19870601 TZCA Dar es Salaam
' . ' >. -- , ...·-:·.,,.,... --~--·· ;.:-.., ._·<t • • f __ • ~ • .. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZJuITA ,.,. ~ MBEYA ' (~: ™ I b C.J. 1 M.AKAME 1 J. A. 1 Md;· MFAI:I.L.Ji...s A4• J .A.) . CRIMINAL 'APP~ 1m. 102 OF 19.fr/ BUR!'ON MW!JWASU • • • • • • • • • APPELLANT VERSUS i THE REPUBLIC. • • • • • • • • • •...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19870601 TZCA Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 June 1987
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
' . ' >. -- , ...·-:·.,,.,... --~--·· ;.:-.., ._·<t • • f __ • ~ • .. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZJuITA ,.,. ~ MBEYA ' (~: ™ I b C.J. 1 M.AKAME 1 J. A. 1 Md;· MFAI:I.L.Ji...s A4• J .A.) . CRIMINAL 'APP~ 1m. 102 OF 19.fr/ BUR!'ON MW!JWASU • • • • • • • • • APPELLANT VERSUS i THE REPUBLIC. • • • • • • • • • • RESPONDENT ( Appeal from the ·conviction of the High Court of Tanzania at Mbe3;a. ( lliaina_, !.!J dated the 24th da.Y of June·, 1907 ···---· · in ~ n a l Sessions Case No. 66 _of_ 19~ MFALILA1 ..&.!...l.!.~: The appellant . BURTON' mlli.NSASU Vas charged wit~'l and oonvio1;ed,crft~' .''' of muro.er cu the High Court sittitl[;' ,at Mbeya (Ha.ina., ,i;) and: wj~~~;/; to de~th. \ He locJeed this appeal ~a.inst both his conviction • and • aenteno . ·•/'l..J::1-!)"tP.. · of de'a.th. He was oonvioted solely on his ow11 00111'eoaion whiob,;;118 made .t'' 1 various people on diff'oront oooasions~ . There was no ' . ot~; •nt~~~'.""~·-· •: ..,..,,:<;..... #;,-.~ ... ii The deceased Osiah SWebe met his' violent end cruel 'deatli: l~~:in}':1f the evening on 27/12/82· at about 8.30 p.m. it was dark ~~~~~~Rl' arrived at the. scene in respl'.>nse to an ala.rm, they only ~~~:~__.~~- . .,":}. ' ,.... , ,·· . lying dead with out wounds on the head Clld._ neck. ' .:. .,.. ... -~ The assail.~;w~•.'~owhe,~ · ' -- ,, . ~ to be seen. Among the people who respond.ol ft the alarm ~ ~ e d .a~,- t . . ·• ·~ -, . ·-· ·- scene~ the appello.nt _•·s·oN>t·her Godwell ~~z.su (1>.. 1 w; _!';,~'.,,., · · !Qdia. (P.w.4) and their guest Da..'Uel swili (P.W.l). The . Ji;. •, !8/12/82 the _appellant_ {;l,l'ri~ed at Godweil •a home 'and ~ed:_'.,,,,., · al~n~{i!~ his wife Lydia. o.nd guest Daniel to come -outside as lla had· something· io te;,. them in private. He told them that he wanted their assistance in lo,.....,.__......... ' : j fer a med.ioineman who would oast 'a;.ta.Y apells from him and save him.£'.~~~-(- the evil ·effcds of killing a. mo.:.1 boca.use it s;,a.s he who ltj.lled t~-- deQ.· •' Osiah Swabe.. lie e~lained that he had: deci_ded to-.-lcil'.Cthe' ~eZ'eaiill.