' I I Ii happily buying and drinking a local liquor knowp :as_rubisi in a I I , ,I I ),i 'I!, II I col,lnLrY home in Lugasha village, in Karagwe_D~si:.ricL a;id. eoded_ I I with Lragedy in which one person died, ~nd Lhe ··Appe11ar.1:, i:ogeLher . ... · I : ir, 1; ,: ...• wiLh one ~illiam s/o ChayQnka was arresLed and Gharged io Lhe Higb CourL aL B1,}koba for Lhe offence of murder-co~ .. rary to. seci-ion .. 196 of_ .. he Penal Coqe. The Appellan~ ~a~·, convic.1..ed and senLenced LO ~~ffer deai-h by hanging. The.o~her person chafged was ac;;qui,...ed. Toe Appe11an1;. gn his parL 11as_aggr_ievei;l by Lhe conyicLion and senLence, hence .. his appeal Lo·i-his Court-. His_ convicLion is based . .:5-~~e_ly on his re .. rac .. ed confession. From Lhe procee;!ings in ~his Cour+- and Lhe High CourJ:_+-~e following primary fac._s_are eiLher common ground.or ucdisp~i-ed Early aL nigh+- on Lhe 6t.h bei-ween _Lhe pari-ies LO Lhis case. • cl 2 Augus .. , 1985, '-he Appellan'- '-Oge'-her wi+-h P.W.6.(Francis 'Rubula_ngeyo) 1 . William s/o Chayonka and Rurego.Simeon were in 4-he house ot" P.W.1 · (Lusia Alfred) and P.W.2 (Felis+-a Alfred) in Lugasha Village •. There was some rubisi for sale. 'J.:he Appellant. is a bro+:her. of P.W.1 and a son of P.w.2. \ . ::, ... · Th~ said Rurego.Simeon l~ft. '-he place af'-er drinking· +-he l:fquor ···.:. · .. , for sgme'-ime. He wen1;: away wi+-h sgme money which resul+-ed ·in· bi.$.· depar+-ure being repor!-Rd by P.w.1 '-O P.W •• 2 qnd even'-ually to.+-he. App~llan'- by P.'.~. 2. Ac'-ing on 4-his repor+-,. 4-he appell,an .. wen4- out of. '-he house in search of Rurega Simeon, af+-er which +-!Je Appella_nt,_. re+-urned. +-he deadbody of '-he said Rurego Simeon w~s discove_red -by P.W.1 3 (Raphael Nyamb1,11a} oear P.W.3 's house io +-he same village. I+- is common ground +-ha4- '-he deceased.had.a s+-ab wound in __ +-he abdomen. The giscove~y was report.ed '-o +-he 4-en cell leader (P~W.7) and '"...' even+-ually +-o +-he village Chairman. The following morning; •!ny people.gat.hered a+- ~he ho~e of +-he vil,lage Chairman io connec'-iQn.wi+-h 1;:he affair and ques4-ions began +-o be asked abou'- 1;:he iden'-i+-y of +-h~ person or persons responsible for killing '-he deceased~ Ini+-ially P.W.6 and one Richard Rubelengeyo, ~hQ were among +-he people who had beeri·buying and drink:l,ng rub.lsi a+- +-he home of P.W.1 ~nd P.W.? were.su/;?p·ec-1:'ed and arres+-ed by +-he village people's mili+-ia and +-aken +-Q the yillage ~hairma_n's home. The Appellant., who.was one of +-he mili4-ia, +-Ook par+- in apprehending +-hese early suspec+-s. • •••poo••/3 • 1- i ' j I I 3 • _Later P.w. 5 (Marliciali Karanga+-e), ._fie· '!!ard _Secre.+-.~ry came 1--0 +-he village Chairman's hgmc and began ._o make inq~iries. One William <_;:hayonk2s who.was !a,.er join,.ly charged •wi+-h the Appellan+- bu .. _acg~ .. 1--ed, +-Ook the Ward Secre'-ary a~ide and informe<;l him <-ha+- +-he Appellan'- was a prime _suspec+- sinc_e he. app~ren .. ly had ;'!Uspicious bruis~s on his face ang hands •.• Ac-i-,ing -: on +-his tnfo.g.ia .. ion and observa'-ion, P.W!S arre~+-ed and +ie~i_ ~h~ ~ ·.. · Appellant wi+-h ropes and proceeded .. Q in'--erroga+-e.him. : A~·- fii:'s+- >fw .' · Appel;i_an+- denied any inyolvement in +-he dea+-h Qf +-p_e'~dec~ased l_;_i~+-- ... \ . . . . 0: be la+-er conf~ssed 1--0 s'"abbing the deceased wi+-h.a )\;nife assisted by - '£. +-he said W.Uli<lm <_;:hayonka who s<-~uck deceased wi+-h ,(· stick. I+- 'lo..... . is undispu .. ed <-ha+- a knife and s'-ick were discovered ~. .• a+ : +-he scene ~ .. of crime. _Even+-ually the Police were informed, +-hey a sketch.plan of +-he scene of crime. _A M~ical fssistant also came 1--0 the scene and conduc+-ed q pQstmor+.em ·examination of +-he body or +-he deceased. He· found +-ha+- +-he body had·a s+-ab· wo~nd 'Ill . '. 