19881006 TZHC Tabora
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA ---- AT TABORA •. I ·....... MISC. CIVIL ·APPEAL NO. 1 OF 1987 S EFU NTOGWASHINGJ • ·• • • • • • • • • . APPELLANT. VERSUS MISINZO NZEKE ••• p • • • •·• • • • • • • RGSPONDENT KOROSSO, J. • •• 0 This is an appeal presented by'the ApJellant raiien~~ng t~e decision of the lower...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881006 TZHC Tabora
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 October 1988
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA ---- AT TABORA •. I ·....... MISC. CIVIL ·APPEAL NO. 1 OF 1987 S EFU NTOGWASHINGJ • ·• • • • • • • • • . APPELLANT. VERSUS MISINZO NZEKE ••• p • • • •·• • • • • • • RGSPONDENT KOROSSO, J. • •• 0 This is an appeal presented by'the ApJellant raiien~~ng t~e decision of the lower fourts. ,,., The 'Appellant had been suocestully 5 headij of 111•tle an_~- the sum of Shs. 500/ = as damages for the A1l'ellant's alleged adultery with.·.. the Responden1't , . ._ ~--------------. - ~-. ' wife, The. Appellant unsuc cessfull,y· ·a!)!)eaJ.e.d. t-0 t11e - ,,,. D~strict Court, . !fence this appeal to this Court, Aceording to the evidence adduced by the Respoaden; 01e Misuzo Nzeke (P.w.1 ), on 2.5/3/86 he had rete:i,ved a Le;"te'.P whiell threatened him to leave the .village together,· ·. '· ,~ th his wife because he ( Pw 1 ) had been responsible f1tt the deaths of pel'.ple in the village. The Responden\' s wife aecidentally picked up the letter on 26/3/198C and then caused the same to be read over to her .by a youth, The Respondent decided to go and report the ·- ..... mstter ·to the local authority. The Respondent was ,~ followed by his wife who joined her at the homa of· :te Samuel Kaswahili (~.~). While Pw.1 and his wife we1e t:1t the home of Pw.• 2, the Appellant happened to In the afterno-on of 26/3/86,the 1tesponden-;'s wi!e was-discovered absent shortl:S,....after the depar~ure . -. ot ~he Ap~ellant. The Appellant consequently oecame 'ihe •entre of suspicion. .1 f I ~ . . . i On the ~videncc ~ there was· cause for ·suspicion, '· B~t th~n some more evidence was required to eonfirm I I . .., ',.,. ... .. .,, t· ., :··· .- ..... _ - 2 - sueh suspicion, It should be remembered that the Ree'l'ondent's wife had dtsappeared on 26/3/1986 just a few hours after r • .. •.'. .. i .• .. . ·- ~- she had it read to her the contents of the letter which had fairly expressed warned her and her husband, the Respondent, to quit their village• ~he ·reats conveyed by the letter could have throughou~ been unbearably operating in her delioate mind, ~he ...real eould have been the possible eause ot he» m~sterious disappearance. On the foregone grounds, I would re'lf'Grse the detlsion of the lower Courts .• Appeal allowed with costs. A. G. G .KOROSSO, 6/10/1988 I,r,ity that this is the PY of tbe original ..... J emen'i• ~,J)ISTRIC ]GISTRAR ,TA,~ .· ...\ "\: . I- l { I "" ' ··1 < \ I I' ·. • .. -·I . I ,.[ ,.,.~ • -,..•t ... ' a• .- '