~ ""'_~::- • .. I • ,,"°'. he had bewitched him aild after consulting various witchdoctors, he ~ - become apprehensive that he inight b~come epilep·~ic or insane. ~e t ~ _reacted difforently from extreme foa.r in_ the case of the· wom~ ~~ to ., utter cont~mpt and indifference cy the two men. ~ :tls 1:,aa the fi.rst 1 confession by the appellant. The second confession was that which he inade to the_ a.rrestiiw officer Sgt. Amt P.w.5. Olt peing informed tha.t ho was beiJ:8 arrested . ' for thG . murder of 0si·al1"$i~e· s.ppellant adr.lit·ben . the ki.llitl& a.nd , , that he l~ usod a billhook to do that. He also co.ve rea.so.?$ killing ail)l led_ police to his father's house whore he showe4 t billhook he had used. The third confession was made cy the appollaut to Senior Inspector Ifanford Esalu. This was in the form of a cautioned ,. ' statement; t·Thich was produced and admitted in evidence at the trial. In_~_his st.a:t.emant, the appella.nt-11ot only admitted the killing, but describsd hot·1, he had killed the deceased by Weyl~ him as he -ret'\ll'ned home from a session of pombe drinking, In his defence the e,ppolla.,.;t denied that he h<l.Cl admitted to !: ,· a.nyone killing the deceased. \-Tith ro,;1.-:.rd to thG cautionod statement, ' 'he stated that he was tricked bto signi:1(£ it cy bail1g told t.ru:i.t it was a statement showi1;g th"'t· ho had do1:ied the cha.rc;o. However afte.r reviowing ·t;he evidence the learned trial j\ldoe was satisfied that all t.ho 1\ : oo.nfassio11S were made by tho a.ppellont to t:iose different people on the i-~-~?I difforent occasions and tha.t thoy were true. !Io fouild and hold that the ~ ~ (..: "'', ·41-~ ovidenoe of P.H.l and P.H.2 o.s prime suspGcts, re'-i,.-uired oorroborat~on '. .,: . , before it could be ootcd upon, bu:t lie found such. corroboration in the evidence of the woman ~dia (;i,.:·1.4). He rcjedecl t!1e a.ppellant•s denials ,, .. -r of ha.vi~ r:ia.de these confcsriio11a· and convicted him. I l At tb.e hoa.riIJB of this n.,pccl 1 Ur. Nt·T.:kil~a filed and argued two t ,J II main grou.'1.Cls of appeal 011 bel:.a".'__~~- tJ1c appello.nt. First ho said that the Te·a.r11eci-trial judge misdirocted himself by not holding that· Izy-ila. I (P.W.4} t-10.s also a suspect. Tho only reason I-fr. lh•rokilo.sa gave for . labaling I-Ordia thus ,rn.s that she hod been arrested and a.ooordi._.ng :to him by necessary implication dota.ined. 11.j do not c>.:;ree. The bulk of the \ ;\ evidence points to the fact tllD.t almost all tl10 witnesses went to the • , .. • ; • .....® ii I Police st.:d.ion 1,aot under arrest bu:t follow'ini;· ino'bru:ctions from Poli'ce ' ~, . .,....:..J;,:A•--"-""":. . ,,_\ ... ,,,-,..;,- f•.- ~\':..,;,,_,~~__.- .