19900911 TZCA Mbeya1
.:.T HBIJY..1 c:anun:..1 ..:...i."'")~.L No. 83 oF 1990 K.".Jl.OL DI.J.:JID.:'.:... 0 Q O 0 0 O 0 0 • 0000000 \. 'I'PJJ .aEPUBLIC., • · • • • • 000000~•. .?..::JSPOND:'.::liIT ·(;~pp.eel from th0 Judcor.i.ont of tl10 lligb. Court_of TQ.nz~ni~ ~t Mp~ndn) (Hchor..10 2 Jo) de.tad tho 6th d.::..y of Doco1:.1Jor 9...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19900911 TZCA Mbeya1
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 1990
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
.:.T HBIJY..1 c:anun:..1 ..:...i."'")~.L No. 83 oF 1990 K.".Jl.OL DI.J.:JID.:'.:... 0 Q O 0 0 O 0 0 • 0000000 \. 'I'PJJ .aEPUBLIC., • · • • • • 000000~•. .?..::JSPOND:'.::liIT ·(;~pp.eel from th0 Judcor.i.ont of tl10 lligb. Court_of TQ.nz~ni~ ~t Mp~ndn) (Hchor..10 2 Jo) de.tad tho 6th d.::..y of Doco1:.1Jor 9 1989 in Crir.iinal Sessions, Cc.so Uo. 8 of 1987 JUDGHSHT .OF T.Tl COIBT MN'7t-V,ili.1. s f J ; o• ~4 O,i,.\.ct On tho 1~ tl.1 d2.s of !,by 1984 ono Go..briol; lToombucllu m'ld his wi!O.. . Generoza, PW,.2J visited t~1oir rolativos e.t KoJ:::uronga. vil10-t:,v'O in r ~ District who:r-o thoy h2.d lux1ch. .:'.Ster luJ1ch l1Ibormbucllc:. decided ~ hcWC '; siesta outside tho house under shC'Ilo of c. troo • · ..:~s ho wr,s sl~e:p;i.ng there I ha was suddcmly- ntt2.ckod with Q. pa.nga in tho neck and died on 'ihO spot. - The m~ttor w~s roportcd to i;l10 ~olico and wheals of in~jigations culoinated to the 2.rrcst nnd. ..:-..rr8.i.gnn0J.1t of tho appol].c.nt 1 i:;d.Tol :Siµnd.n. 1 wit !l. r..1'1XCdax. I j, I :~ftcr a full, tl:ictl the lligh Court. (Mc::.1omo~ Jo), . e.iqin,g, . in n:,panda i found tho C?l)Oll,.2.nt guil t.y of tho off onc0 of r.11.1:r-d,c:i= llS - ~ Dm. sentenced. hio to cklc.t...11.• .t..&,'"'Tioved by tho find.inc of tho High Court ho hD,a appo<lJ,cd to this Court,. Mr. Tu.1rui1job2. 9 lDcrnod Counsel., w~~-o e:,dvoc.::,tod for tJ.1.'1 ~l).l)Cllemt before tb.ia Com:t o.r8\,l,ec1. -that uv::.:>ollant "s d.cfonco of alni in. t.b.Q Hi~11 Court wc.s lT1.~onc;l;7 rojoctod boc::-.1:so t~10 2,')··,Jll:.::1t tm.s not 'au:fficio.n~ .·f'. identified. as th~ por:son w!l_o fn:ta.ll;t o..tto.d;:od. t~:,;~ docoo.~d or ti."1.c I '-· 2 /2~· t:f! fr L10,tcriP,l dqr. t:f.' It wo.s tho loc..rnod counsel's sub::iission th2.t tho trial f(fr\vour't s:J.ou.ld not llc.vo roliocl on tho cviclonco of Gcnoroza, ( P] o2 ) " /. ( rccc.rding idontificc.tion of t~10 appollc.nt. ,~ f llh'..- T1,,1Jamjoba fin::::.lly c..ri;rt.lOC\ t'.lo,t Gonoroza wc..s, ( 2..t tl-:o ti□o she t ( ., said s~10 identified t:10, aJ)pollo,nt), in panic and confused duo· to tho ~ death of her hus1xmd and tl1eroforo, it wr.