19880530 TZCA Dar es Salaam6
,. . A']) HBErA _.:-~; MAUME,·;i_,a,._s;~~-·-it,A·•'_~a,:wt• J1AJ • CRl~AL. AnEAI,_NO. 54 OF !987. VERSUS ·THE REPUBLIC •••• , •••••••••••••••. - (Appeal from t h e - ~ ~ o.t'>t;be ·. High Court of Tanza~ia a~ Il:iliga) - (Mtenga~ J.) dated tile 1st-day oto April, '1987 in· JUDGMENT QF TH.E OOURT- • ,,. - MAKAME. J...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19880530 TZCA Dar es Salaam6
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1988
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
,. . A']) HBErA _.:-~; MAUME,·;i_,a,._s;~~-·-it,A·•'_~a,:wt• J1AJ • CRl~AL. AnEAI,_NO. 54 OF !987. VERSUS ·THE REPUBLIC •••• , •••••••••••••••. - (Appeal from t h e - ~ ~ o.t'>t;be ·. High Court of Tanza~ia a~ Il:iliga) - (Mtenga~ J.) dated tile 1st-day oto April, '1987 in· JUDGMENT QF TH.E OOURT- • ,,. - MAKAME. J ~A 1 : -. · Thia is ap appeal by RICHARll MSOOOYA 1'hor w.a oo:wimne.d. ~ . death b;., thE: High Courl sitting at ll:inga,. ( ~ , J.)., The . / appel.lant, was found to have l!Ul:de,:e,ii his matai::nal. \m~e by baoking him w~th a panga. He ini'lioted upon the-4~o.eas~d a number o£ severe inju.rie&~ incl~ding a i'raoture of the skul-'1:-. The cause of · death was shoclc:: resulting from the multiple injuries •. Be!ore ·us the appellant was rep~aet)~Q. by Mr. l:wakilaaa,. -·-••' ·'"Iearned.~sel. Advocating for· the responde:Q.t :Rap:..iblic was ?1t'. Kapirlga, lea.med State Attorney• ...• Mr. Mwakilasa conceded that the k~l1.ng was. done by the alppeliant and.i'm~oaci 'aay.-li&ht-. He valiantit wont on to- suggest ttlat the appellant ought -to have been committed to a ~ntal institution so as to· dete.rmine the state of his mental health ·at the ~terial time,.. Ml:-. Mwakilasa•s two reasons tor the B\l6gestiQ11 were tbat'ithere was no· appaf'Ei'nt reason for the killiilg r- and secondly that,· ·af~er the killing, tbe _appellant did uot 111:y t°' escap·e from the village.,. . ~- ·: · .. ·"-{">f~, ,, .. .,. ,. . M:.. 1'sp:!.nga submj.tted ~t.. tin.a waa a clear· case 0£ nurcln .,,t.?~: ' ~ -- . '. ·>:· ....~ in 'Wb.ich the dei'enoe. of Insanity was: ne-itb_ei-•rai.sed n~ av"$U&~f:·; J'.,;~ • , ' ~. l 7 • ' ..L••,1:1J•~~•·., .• ".l,'lle~ was nothil:ig :l.n tb.e .a~Uazit•• be~1o¥ and oondu.ct _t~t ).,...•;_"'.:"".... "4 would suggest that he was. other_ than sane. We think that Mr .. Mwakilasa. properly made the_ COJ?,~~40ll ' _: ~ ~ ~ . ·, ..... ·• he made: the appellant's assertion at the t~ial that h~- pid not . . _attack the deoeased end did n,o,t.. even see him on the materia;t ·day was quite absurd .. U: t~ _£~~~ 0£, the evide_no~. · ·- g:iven-agains~.:.h~ · · }~~l< - ·-~ ·:- . .~. : :·. ·r.•il Between them, the testimony•Gf the three women: .l"',1'!~1 DAV!DIKA ><~~t MALENGA, P.W •.3 CECILIA SEKAND~, and_ ~•W,4 SCOPIOZA -~T~,---~-- . __::_·(~~-- establtahed beyond doubt that t.lle .appellant overtook them on the .:. · · . . ' . • • -·~ _....~ •. : .... ·°"'j., . ,,. -,.'. :..i-,,..,,. way, caught up wi tll the. decease~ whom he felled I t~ th.e g.round_,, .end),':f:, : ·:,:.,.. t ,.\l.f prooeede4 to cut hinl, ,Th~re was also evidence· 'tha"t the appellant.· -,.·:,-:, . '> ' ... ~-. ~1.;.,-•. led the Police to his house wher~ he gave them a panga _and a-~~.t)M both of which proved to oe soiled with human blood. I \ , • _: )\-:):(,_ . .\ ~- ,;~r-··. No motive for the killir)6 was brought out in- the evidence but · /~-: . . . . ".! l. .,..t.-... of course none ·had to be established in order to ground a cQnvict-ion _,...:; · .. . . / .. . \:~:;.;.~ for murder. The apparent. ~ck· of motive cannot- be the sole _basis :-- ·'\-..,._.,,z. \ . for suggesting that a person charged with mu.rder r.r.ist or o~ht · have been insane. In the present case the offence _ch.:rr~ed was ,,. - . .. . . ---~:~'.:,.,_, :-:f, , _ . i:~"-· :~ye_d ~ reasonable doiibl;. The appellant re~?-Jiing u,1~-;•··t·''.,. ~- ' I •. .:. . ) the vill~g~_ after the killing would, not necesS"-lrily ::uggest _; .. . • • , ! . .', ·-~ .. ~ -~:rt 1\; that he was· insane. We are aware that, especially in spme ·;~>J··' parts of the country, there is sometirres almost a sense 0£ -~~;;~do after a person. has killed -another, and ~t..·:.i§_::not,·',:: . • ;:i tr:~~;•. . i!,,;.,_1.1, , .~he th~ to do to run.away. The app~a.l_has. n·o meri.t·;~d :; ;-·:·. '.?<{1:°- . : .;.~ ,, we accordingly dismiss it. ......• ../.; . -~-' . . . ;_f ... .. ~ , I .;.:- _1 ' \ . - - ~ •· ., . .... .... , ,.. .. : -_, ... .. ' ' I L. M. MAKAME Jt5TICE OF APPEAL R.H. KIS.Al{;A JUSTICE OF APPEAL A M.A. OMAR 0 iJ!STICE OF APP!w. I ,tertit:, tbet tt:ua !a a true eopy 0£ the or4;~l •. -~/ (J. H. 1:fSOFFE) . ( SENIOR DEPUTY RmIS'.('!:.ill·. \ \ --' / ' I ... • .... ,.! ... . I . ' ; I