• -, -r----c----~---:- . . ,. . _ _____;_~~---;__--, -~•"f 7 ~~-----,----'---~---'--"-•r~·=---- ...._-'--'"'-"-~"-'---'~~-~~·-c•--z:._:;:_,:s: ;:__~_-::·-:_~~=~'_,;_'--::/. :·:..~.. } . ::. -- -· ,)v ·1 ·- 3 lcyeia that everyone should report· at the Police- station; It would a.pp~ .;~ this was a goneral. request or order. On arrival at tho Police Sta.tiollt · · · (' she was not detained, she ~turned home tho same ·c1ey; · ·Tha?'!'J .was thus ~ · ·•: reae~:o-tronor as a B~eoi", in- n~ed of absolx_itlg. her~elf~ 'AJ.tl).01JSh.::'.;::t' the trial. j\ldge ·treated Godwoll and Swila as suspoo~~, a.n<; ihus· raquti-ei;))':. _ . . . . . . '. .,. ,. . : thai:i- evidel'lOO to be corroborated, we think these two would appear.'to h,.:Ne ·. bean involved ,velq as part or' a ge~ral pohoo op(!l'a:tio~ ·- · _;:;} '! 'l".ie second e-·round argued qy Mr. Mwakilasa is that 'the ·-· :·..,-. ' judge miad.iraoted himself qy believing the uncorroborated evidenoe o~ Daniel (P.H.1) Godl-1011 (P.W.2) and Lydia P.W.4. He olabora.ted this 'tV . _,·: · • . ~ ,. .· t pointing ,out that thcso witnesses gave contradictor.y ' accounts of ,~~ 'what .. ;I,..,, • the appellant told them i11 oorinootion with tho kill!'~ of the' d~a.H1£i-} ' . . :.''' 1'·· lie so.id that whilo the woman Lydia. said .tho o.ppollont dosori bod t~ weapon • . . ,..,,. . ha had used to kill the deooa.aod, tho othor wi tl'l.ossos did not d added. 'J ·. that in a:ny oa,se there wero gI"l.l.dBos between tl!o C'..ppollant O,llµ. tho. ~!_ness 'l'heso points ,are truo, but wo do not th~nk they a.ffocted the main aubst of tho case, With regard to the woapon, Iqdia wa,a positive about~ t"~--:, appollant mentioning tho weapon ~10 used, Godwell said' tho appellam . did ., ....... ~F mentio_n ariy woapon, and Da.riel,fhld nothi?l.3 at all about it •. These two--:__;,,, witnesses theTef-ore mey not ecnuinoly have hoard th~ appellant me~tion~thf · weapon. In an::, oas<a they woro all agreed 011 t!1.o no.in point that the a.p • •. r .· )'\ told them of his ha'Vina, kiHod the doooa.sed 1 the_ roll,Sona thereof, ·aru1 wlzy'. · he was telling thorn this. As ro~~s tho ::i.llacod c3rudgos between the . I ,: . . appellant Md those witnesses, first~ this did not cover all the, wit~aeS: a.a the alleged rofusal to work ·only ruforrod t·o Gochioli1 s ·ahamba,,,:,_no.irl:ef·'_. , . •. _..V . ' . •~I •·•,\.-1'-',~-;, being a comi.)lcto stro..."l[;er. Soco~ wo ~do ,;i.ot t~:~ .;thl,s ;icind. · of \g~ . . . '· ' . . .· ';l, ...... would bo enough motiv:ition fer thcso wit~1osces to s~lo. thoir rolri.'f;iv~-, • \. '• t:·,~•~-4;·:· with a murder -charao. L: thooo oircumstu-.1ooa -~!1.0 lee.mod trial jwgei;: • ·\, V: -· ., oorrootly troatod Lydio.fs cvid.onoo r.o 09rroboro.tivo of tho ovidanoe·,of: _ ', ? • ... .. ••• ' ~. i - .r, . . '. -...