19881104 TZHC Dar es Salaam
( IN TIIE IIIGII Cotm.ri' OF TAl'TZANIA AT DAR ES SA!Jill..l'-1" COUTIT WillTIAL cnrrHNAL APPJAL no~ 1 OF 1987 MT .. 13040 L/CPL IT'Ii'.NGICIIERI MIJl1TA ., •••••••••••••••••••., •• APPELL,\NT versus JUIJGE ADVOCf.TE GENEPJI.L •••••••••••• ~ , , .............. , •••• RESP01IDEN111 ( Origo - Pros) JUDGEMENT OF Tim...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19881104 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 November 1988
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
( IN TIIE IIIGII Cotm.ri' OF TAl'TZANIA AT DAR ES SA!Jill..l'-1" COUTIT WillTIAL cnrrHNAL APPJAL no~ 1 OF 1987 MT .. 13040 L/CPL IT'Ii'.NGICIIERI MIJl1TA ., •••••••••••••••••••., •• APPELL,\NT versus JUIJGE ADVOCf.TE GENEPJI.L •••••••••••• ~ , , .............. , •••• RESP01IDEN111 ( Origo - Pros) JUDGEMENT OF Tim COURT NAINJl. 9 J. Tb.a a.ppello.nt? MT 13040 Lo.nee Corpornl Nn11(sichori Marwa, wns convicted by tho Gonornl Court Mnrti0.-l of tho Tnnzanio. People ts Defence Forces of nu.rcler 1 nncl he wns sentoncccl to death by ho.neing. Tlw appon.1 is 8..{sainst tho conviction and sentence. At tho tine of the n.lleeed J.,-,.illii1G 9 both tho nppollrmt n.nd tho doceo.secl, Priv2,te Po.trick llugustinoy wore sto.,tionoc1 nt a, nilitnxy cc;.Jp nt Entcbbe Sta;~e LoclGc in Ugnncln. On thnt day, 2G fJ..l[;Ust, 1901? G.t about 3.,45 p.1:1.,, nJ1 Scre;ca.nt Jun.:i.. Hussein Xazi bu.re and Pl14 Sergeant Philipa Mo..sse,we were wnlking- within tb.e cc..np when they sc..w two persons nheo.d of tho□• · Those two persons were tho a.ppclla.nt o.nd t!10 clccon□ odo Suddenly, PI-11 Set Junn sa.id 9 ho b.oc...rc1. t!10 docoasccl cryil-ics ['J.'lcl sa.y:i.ni thnt ;_10 had boon sta.l)bod by· Nyangichori Ma.r1ro.? noa.ning tho appoll.:u1to Tho cloconsod wo.s o.skine for l1olpo P:-71 Sgt Juno.. Emel Pff4 Sgt. I•.fo.sawo uont closoro They smr tho nppcllnnt holcling a. lone lmif'c in l1is hnnclG They smr tho dococ.soc.1 blcoc.ling fron stc.b uound.s one of w::ic!1 1r2.s on tho o..bc.lor:ion. ':lhoy asked. tho o.ppollrmt 1f10..t ;12.fl hc.pponod. Tho 2.ppollo..nJG tole. tho uitncssos tho.t 11·6 :w.d sta.bbod tho tl.oconsoc.lo In fc.ct? HT4 S.5t Ho..:3s2.wo hc.d seen tiw a.ctual Gta1Jbi;1c;.. Ir.1r.1odiatcly, m'tor i.1Cl.r.1i ttine he 210.d. sto.bbocl tho clocc[',scd 1 tl10 o..ppclla.1t rn.a mmy C[U'rying tl1e knif' o with hir:1"' IIc 1~c.,n out of tllo Ccnpo Ile no..s chnsocl l)y P:T4 Si::_,n-t r!c:iosc..lre 9 but he disn,pponrod. People o..rri vocl 2.t ·tho sconeo Se;t. Mo.ssa.we wo..s one of tl10 people uho sent the cloceo..ocd to l10spi tr'.l c.t EntoblJc, but 11s his conc.li tion w0,s serious, tho clocec..sod wa.s tr11nsfcrrec! to Nh.tl.rl{;o IIospi tc.l in Kar.1pn.ln. On rocoivine the infomc1tion on t!10 nigl1t of 20 1\.