19900523 TZCA Dar es Salaam3
nr TJ:.:J COURT OF .:'U'P'J..U, OF TJ.WZ~'mLl. ..'..T D.':.It JJS 3J.L.'..:i.l: t J.'.'Jl.UiI IT~'.JL. ... • 0 .• • • /..PP"JLL:.NT T:..:.J RJ?CDLIC • • nooe>heoo~• • ·.• RJS:?0?7DTJT (.'.~y}?ar.l f1.~on fae conviction of the !Iic:;ll Cou;d of T~.nzo.nie, at Kt':ra.ra) (Hf),ina 2 • J •) d2,t0d t~:e 22nd day- of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19900523 TZCA Dar es Salaam3
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 1990
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
nr TJ:.:J COURT OF .:'U'P'J..U, OF TJ.WZ~'mLl. ..'..T D.':.It JJS 3J.L.'..:i.l: t J.'.'Jl.UiI IT~'.JL. ... • 0 .• • • /..PP"JLL:.NT T:..:.J RJ?CDLIC • • nooe>heoo~• • ·.• RJS:?0?7DTJT (.'.~y}?ar.l f1.~on fae conviction of the !Iic:;ll Cou;d of T~.nzo.nie, at Kt':ra.ra) (Hf),ina 2 • J •) d2,t0d t~:e 22nd day- of Septenb~r, ,r 1989 in Crj_o:.1i:ml 33ssions C2,se .:.:;o. 1 of c 1989 T1.1is is an 2,:9peLl of Ja::1d_ Isae,il uho wc:,S condor:med to death by the B:igh C'ourt of T2nzani2, c. t t:t:,r,ro., presided 1:>-y ?:'...TIL'.., J •, for the rm.u:-dor of Suw2,bu d/o So,Dl i c Tho app0ll2nt u;;.,S 2. next door neighbour of t:.10 deceased lrho wo..s In tho 0vonin:3 of 12th 3epto□'bor, 1988 i.mkn01m people th:re,r stones on t:.~o roof of t'.J.C a:i_:,poll2nt Is house. Understand~bl;y Both p:,r.3 o.nd le.is coll02.{;1.10, :a/:J:\:JU S..~IDI :.t..S:::::IDI (P':-T.4), o..n occu1x:-..nt also of the sar.10 hot.~o v,s the d0cec,sod, doni~d to h;;.vo conr:ii ttod tho ):1.Uisancc. .':.. 1)riGf ouro'J'.'Cl .... clove loped - bet!mon • t;1O e.:'.l")Oll~nt rnd P:-fs. 3 -- a.nd 4 1rho ran 2,,;ray ~ Sor.10 ninutes 12.tor tho 2,1):)ollc::int c:.~\i_)roechocl tl;.a deceased 2.skL"lC foJ.' t;:.·.o ~,}:3:::c2,1)outs of P:-To3 2nd. a,t t1::; sano tine accusing reacted by pushint3' hiD cl.om1 and that inci tcd hi."1 to stab her t,;rico aftor ho hr.d recovered :.1is st,-:-,ncc ~ nro Jadoja, the ba:rnod advocate for tho c,:;>pcllant, subni tted throe grol..1.nds for tl20 a:ppo2,l. T:Ic first pointed 01..1t a series of discrop2.ncios in the ovidoncc of the :JI'osccution ;ritn~sses. For oxanplc·, ho s2.-icl that P"'.·To2 tc1lkcd of t-rro incidents~ one bot,rocn tho r,ppcllant and PlTs.3 and 4 n.nd the second ui th t~'.e c~ococ.,sod. :1-::oyo-,ror, PU .3 shouod that there 172,S· just one incident. Tho~1 P~-r. 2 claihs not to have boon around durinc tho fi:rst incident ul:.ilo p::J'.3 and. P:T.4 2,ffirms tbn.t ho uas at hone uith· t~e dcco2,sod. :.gein ?