19880929 TZHC Mtwara1
. . I, . ""~. ,~:~' ·... :.. ... ·1. / , .. ,; nr THm HIGH COU:rtT OF Tl:.NZ.rul'Il.. /.T M'IWlJUt.; .APPELLATil JURI1DICTION HIGH COURT CIUMINJJ., 1.PEJ.l'J., N0.107 OF i988 Oricrincl Criminal Caso No.184 of 1986 of tho District Court of Soncoa. Distl'ict at Sor1t.,rioa Bcfoxoa P.SoNo Tibond.a Dsq., Rosidont...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19880929 TZHC Mtwara1
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 1988
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
. . I, . ""~. ,~:~' ·... :.. ... ·1. / , .. ,; nr THm HIGH COU:rtT OF Tl:.NZ.rul'Il.. /.T M'IWlJUt.; .APPELLATil JURI1DICTION HIGH COURT CIUMINJJ., 1.PEJ.l'J., N0.107 OF i988 Oricrincl Criminal Caso No.184 of 1986 of tho District Court of Soncoa. Distl'ict at Sor1t.,rioa Bcfoxoa P.SoNo Tibond.a Dsq., Rosidont M~strate YUSUF WJTZI o •••••• o ~ •••• o o • o • • l.PP.TilLIJ:.NT versus 'IHD REPUBLIC ooooO ♦ •o••o~•····· RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Rubana, J. Yusuf Manzi and e..nothor person ·we:ro I convicted of stoaling 2, grin.ding nill and each sentonc0d to five yoars inprison.r::1ont. Yusuf Mnnzi has appealed asainst tho conviction and sontonco. The facts of this ce,so a.re sir.1plo. Tho prosecution alleged that i\wuf Manzi· and his collea{;UC had on the 22nd Soptonbor, 1986 ~>d a <I:> grinding oachino later positively idontified as bolongincr to one E. Mbo:na at tho house of IIadijo. Rajabu Pl-1 0 2. The storod grinding o~chino was □cant for a noii;:;1:ibour of Hadije. Ra.j2.'bu one Maulana and it was boo;::,i.Lf;lo the said t.l:J~- Ma;ulana was not at his hot.1s0 a.t ti-~o ti1.1e tho ap:poll2..nt and his colloauaue arc alleged to have .,md the f,Tinding oill that they requested Hadija Raja.bu PW0 2 to tcnporarily store it at her place. The :prosecution further alleged that tho ap:pclln.nt and his colloci,c;uo off loaded tho g.ctnclinc na.chino and loft. On tlloir return to tho house of Badija Rajabu PW.2 tho sane day, prcsunably to fcny the l!rindin.:; nachino to the house of Me,ulnna tho appollwit and his collo~'"'Uo 'were arrostod by the Police after they had beep. pointod out to the said Police by Haclij2, Rajnbu PW.,2. Tho appellant denied tho prosecution ceso that he end a colle~c of his had taken a. ~i~ nill to tho house of Hadij£1. !la.jabu PvT .2 on tho 22nd Soptaobor, 1986. Ho had oontionod that ho was arrested at. the house of Hadija Ilajabu whore a crowd· hc1.d gathered looki?l{:; at a. grinding oill ancl. that he h£>.d boon picked out "because of his youtb.f'ulnesso The ap:pcllroit further n2inte,inod that he hacl boon to this place alone and he ha.dn 1 t known even his co-accused ;boforo that day. - 2 Tho trial na{;i.st1~ato e.ft0r 0valucti11c tho cs.so for th0 prosecution and defence conviotod tho appellant. In his nor:iorand.uo of appec,l tho appellant rGpoats his defence at tho trict.l court and in soverd ws,ys qucstiont,l:t;he cor~coctness of his identification o,s one of tho people said to have taken the r.rillin& nac:1ino to t!1O ]10uso of Radija Rajabu Pt'1.2. Tl.J.c tri2.1 D2.t:'.;ist:cc.to had docl t with tllo question ·of identific<1tion pointin& out that tho tir:10 tt:kcn by the appellant and his colleac:,ue in aoeld.ng pornission of' Hadija Rajabu to store a GTind.ing oachino at her house, tlio off-loacl.inc; of the said erinding rno.cl1ino end the sto:t>a-Zo of the sru:io grinding :r:1ncllino o,t tho ki -tchon h().Cc p~coduced sufficient tirac for Had.ija Rajabu P1·i.2 to have nnrkod tho appollc111t and. his collo3.t,~e. I accopt this findinG considorinc furt!-:.cr thet this e::rorcise hn.d taken place durin8 broad day liGht and tho arrest of tho e,ppcllant and· his colloBt:,--uo took place a l!ihort tine followi11£; tho off-loading of the nachine at tl.10 houso of HcAija ~~jabu. I find tho identification of tho appellant as ono ·of tho people who had tak.on tho nillinc r:iachine n0ant for one Maula.na could not have been anyt:.ung but cor.rect. The nilling nachinc had boon recently stolen fron tho houso of one ~Ibona who was then out of his hone ~ccivi:ng ocdictl trcatnont at Lizabon area So~oa. The comriction was an:ply supported bj· tho evidence. I disniss tho appeal 2.gainst conviction. The aplX)llant has st;:i,ted that in p0,ssi11G sentence the tric.1 DB.o'"'istrate had not adequately addressed hinsolf to tho rai:liigc.:i.ting fac:bors in his favour. Ho outlines tho nitigc.ting factors for this court to consider while exnniltl11G the inposod sentence. Tclcing into consider~tion tho ovidoncc, I find the inposod sentence not oxccssivo. I d.isrliss tho appccl. against sentence. In totality tho ref ore the e.ppoal by, Yusuf' Manzi is d.:f.11:lissod in its entirety. ~~~ . JUC4:,'70 29.9.88