%rrust 1901 9 PlT3 Cc..ptrl.in Bo..riki Urri,ssn visi tocl the clocco..socl c.t tho hospi tc,l nt Entebbo thn,t SD.Do nig}~t., Lntor 1 C.::.pt., Urc..sso.. went to the cnnp nm1.. found tho.t t!10 a.ppollo..nt hc.,:.l been c.rrontocl. C2..pto Urn.ss11 n.skocl tho a.ppollo..nt ns to who h21.l fJtnbbecl t)·.o clcccnscclo Tho o.ppollcmt a.c.l;:ii ttoc.l J,h2-t ho :rnd stabbocl tho c.locoo.s_ocl c.,ncl ho so.id. thc..t ~10 u.i~l so boc2.uso tho c.10002-sccl hnd 3"onc into ·cho a.ppollc..nt 's roon. The nppollo..nt further snic.l that ho !1od ttrown mmy t!10 knife in t210 bush-. Efforts vroro r.mclc · to find tho lmifc in tho busl::., but in vnino On tho follmrinc clny 1 29 ln10u.st, 1901, Capt. Ur11sM wont to Mulnco IIospi" tal in Ifur.1p2.ln. nncl ho wo.s infornod t11at the - 2 - . clocoasocl lw..cl c.liocL On 30 Auc,ust, 1901 PU2 Dr. AMul .rfo..lok porfornocl postaorton oxnr.1ino.,tion on tl20 clo2..Cl bo,ly o..ncl ho found~ in l:is opinion? tl.J.c-t cloe,tl: wo..s cluo to. blcoclinc; fror.1 nul tiplo injuries w'..c.ic!1 wore co.,usec.1- by n, sharp woapono Tho c.loctor founc.l t}:.c;!; t!:i.oro ,·ms blooding fron tho stono..ch, sploon, loft kidney o.ml tho intestines. Thora wore two wounc.ls - one on tho loft siclo of t~10 a.Monon ·and. 2-nothcr on tl10 wrist. Tho nppellant 's clofonco w0s t~10.:c ho ~1&1 been i:ri th o.. frioncl one Tobins Nwit2. on 2G Aucust, 1901 fro□ 3.30 p.,n. till 9.15 p~n. when ho wont to bodo IIe w2.s mTosted n.t 9d0 p.,n. in ~1is roon. Tho nppol12.11t denied conplctoly ·c::o..t ~10 h2.Cl ovor not tho c.1.ocoo..socl tho..t clo.y. IIo o.,lso cloniecl to· ho..vo nru:lo nn o..duission to miyono tl:o.t ~10 sto.bbocl tho docoo.,socl. Ee snicl ho was assc;ul tml rotor his n,rrost. Tl10 appolln,nt oxprossoc.l an intention to cD.11 To bins Mwi ta ns 2, witness nncl o..ftcr an ncljourn-.10nt for sovoral weeks, tho wi tnoss nppon.rocl but tho clcfonco counsel snic.l llo did not wisI:. to call To bio.s o.,s c., ,Ti tnoss. Tho first Grounc.l of o.ppo2.,l is t~:i.2.t there wn.s no sufficient oviclonco to support t!:c c2.uso of c.lodh Mrs. Rvrobo.,ngir2., loa.rnocl counsel for tho o..ppollo..nt, subni ttccl tlw,t c.1..oo.th could :.:.nvo occurrec.l fror.1 tho Hny· tho clocfors ho.ncllocl tuo cloconsocl c.ftor ho .