-.s subwi ttod" could not properly hc.,vo identified tho killoI'. The Com:-t ucs invited. to nllow tho cppoal. · I tho conviotion and. 2.rguod tl1G.t t~10 offence wns cor.1J71i ttod in 1:Jroad d(l,y light.; :~ccording to f;;:· -, :3o~'wcji! s · c.,:;_'c,7.l11ont tl~.o oviclenco of Gen0roza, . (P1L2) ~ that s:10 ictontifiod. t~10 c.pl)ollc:mt o..s t:10 person who attacked her husband is fortified.. 1)y yio oviconce of F<'Iakc.la, (PW o3), to whoso house tho appollnnt D.rrivoc soon c.i'tor tho killinG c.r~ed with o, panca~. Tho le2,rned Senior .Jto,to k'..ttorney 2-lso referred t~e Court to tho ovid.onco of Baho..ti Go:rvas, (H:~5), who wcs 'also attacked with o, panca. and had her hand cut off on tho Dntorinl dc.y •. It wes suboittod t~mt this witness also iclcmtifioc: tho cppollcnt as tho one wl10 nttncked !1or c.nd t!:lc doccasod on Thora wcs no dis:;mto in tl1is cr:·,s0 t:C.:\t t::o deceased; G~briel lv'rbonabuchc;., wr~s brutally c.ttr:1ekod 0,nd. kilbcl in broad cli...".y light.; Genoroza, (PTIT ,2) 1 W?,S prosont when t'.10 kill inc hc-.ppancdo She s.c..id she. sc,w tho person w~10 o;tt2.ck0d c.nc. killod ~,.c:;. ~1us'l)~_nd <-,nc:t closcribod tl1c 0 killer's- attire as of tho colour of rod soil ,,ncl th2.t llo w2.s a.rt~d.. with a po.nga.,. No soonor b.;::,d the decousod boon killed a porson appeared ~- Ncl-ce.la' s house arr.10d with 2, pc.ncc,o !~cco:rdinc to the avid.once of :Mn.lmlc1, (PU" 3), the_ r:m.n WG.Ei drossod in a s:1irt r.nd. trousers of red ~~,:-c.blour ...... · 3 TThon. ho offered o.. 0110-ir to tho str::-,nC,e:r l-;.o declined c.ncl took to llis heels _and, o.ccordil1G to the eviclonco of HcJcc.la., ~,hon ho c:1::socl hi□ t!:lo str::mgcr threatened to kill hi□ se.yinG _;__ 11 CoL10 c1ncl I will kill ;:,rouj I hc.ve nlroD..d.y killed two people" i Hclco..lc 1:ia.n:.."tt3'ed to ovorpowo1~ t::-.e st:rcmt;o1~ c..nd with tho e.id of other villo.c;oI's ho w2,s sent to }?olico Stc,tiono Tl10 · person is the _ nppellnnt; wllo o..s we hc,vc nlroo.dy □cntioncd 2-l,ovc;1 was chuccd with end convicted of tho nurder of Gnbriol 1'-1bonabuchc:.. ~ho crucicl q_uostion before- t~:c lower Court w2.s whether there wns sufficient ic1.ontification of tho eppollant ~s tho person vtl10 o.ttackod o.nd killed tho do con.sod on 11 /5/84. Don.lil')G ~ri t~ o.. sinilar question tho :Jo.,stcrn ..'..fricn Court of l1ppoo..l hnd this to sayz 11 In every cc.so in whicl1 there is a question a.s to tllo identity of t~o o..ccusod, t20 fQ.ct of there having boon a description giv9n nnd.thc to:rms of t...'1.d description m-e rn1ttors of tlle highest it:1portn.nco of which ovidonco duo..ys Ol,lf;ht to be 0 iven, first of o.11, of couxs9, by tho person or persons w;:io c;o-vc t~o closcr:i.ption and purport to identify tho o.ccusod, o..nd tl:,on by .tho person or persons to whoo tho description wc::.s Given,.'' - R v T-'IOJI:J1C::O- DIN f:.LLUI ( 1:942) 9 il.