~. ,. Daniel (P.W.1) o.nd tha.t'of hor husbo;td Go.iWllll who were initi_olly ·. ',,;.· troat~d as prin{o suapocts by roo.sol" . of their hii,vi~ · ~en dri~i - . ·,.:<:'< ·. \, ).._. together witl+ tho dococwod shortly before his doc.th,.. In any case the..... ·· appellant 1 s confessions to those t,·itnossos arc nlso col'Jfinnod by what _, ~.. . - .- . . ........... - he stated ·111 his cautioned statement o.;.1d his s·b.-.tcmorrli_ rogaJld:l.l:JB'. how and with what woapon ho attc!clcod tho d.oooa.sed ;l,.s, oon:f'irmed. l:zy' the doctor in his post-mortem report• • .. .. . ' :;-~~-,,=.~ \ '.· ,: . .~u.i·· >40•;, .... 4 \ I j(/' .. .-!:,- "'!..,, .... . .• and it is dismissed. .. _.·.. .... ~;~~ :~:?· ·;,\ J t \,, '• 1-'f :,. N\', •• "!'"\:- i (1 ~~-· .:, .,;;-.:.~ .·.... ·-:~t ·. ;~~~ .... • . ' .. !_ -, ' . . .,.'<i~ .~· ~,.t . F. L. !lY.t.L.ALI • • CJ:~ . {.,. ~ '• .I ..,,.,.,: ➔• ·~- -£.HIEF JUSTICE , -:- ~:t •. ~~. -:-:~. \, ... • .. • ""•-'i14rr:.-_ .,;,,_ 1,.,.. 1,. .,. ' \·:;.:·\\ ~ ~ ♦.:--~ ., ;/ ~ 1-t-, rr~r .,,_, --~'} . . ~, ,:.. ' ·~ ,;~ . I ... :· . •it:~ .. , LI • ...id. lUJUIME ;_ . . •' ,t., : .. ..._., ......t:~·.i·~ JUSTIC~ OF APPEAL ' it - - - - - - -..... -■-•-... '.!: ' ~-,4 . - ':', ... ~--~---. •·•·,-•·J~:} ..( ., ... \ .:· '#'Vfl- ,·• - .· \. -~-..t- . . •· ·.;.- :-." fi. .... . ~ 1r' L. l'I. MFALILA • :- - "'>·,_. . _. .\_ -· ,,_ ' t JlG • JUST± CE OF ilPPll:,~• ~ ":'.!:' . --I-oe-Ptify tha.t this· iif ·a7:.~ ·copy of tho or:i,ginaJ...-. ___ .. I . •'.i,-,J•.: ,. . .:·r,,. 1/ •1 . . ._:_'·.:,. ~~ \ ...... ' "-~ r:-'(~h;;., . ( .:..~. \ ·. ~t'~)· ~ ' '\·\f \; '-~:j' \ q\ \, ~ . . "::_-t~- • ~~ I ••- • .. \ ••J q -: . •i"';, ;'i" f' ~ ".,-; .! •.,.,:! ' " -~t<;:l(. \, ( .J~ H. MSOW.J: ) , ' ,/ ( ... ,. :\ ~l~,,9~' "~"i.'"'... "J.~ ' §_ENIOi-Y DBPUTY lllGISTil.A~ . \ • -~ .-~. ' . '(J :,,\i,'1 l •r:f/f;., ~/ ,Ji. - ' .... "" , , '~~,I•• "'-.l/7f~~ ~/~- ' ... ,. 'II,'•) .. '• ·' );),' ~?4¼.;~, ... ,. ·:.\)'t. \ ~;' ' ... ',:1· t, h,,J·, ····.{'·•; :\ \rf \ '• -~..~~.-: .....w, . ,;< .-: \,;·,~-:·r._ :_._~·,- .:..,,.,' . . . .,., . I . 1., "'"" - '.f' ;~ , ~ ., --... ·.--· ---·;-1., . ~ ~\. .. ·:.. i\. , .. .._t . ,\ ... ,.,.. ,. ; ~.J",,.·, .- • ' ,-:: t· . _) -~·-·. ,~:. ·----- - · - - · .... .., --- ·-'-..:(;( -- ;, \ \)'., .· ~-'.' .- . .. -. . '.t" '\\,,1/,;,,• t,,•,.,~.~ ·•·,~.: - , ' .->,.,, __ ,, •• ·.- ~1t~~~ _ ; ~ -· ~ )\v.\. . ·. . .-- ). ,. ' ••"' •• II••: ~ ...:,.,• : ";: .,. '. I,, ~-~ ~ 1' , • " , :, ~·-.J,"t4/.!. .... • ~1:'( -,-,'"~\2."'· t YI',{. ~ • • ••l~~ r:;;~_•,.:-.,;, ..;:: ,~• " ... ,-"',,,_.;L ..,,.,.,. •••ft.,/, • ~t. ',<"· ~-- .:.·__;_~-:G~• · : .. ·.. :.,; ·· i · •· • ·-:-;• .-.;:f ~----~- .: ..1: - ..:Jr•. ~!~-~~~