19870918 TZHC Arusha3
III T:' COJLT OF LPPEL OF TPJI!ÜTIL. AT LYJi- C;ULI1TLL p:;J.L 110. 21 03' 1937 ji11f ±21-J7 I V u- THf :TTJTL,IC ....................•PO 1 E) 1TT (A:: cal fro the conjiction. o? the Court of Tansania at i-rus:a) - xtencied Jurisdiction) atec. the 10th day of ilovenber, 136 in C-'j.:jna1 3esionC Case lTo. CL of •...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19870918 TZHC Arusha3
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 1987
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
III T:' COJLT OF LPPEL OF TPJI!ÜTIL. AT LYJi- C;ULI1TLL p:;J.L 110. 21 03' 1937 ji11f ±21-J7 I V u- THf :TTJTL,IC ....................•PO 1 E) 1TT (A:: cal fro the conjiction. o? the Court of Tansania at i-rus:a) - xtencied Jurisdiction) atec. the 10th day of ilovenber, 136 in C-'j.:jna1 3esionC Case lTo. CL of • J. was chan;e with and conjictecl of the iourder The au')ellant of one heheria cl/o Iddi and was sentenced to deatb- He Is aDea1Li to this Court fron tnt conviCti0 - ieaded r:nheneSS to In his c3fe 1ce the an:-e1iat had was incaDaOle o :o-f tne 5nGC1Z1C t:ae e;:tent that ne the intent to hil1 also :7leac.ed tnat ne naa assaultect 1" deceased uri:ier uroiocati0n. Teiant relied. :.ainly on the defence Lt the trial the a iOSuO. nod?eve: also rellect on tne -.rovocaJOr! o c.runneness . re n ns suoriZSiOflS after tne ra1, 1..r. uouJu, wno aupeared Court, concentratea on the for the a?e11ant at the ::ih the assessors drunl:eneSS defence, and addressed the court ar-d rlea. on not refer to tne :rov0c ion astrae (etenac jurisaiction a ) The Princ:ual esient i assessors, but she did not direct theni sur:neci u to the had On the isSue of r rovocatiOn, urobally because 1r. Lobulu not done SOe eaTen xor ne aspellant. eiore us, P.r. Looulu a.:i a court to diroct He subuitted that the failure of the trial the assessors on the issuG of o-ocatcn was fat al and -2- he tad failed to vitiate the roceediI:S. he adr::ittCC iS3iO o te trial court aeal yitii thaG issue iti ot cetraCt rO: te fact tie a oscars, hut iotid 2 Ct the circ3aflCeC that the -?roceoci ~ 'iere viated Cj. Liyeal ITo. 17 of he refe'recl to the case of (uti:o:ed which had 1905 of 26.06 (Court of Lp?eai) a :on cti0i hy a trial jude to the deciCec- rovocati0 re:ere. the trial a :.ullitY. assessors oi jziO. The trial court 1e acee ;rith Mr. Lou1.Y 3 3 the issue of sroVocation, had failed to irect the assessors o: which was aart of the defetice. the circr:3tances the arid the trial was a sillity* rrocei 5 .rere vitiated cor!vCtiO-- asd set aside vi e aiio;r the asieal, quas the trial a :llitY. the seste:sCe i:iosed aisd declare the orderS rreierrid' to lea7e the Ic :ahe :o further the a c?rate authorities to jeatter i:s the hasicls of a.e-I r_t,a. - is th day of Certemher 9 19 0 7. :JhlhJ at L. • TJ JTJTIC OF .2hLLL :Cr - -, I.) • • iv_. J.._.'_--' I certify that this is a true coey of the original. 1);DTurZ :dDGI3.'hJJ.