4 in +-he abdomen and had t,rutses all gver._ In hi:;\opinio~, "~he . ··,. c;}eceased dieg of wound +-ha'- pene+-ra'--ed +-he sple·e.i and. perfora+-ed .., . ·, ._,_ ...... . ···. From +-he sal!)e pq,ceedi9gs, +-h~ prill)ary an1 -~econdary f2c+-_s +-h +- are in dispu+-e be+-ween.+-he par+-ies.+-o +-bis· case 2 . . ~pQear 1--0 be ... . - ·. ~ . . ~·· '!?i+-bil) a narrow compa;'is.of +-he case. I+- is +-he prosecu+-i:or:i ·,:-,ise. +-ha+- +-he decP.ased lefi. +-he home of P.w.1 and_P.W.:? ei+-her.wi+-hou+- paying for +-he liquor he had purchased or af~er s+-ealing the money which was_+-he proceeds of.+-he sale of.+-he liquQr. The prosecution con+-ends +-ha+- when +-he Appe11an+- wen+- ou+- in search • • ••••••• / 4. 'I J 4 of +-J:!e deceas'S'd, he c;:augh'- up wi.i..h_him, aP-acked_him and .. even'-ually fa'-ally s'-abbed him in '-he abdomen wi+-h a knife. The De:f~nce ca§e is_ -1oha'- '-he Appellag+- :failed to find the d~ceased._ I'- is par'- of '-he qefcnce case >-ha'- be confessed_+-o .. ': S'-abbing '-he ~eceased only af'-er being giv~n cl 4-horough beaf-i.ng and in order .i..o save himself from fur+-her '-Or+-ure. ., . There c.re gnly -1owo main :;.ssues of fac+- for_cons:!,,dera-1-ion ··- and decision in +-his case. Th~ first one is whe+-her -1-he Appe112°P-I- r"~. confession w~.s volun'-ary or_no>-. The learn~d_trial Judge, Ka+-i+-1, J. specifically considered '-his issue and s+-a>-ed, "I did above make a figding +-ha+- +-his_amgun+:ed to . / a conf~s§ion _by ~he f:!,,rs+- acc1,1sed, and on +-he_.evidence,. I have found an unqoub'-ed ab§ience of +-ori-ure -~·nd or· · violen+- '-rea .. men'- of +-he firs'- accused, by ei,_1-her P.w.·5 or any m~mbers of 1-he peasan,.ry p.:blic befo.-e whom he -was_ and as such I have no problem in concluding and making a 11 finding +-ha+- +-he same confession, was volun+-arily made • -t-ri 1 Judge,. He submi'-'-ed +-ha•- +-he_s-urraunding a+-mosphe,i:-e ca1Jsed 2 by the pre§ence of many members of_ +-h!;! People's Militia and +-h~. fac+- i-oa+- '-h~_Appellan+- was pers:!,,s'-en~ly in+-erroga,-ed by P.W 1 5 while '-ied_w:i,1-h ropesl amoun+-ed +-o in>-Ql~rable_pr~s§ure~ With due res9ec+- ··O Mr. f?u'-aIJ)balal we do no+- +-hink .. ha+- +-bese c;:ircums'-ances amoun'-ed +-o in'-oleragle pressure upon +-be Appellan-1- +-0 make_a confession. He was_no+-_'-h~ gnly person in +-hose circyms'-ances. I+-_is_undispu>-ed ~ha'-_+-he o+-b~r persoo who was j oin'-ly charqed wi+-h .. he 1ppellan-:- bu1- acgui'-+-ed, tha+ is, Williar.. Chayonka, was also under +-he same circums+-ances bu+- he denied "••o,••••/So • __ ___, . 5 I. confession was volun'-arily made. The second major issue of fac-1,. is whe'-h~r i-he confession is t-rue. The __ L§!arned -1,.rial Judge considered i-his issue and was t-he confession. Firstly, +-he <'.!ppe11 9 n'-_had a_mo'-ive t-o a+-'-_ack .. ,~8e deceased and he admi,.':edly wen,. ogi- '-ha,. nigbt- in search_·of.',.-1:-tie·· dece9sed. Sec;;oncly 1 '-he Appellan'- was seen i-o_have susp':i.c;ious , . .. scratches on :-he face and _hand§ and he f 9 iled i-o explain .. +-.hem.; ·· and '-hirdly, +-h~ Appellani- men+-ion~d_a S'-ick and knife and such '!{eapons were 1?C+-ually discovered a'- '-he sce[le of crime·,._ ·:Bearing_ ... it t-hese c;:irc;:Ul!l:c;'-ances in IJ1ind, we find, like_+-h~ Learned \-rial The Other impoi;-,.an'- is§ue fgr c<;:>nsi:lera'-iQn and dq::•is;j,on in relying 9n '-he ~•~rac'-ed and uncorrobora'-ed confession_in convi <;;'--i-ng· '-·he-Appe11an'-. 0 The Le 2 rned -1,.rial_J1,_1dge coi;-.reci-ly. direc'-ed himself on '-he appropria'-e law as ~'-a'-ed int-he c;ase of TUWAMOI vs. UGANDA ( 1977), E.A. p.89 anc;! he proc;eec;!ec;! to convict- t-he Appellan+- af';er being fully sa'-isfied !-hat- !-he confession canno'- be any,.hing bu'- t-rue. • • • • • u/6 • • ., 6 correcL in so doing. We 1ismiss/,he Appeal in i>s'en,ite>y. DATED a-1; MWANZA : h i s ? f ~ of June, 1986. F. L. NYALALI CHIEF JUSTICE A. MUS•i-AFA '· 'I JUSTICE OF APPEAL R. H. KISANGA JUS·rICE OF APPEAL ,. ' I certify LhaL Lhis is a Lrue copy of Lhe _original·. DEPUTY ~EGISrRAR • •