~T • 2 d.oposc8: t::2, t the a.p:;,Jollatt had tclcon soHo alcol1.ol u::.,orow P;T.3 scid t:.:,c;t. :·:o :1cd not. E:;:-. Jadcja 2..clcnowlJc.;pd tl:2,t tho discrepancies c:.ro noi t:::0:2 ;;:.'laI'inG nor najor yot cc..nnot be clisnisscd and t!:c..t t'..:03, 2.ro o:1ouc;h to c2-st- c. doul)t tl:at tho events were not c.,s na:rratod by p;Ts. 2, 3 2,!J.d 4. B:o fortifiod this st2J:1d 1)y pointing out tho f.:i..ct tl,~t D/CPL. G:J0:,1ITT (P:T.6) p1·opcr-cd t>.o sketch nap (2xh ..P4) on info11Jatio11 givcrt sololy 1)3~ tl-:.c nj?:pellc.nt. This su::gosts thc::.t the appellant ,-rr;,s the only ono u::o k.110,r wJ:2,t lm:i:)~,oned encl t:.-.z,t Piis. 2f 3 2,•.nd 4 were not e;roui tnossos. iJ!:,.o socoi.1d. c:9~ound 2,:;.~y.od by i'.1r. J~oja m:·.s tl:..r..t the loarnoci. t:i:'ial Jud;c s:.:,oulcl. hr,vo co;.1sidorod tl:.c defence of provoca'tion end s~::ould hn;-10 c:Cl.dressod t>.e 2,s2ossors on t]1e SD.DC. Finc.lly, !'Ir. Jadoja su~mi ttod tl~.c.t tl:o learned tri2,l Jud.,_')J ::n--red in ir.1posin5 on t:J.o app'cllc..nt tho burden of p.rovinc; l:is clcfonco of intoxicc..tion. Sc said tl:ere aro two linbs unC:tcr Soct.14 of t:.:.o Pond Code. Ono is under sub-section (2) 1-r~.1oro t!:.o onuG is on t:::.o e,ccusod :person "uut uncl::,r sub:...section ( 4), ul-:..ich provid.os for t].:.e n::icc',tion of intent bocc.usc of intoxication, tho onus rc,.mi.11s uith tl:e prosecution to s!:o,;r tb::t dospi to tho intorice.tion the c,p:pcllrnt had forqod t:.:o specific intent. •.•. /3 3 On l)eJ-:..2,lf of tl10 :2.o:;::,ublic and resistinc; tl'.c C,]J?OC.l 1ras Lr. Kru:ibc.. 9 tJ:e locrnod State .:_ ttorney., ITo conceded to t~-:,o discrep2,ncies but ._; stilici tted ttit tLoj~ ·i;e-:i::e ninor e,nd· clid not occcssion a,n;y- iJ.1justicc. ~r ·• The onl;r issue, l::3 contonc1.od, is 111:otl::or P':Js., 2; 3 und 4 ~1ero o~?o-uitnossos <i' or no,t. rro rn:.;-i.1.od tb.2.t t1:.o l.:::2.rnod trial Jud.co wJ:o sa11 t110 ·fn tnossos boliov::ld thODo .... s for pI'o~-ocation Er., Kel.102, so.id. t::~2,t tl.101~0 Ti2,S no n2..toricJ. on u~:.icl: to i;).:c,t a.cfoncoo Fine,ll;y, liro ICiJ,i.1b2. .su.br:!i ttocl t1.12.t into:i-..icction 1ms o.dvancocl c,s a.n cftorthoucht. It ;,as plo2.clod for ; . -... t!10 first time at tho trial 1mt it was not :raisocl in tho extra-judicial ·"'3''. --~... st2.tosont (D~1.P2)., In c.ny c2,so tl.:o conduct of_ t:~.o c.:ppollo.nt dtor tl:.o . incidc,:1t is not conso1'1.C',11t vi tl: c1 porson 1(.,.0 coulo. not fom tho intention to kill or ;:;.t. loc::,st to cc.use grievous bodily harD.., · It is true tl:c.,t there 2,ro G. m.uJb'.)r of discrcixmcies wi tl:fo ·tJ.10 oviclcnco of tl':_,:} p1~osocution. I::ouovcr, essentially tho story