19891204 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
IH THE HIGH OOURT OEJ TAHZA.HIA AT Dli.H ES SAIJ\.Alv1 A??ELLATE JUlUSDICTION HIGH COU11T CI?.TMINAL APfEAL. NO. 79 of 1989 ( Frow the oricinal Criminal Case No. 45 of 1988 of the District Court 0£ Kiso.ro.we District at Kisarawe) HASSAN MAIVIDO MSATI • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • .APPELLAJ!T versus THE UNITED...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19891204 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 1989
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IH THE HIGH OOURT OEJ TAHZA.HIA AT Dli.H ES SAIJ\.Alv1 A??ELLATE JUlUSDICTION HIGH COU11T CI?.TMINAL APfEAL. NO. 79 of 1989 ( Frow the oricinal Criminal Case No. 45 of 1988 of the District Court 0£ Kiso.ro.we District at Kisarawe) HASSAN MAIVIDO MSATI • • • • • • • • • • • • • 0 • • .APPELLAJ!T versus THE UNITED lili"'PUBLIC ••• (DPP) • • • • • , ••.•• ,HESPONDENT JUDGMENT MSUMI, J. The District Court of Kiso.ruwe sentenced the 0.1:;~Jellnnt to five yea.rs impr:i.sonill,:mt after conv:i.ctinc_; him of steolinL; c,)ntrary to secti-m 265 of the penal Cocle. Tlu.s np:..-,enl is 2.~ninst both cGnVictLm nnd sentence. The brief' fc.cts of the co.se o.re thnt on 6th June 1988 a pump mnclu.ne belon[;in..:; to lfasibu,_;:l11i Villa.Ge wns f0un<l r.u.ssinc. In the course of investicnti.m one Hassan Omari Mnclega (Flt 3) told the ljulice thnt on the cby in questLm, durinc the nicht, he met the O.j_.)j_)Cllo.nt, Bresh JUCT!)e Msemo.J.cweli a.ml two other persons w.• Jm he diu. n0t kn.Jw, co.rryil'l(:; the o.llc,~eu water 1JUtnl) machine. E 'US orJerec.1 by Juobe to· help curry the mnchine. Anu. after cnrryinc; it f,Jr c. distanoem he wo.s 2.lloweu to t) but with n wnrnin:; thc:.\t he shvulJ. not tell anyone or else thoy W.Juld horra him. When Jurabc wo,s arrestee., he ,lecl the police to o plncc where the mnchine was h:i.cLcn but he mnnncccl to esco.pe when he wci.s bein:s esc,)rte0. to police stnti.m. He is still ot lcu\_;e. In c:.mVictil'lG the o.:;,,~.ello.nt thG lenrncd :ti.al district mo.cistrntc cxpresscJ his total so.tisfc.ction With the eviL:.ence of Mage[.;O.• The; lc~0.rm::d CJunscl who prosecuted the O.j_.)~1cn.J. nrl'.;ued tho.t the a:onvio"iiic.ni:i.i e_rrenoous o.s i·t is busecl )Jn circumstntic.l eViclcncc~ With resl-iect, it is not ~10.rt uf ,,ur crir:ci.nal 1.:-.w -;· .-~ no circumsto.ntio.l evidence is cnpa:;lc of sup~,o.ttin.~ o. c,.mVicti.m. The raost iIJi.J )rto.nt quolificntion .)n_ circumstnntio.l cViJ.cmce is th:_,t it must be such thnt is not cnix.i.ble ,_jf £Ll1Y rensono.;.;lc hy:i_.Jothesio cxceJt the L,Uil t of the o.ccused. In other w,Jrds the circumst::mccs c1ust irresistc.'.;;ly j_) 1)int nt the cuilt of the .:iccusec1. Hs,·vever 1 before npiilyi!l{; this test to tho ;_)resent cnsell is it true, o.s c:mtcnded by the l-...!, trneJ 0,.ow1tael1 thc-.t the conVicti.m is bnsctl on circumstnnctiru. cVidcmce. With rcopect, it is not. Appcllo.nt iG c,nmcctc<l to the nllcccd thC'ft by the cVid.onco •.Jf Mo.cle(~o. (?W 3) i .... • ~ - who clru.ned tQ ha.ve seen him t9ucthcr with Jumbc and two other j_.)Crsons carryinc the pump cx1chine in q~~,tii)l'l• This is m,)re them circuras-t.untiul eVidcncc. As a matter of prncticc the eVidcnce of Mudc[Sn ou:..;ht to ho.vc been corrobo:ttntocl before it is nctcd upon. The c ..Jnduct of the np].Jollo.nt consequent to his arrest, t,) a ccrtnin amtcnt, e:;ivcs cre,:::.c;nce t-) the cVid.cnco of Madecu. In this c mnccti ;n I hn vc in mind the c.1)1.,dlnnt I s act of escpnin;_; fr,::irn the custody of the :i_:>olic~ when ho wo.s ;;cine escorted to remand l)riS,Jn. Like tho lcerned trial mc.cistrc,te, I om n-)t impressed by appcllnnt 1 s clm.t1 thnt ho nttCE11Jted tho escape while in · a stnto of racnta.l c.)11fusion •. Like Jumbo, his CJlla.b.Jllntor, who, nlbcit · tcm.pornrily, r!lDhcicuct t J run 2-.wny froo the lonG nrm of the law, D.j_)j?ellc.nt . a.t;ter wns pr)mpted to escape b/i. renlisin,; his incrimincitin._:: r.;Jie in tho CJcU.S3i•.in of the nlleced theft. J.s a. whole, the conViction is fnul tloss. And since the Si.:mtcnco imj_j,)Sed is the statutory lilinimura, this npponl must fnil. Hence it is dismissed. Jtr.JGE 4/12/89.