-ms st2..blJo(l• Ehc roforrocl tho court to section 203 of tho Po112.l Code nncl to two Enilish cnsos of Ilo v Jordan (1956) 40 Cr .. App. n,oviow 153 and ::lo v Snith ( 1959) 2 Q,B 350 In tho Jordan C2.so nbno:rr.ml trontnont by tho doctors on.used clcatho In tho present cnso, however, tllorc can be no c.1.oubt timt tho clocon.sod diccl fro□ injuries to, 2..11d blocclinc; fro:i, the storn:i.cirh, kidneys n.nc.l t.11c spleen. Tho fr. ct tho..t ·cl.lore is no ovic.loncc 2.s to tho t~rpc of r.1oclicc1l trcat- nent rocoivoc.l docs not ::1oru1 tho.,t t:.10 doctors co;usocl clcnth. Furthcrnoro, tho oral cvi(.lcnco nnC:. tho postr.10rtcn o:;~2.,oin2.tion report clonrly show tho.t the cloco2,sccl lw;__l serious st2.b wo1,mc.ls on tho internnl orge.ns nnnecl? 2.,nLl there u2..s bloorlin,::;· fro::i t!.:oso or0 rnlS. '.fo cl.o not believe~ £'.J.'.Kl there is no oviclo;.1co, t~mt t~w doctors u~io 2,-l;tcnJcd t!::o clcco2.soc1 c2.usccl those injuries. ~w doctors sti tchoc.l t!,o uom1C.ls on tho nlx7.onon o.ncl on tl10 wrist.. T!10 two ui tnosscs? P.-T1 SG't9 Ju·.m nnc.l P.r4 Sgt. Hnoso..1-ro, s2.w t~:e blooclinc ut t2:c scone of crir.10 nnc.l t:'20 cloctor lr.t.tor founcl tho injuries to t210 internal. injurioso ~To :"2.vo no doubt t:.::.nt tho clocoo..scd. died fron tho injuries c0usod w110n b.c w0s sto..bboc:L, 2.11el not :fron t'. 1.0 sur5ic2.l irounc7.s. Uc v.rc clso cf tho view V,0t ovo:.1 if, for tl:e si1ke of o.re,u:.10nt 1 t!10 ~loccnsocl clicl not got proper noclicc.l trc2.t:-.10nt, tho person u~10 stabbed l:in is c.locncc.1 to l,o.,vo c2..usod. tl:..o cl.02.t~:-. unc',o:c section 203 (u) of tb.c Pcn2,l Coclo ,r!1ich proviclco M followsg- "203~ .Li. person is clooi:10C.1. to ::0vo cc..usocl t!::.o clontl:.. of o.nothor parson o..H~:ouc-~ !~is o..ct is not tJ:c ir:1':loclinto or sole co.use of do2.t!1 in o.ny of t!:o following co. sos - (c.) if ho inflicts bodily injury on nnot!::cr person in consoquonco of W!!.icl~ t:i.u.t other person unclorgoos - 3 - s1..i.re;ic0l or noclic2,l troc..t;~1ont wl:icl1 co..usos Llonth. In this Cc'.,GO it is irn.mtoric'.,l whct::or t~:oo troo..tr.10nt ,-ms proper or nistc:>,!rnn, if it un.s onploycll in good. f2,i th and. witl: cor.u:1011 lcnowlcc.lgo Gl1l sld.11~ but t!.:e person inflictinc tl!o injt.i.ry is not doooocl to ~:.o.vo cc:usocl tl:o clentl: if tho tro0tr.10nt u::ic:1.:: ,ms its ir.u:ioc.li,:,/Gc cnuso w0s not onployod in good fni t!1 or wns so onployod without corn.1on knowloclc~o or s!d.11; 11 In ·Glw present c2.so, t!.:.ero w2.,s no oviclonco wh0,tsoovor t!.mt tho noJ.icnl trontnont w2..s t:,.o ir.1r.1ec.linto cnuso of 2:is clonth. l!o fincl t~mt tl:c