of ?7-is.2, 3 and 4 is thc..t tho c,p~)ollcs:.nt killed tho c.0002.socl 2nd this !1as 11ovor 1J0on contr-o.dictoc1 15y t):..::: clofcnco. T:.:o onl3· isst:.o is 1r~:ot]:or tho killi..."lG irc:.s of t;:,o opinion tl:z,t t;.:o C,:JpOll2.nt' s 6'1..tll t )::c,s 1Joon ostc.'blis~:.ea. i)o;ym1d roason2.blo dov.lJt e,s :re s:~.G.11 s::m-r in duo cov.:rse. provocc:.tion h2,s to be consic".orod '.)37 ti.:.:'.l ·trid Co'Lu:-t oven if it is not fu.ilurc to do so is 2. so1·ious ono'L~gl:. Liisdircction to co.use e, conviction Eouovcr, in tl:c p:ros:mt c2.so t;_,o clococ,sec1. pusl::.od.. clmm tho 2,:ppoll2.Y1t OJ::pO"ctec. e, reaction to l::.is slappins th0 clccoc. scd., ncsiclos·, o. p2.I'r,e;:raph • 4 .. - in 3;.)ct. 202 of tlcJ ?o;:12,l Cod.a ( Cc:,p .. 16) ';-:-'.:,ic:.l c..ofinos :;_)rovoc2,tioi1 provic1.os thct: act 1-r~:ic> a p.E'son cDos in consoq_u0nco 11 •.\.n of inci to::iont givon by 2nothor ])Ol'son in ord.or to. inc7-uco bii:1 to clo t:~'.o 2,ct 2.nd thoi:'o1)y to f1.-r:cnis):. en o::ccuso for cor.1r.1i tting 2J.1 a.ss2,1-1.l t is r1ot pro-:J'oc2,tion to tb.c. t otl:.Jr porson for 2. n e,ssc.i:l to 11 .;-To thoroforo, ,_-,groo ,Ti tl: 1':r. K2.nl)D, t:!:2,t on tb.9so feats provoc2..t:\.on On intoxico.,tion tbo 1-::srn:.id trinl Jud:;o found thct tl·.o 2,~)poll2..nt 11 lmd d:runk alcotol, but ho ~rr,s not so drunk as· to be 1.me,~)lo to kno1-r sh2.rpcnin:3' of tho lmifc c.ncl tho tl:roc:-,ts t}J.c..t ho ,;ms G'CinC to injv.J:'o so:.1oono 2.ro consic1.oroc1.. to ;J-3 onouJ_,. proof of intention, t).:on into:::i.02,tion is not a defence 2,~.-c,i12,~;le to tl-::0 c,ppcllant. forDinG tho intention to kill or ce..v.so gTiovous hc..rB? ·~o clo not fincl 2.ny nro ono-ugl:: .proof of into;:1tio11. Tl~.or s2oulcl 1Jo tdrnn in t:::oir contoJ..-t; ·uont to l:is ->.oBo 2,:."ld 02no be.ck to tl'.e house of t).:.o doco8.socl, sor.10 fifteen p2.cos or so 2,uay, ,ri th tho knife 2. nd ste,rto~l s'..::c',J.-.9011:L."lG it wl:.ilo uttorin,~ tl:oso thi·octs~ _:_ftor tho incidont ho tl·xo\-~ mm3- tlc.o lmifo, wont "'0::ck to his hone, took up l:is s}:.irt e,:i.1d. t~:-.on wont to sm"':i:-ondor l:insolf to tl:o Police. Tl.:.J follo~ri;.1:; c1:.0,3- ~:-..o locl tl--.o Polioo to -:-r:·.oro ho b.o,cl t:-.ro:m 2,-,,12,y tb.o knife 2,nd. it w2,s retriovodo Nou t:-.Jso 02..rrnot 1)0 s2,id to ;JO actions of one w:;,.o could not forn rm intent to c1..o w->s t )::.c.. s :Jo,m done• 0 ••/5 5 --' 1-Tc, tl:ci~oforc 9 u:pl.,olc1_ tl-:.c conviction 2..nd. find no nori t 2.t 2..11 D_'a.'J.13D at .nJ8TIG~.:: OF __":J?F'l'.L " .nJSTIC::J OF .'..?:P:J.:'.1 copj' of tr.. o original.