~C.'1. In tho pro sent cc.so Gonoro.zc., ( Plf ~ 2) , go.vo tho do script ion of tll_o c.ttiro tho v.,ssc.ilc.nt wa.s woe.ring to t~ policQ-. Soon -2..ftcr a person of the sc.co attire wo,s crrostod by Mclee.la., (PWo3)~ ~nd 1 if t110 evidence o'f-_ ,, Mclca.la WE.s o.nytl1ing to co by thu parson, now tho q.ppollant1. c~nfcssod tho,t 11.o hc.d o.lrccdy killocl tw~ pcoplc 0 No doulJt by sc.ying thr.t he had c.lroc.dy killed two pooplo -t~10 o,ri:}?ollo.nt 'boliovod tb.o..t tll.c. child he ha.cl also slc.shed wi tll. o., p2.ncc1 hv,d 2.lso died. Taking into c..ccoun:.t the fo.,ct thC:t tho offepcc wc.s comni tted in 1Jroa.d I dc.y light 2-nd· tho ovido.nco of Gcne:rozr., PUo2, corroborZ'.tod, 2,s it ·wns, by that of MD.kc:.lv,, P:J 0 3, re 0 e-rdin0 t~10 o.ttiro of tho c:.ssc..ila.nt, and what the nsso.i12-nt hnd done, we .:.ro s2:.tis:hod th::c,t tho question of □~to.ken idontificction of tllo o.p:pcll;:·;at by Gono:rozc.~ (?:r~2), as tho p0rS0n who . -,. ·• ...... /4 . r 4 o.nd kiilod tho deceased wc.s safely excluded~ • Tho loa.rried tricl jud.Go howovor Disdiroctod hir.1solf when ho referred to appellant's o.11.ogod II ca.utionocl str.-,tooont before Corporal .i~bu" 9 in assessing a.ppollant' s credibility.. Thero wo.s no cn.utionod sto.tencnt 1JY tho a,:ppol12-nt produced in Court cs oxb.ibit~ Tllct. boine so tho loa.rnod judge clearly erred in roforrinc to ov;idenco which wc,s not before tho ' Court o.ncL to which tl10 o,ppollc.nt he.cl no opportunity to rebut,. I We arc howcvo±- of tho view that t:-~o r:iiscliroction was not f::..tol to tho ·prosecution cc.so., On t:.lo tot2.lity of t?.10 ovidonco no O{;"Z'OO with tho finding of tho Rig:.1 Gov.rt tlmt it wo,s tho o.:r,:rp_oll;:,.nt w~·,o inflicted tho fdo.l injuries to tho docoo.sod 9 c.nd, takinc into o..ccount thc,t ho usod o, pc.nga, c1 lot:.,n.l woe.pan, tho pc..rt of tho boc.y t\ directed tho blows ruid tllo doctor! s' ropo:d, o:::c:.1ibi t P1, whicl1 is to t:_o effect thd t:.10 neck wes aluost sovorod, tho appellant uust hc,vc forL:ocl cm intention to kill tho docon,sod., 'lo ['{,Too with ]){'ir~ 3oncwv..jif ~ subr..i:::.sion -tlmt tho o..ppolla.nt was rightly convicted of ouxdor and we uccordingly _clisuiss tho appeal. n;~T:JD at ilrBEY..\ tais 11th d2.y of Scpto;.Jbor, 19900 JUSTICJ OF ;..rPE.:lL JUSTICE OF :J:P:c:.L I certity tha~ this is n true