cloconsoc.1- dice.:. fron tho injuries inflictocl 2-n--1 1 t::orcfr.rc, t!.10 person wl:o inflicted t::ooo injuries cc1,uscc.7. the c.loc,t!:o of tllc clcco2,secl. The seconc.l grounc1- of q,pec.,l is t~,e,t there wo.,s contro..cliction in tho oViclenc o given by tho two principa.1 wi tnessos. Mrs. Rvro lJ<..,nc;irn subni ttocl t!.in:i; while PUf!. Se;t. l'fass2,wo !:>.8.Cl snic1. t:10..t P:71 Set. June.. touchocl tho appollnnt on tllo s!.1.oulclor w!:.on tho wi·linoosoo appro2,c:.1oc1. tho appellant 0,t tho scone of crir..-ic, Pm Srrt. Jur.m clicl not oo.J· c.nyt!1ing c.bout touchinc; the 0,ppollant. Wit:1 rospoct 1 ,·ro clo not 1in~1. ·[l.;f]J contradiction~ HT1 Sgt. Jur.10, w2.s not 2:t an,y tine nskocl if he touc::ocl t!io a.ppoll2.nt. So uho,,t c1.ppoars ·t;o bo tl .o position is t~:.o:t PU4 Sgt. JYI;:,.,ssrn·ro wc1.s noro c1-ot2,i1oc.l i:i.1 ].1is ovid.cmco. 0 1111t.1.t is inportc.,nt 9 ho1:1ovor 9 is t::.o.:1; bot~1 witnesses approoo~·wc1. tho c1ppoll2,11t soon cltor t:lo docoasoc.l uo.s sto..bbod. T!1oy· fouml tbo e,ppollo.nt st;:,,nclinc noo.r tho docoaoocl 1-r:10 wo.s bloocline:; fro::1 t:10 stcb wounc.lso T120 appollc.nt we,s holc.:.inc t~1c knifo 2.nc.l ho s2.iC:L he :1c..d st.:,,bbod tho clocoo..sod. with thc.t knife. Thero w0s i1O contrG.Lliction in tl:!.2, t ovic.lonc o. Hrs,. Rvrn bru1cira .:,,1 so said tl:02.t tho ic.lontificntion of tho ;:,,ppollant ,ms unroli.:,,blo as it wc>,s on c1 Lbrk nighto She ci toc.l t!K ca.sos of Abclo..l1,1h \Tonclo v n (1953) 20 Eti.Cli. 166 ancl Lus2.b2.p,y:a Si.yc.ntor.1i v n 1980 LI:.T 275. In both thooe co..sos identification uo,s by 2, sinclo witness nt nic;ht c,ncl_ under c.lifficult cond- itions. T!10 Court of Appeal sa.icl in tho Lusn1x1.n.y0- case e,s follows g- nuo 2{',Too 1 G.s r.10:ntionoc.l ccrlior on in this juclcuont 1 tlmt a. tric.l court cOJ.1 convict on -tl.:c 1.mcorroborc1tocl ovic:.once c.t 2., sine:;le ui tnoss of id.ontificc..tion if it is fully so,,tisfioc.l t~:e-t sue!: wi tnoss is tollinc; tl:o ·crut::, and nftor wc..rning itself of tho ll2..nc;ers of convictine on such uncorrobor2.ted oViclo;icoo ;i 1'!10 Com t f0tmc.l tho evic.lonco of tb.e sin5lo wi tnoss imrolia.blo 0 o..nd !1olcl thc..t it wo..s unsn.fo to conVict on hor uncorroboro..tocl ovidonco. In tho present co,,::rn, ~101-rovor, tho .ic.lontificatiou oviclcnco w2.s c;i von by two wi tnossos u~:o lmow t:10 c..ppcllrurc bof oro c.nc.7.. w~10 oven -'mlkoc. with l1ir.1 at tho sccno of cri□ o,, Tl1ore 1ms lij,.t fror.1 tllo noci,rby ~1ousos., So 1 tlloro cnn lJo no cloubt t~10:t tho nppollc,nt wo..s properly ic1.ontifioc.l by tho two witnossoso . ,,t!: - 4 - Fin2.lly; it wns subr.1i ttoJ. on lJcl~".J.f of tho nrpol12J1t tI1,:,, t tl10 npp0ll2.nt 1s defence of nli bi s~1oulc.l not ~w..ve boon re joctod 1 nm1. t!mt t!10 c'-ppclk..nt wns in !1is roor:1 u~1e:n tl10 offence w2.s cor.1r.1i ttoclo Ho ~lave nlremy foum.l t:mt tho o..ppollrn1t uns properly identified by t~:o two wi tnosscs, Tl:o question is whether tho Gonora.l Court l\Io.rtinl should ~1nvo accoptocl t::e defence of 2.libi to cronto doubt on t2c prosecution evidence. It should be poinkcl out t~1nt uhilo t!1c o.ppollnnt clo.i:.10d tb.nt ~1c wns olsowhoro wi t!c. 2, frioml u.1wn the offonco wo.,s cooni ttocl? he clid not c2..ll tlmt parson ns 2, wi tnoss., In tt.o c2.nc of Lulatikwn s/o Kn.bc1lo v ·u (1941 )0 El1.CA 46 tho Court of .l\.ppec1l for Enstor;1 .\.frico. se,i(.l ns follows g- "If e, person c?11::xgor..l with o., serious offence c.lloc;os t~:c1t e,t tho tine uhcn it was cooni ttocl l10 wns in sor.10 ot~:or plC'..co whore ho is well known, m1cl yot nrucos no effort to prove thnt fe,ct 7 wl1icll 7 if true? could 00,siJ.,Y' be proved? the Court nust nocossc:1,rily c:1,ttMh little uoic-ht to his n.lloes2,tion pc::.rticulnrly in the fnco of such clofini te eviclenco of iclonti ty e,s there wc1s ·in this c0-so., 11 11..·wine found tlmt tl'.o n.ppello..nt wo,s sufficiently iclontifiecl by tho two wi tnosses, wo find nothins· in tto dofonco to co..st cloubt on t!w i:..1.cnt- ificntion ovicloncoo Tho nppollc.,nt ~l[l,(1. clo.inccl thnt ho wns wi"tib. n friend? Tobio.s JY'rwi tn., in a roor.1 listoninc to t~10 rO,Clio D.t tho tine the offence uo.s conni ttocl. Bv:c 2rn cloclinocl to cc,11 Tobic..s c.s 2., witness E'.,l thouGh Tobias w2,s evnilo..blco Sinco wo o.,ccopt tho ovidonco of t!10 two ,eye wi tnosscs, wo o.ro s.:1,tisfiod tl:-.c..t t!1c 2.libi clocs not r2,iso n:ny roc1s0112,blo doubt on tho .pro- secution cvidoncoo There is nlso tlw oviclonco t~mt fao nppcllont o.c1.r.1i ttocl tho killinG to PU3 Cc.pto Urnssn. 1fo do not bolievo ho wo.s asso..ul tod n.s ho clainod.o In tl:-.o fino..l o..nnlysis, 1m c..re so.tisl'iocl t21c.,t the prosecution provocl t!10 chnrgc agninst tho 2,ppollo..nt boy·onc.1. roc.sonc,blo doubtQ Ile vms properly convictod c..nd sontencedo Tl:o o..prieo.l is clisnissoc.l. :T.Jo r.Y.INA JUDGE , A. BiJ:::£,TI JDDGE C3t~~ IT. i~. MSUMI -JUDGE Delivered in Da.r cs So.lnc..r.1 t!1is__4_th_1 _ _ _ _clay of Nove~.1bor 190G in the prcsonco of Hr., Ndy1.1nabo for t!rn o.ppel12-nt c.nu. Miss. Bnrab.onolm for tho Ileppblll4e~t.