19900223 TZCA Dar es Salaam10
" [, .. - (-:;c~-~-.l=g :;:J;_:,,;·;:;:·cL". 2 J o:.~ 2 R,:1.::..·__ ;y.:_:..;_:r, J,L, Imel ~::-LLIL:i. 2 J.L.) Ch:C:IL.r;.1 .~PVi:::.1 1:-c. 64 07 1989 . pe-1 ( ••P _. d, - - co··.1·,r1· c·:,J·.o·,-_ o,.._... +.1-~.e fron1-. ..u:.~C V u •' u ~ in Cri::linal Sessio:rn Ca,:-3e •. o. 34 of 12_88 . . C:.e2.tti passed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19900223 TZCA Dar es Salaam10
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 1990
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
" [, .. - (-:;c~-~-.l=g :;:J;_:,,;·;:;:·cL". 2 J o:.~ 2 R,:1.::..·__ ;y.:_:..;_:r, J,L, Imel ~::-LLIL:i. 2 J.L.) Ch:C:IL.r;.1 .~PVi:::.1 1:-c. 64 07 1989 . pe-1 ( ••P _. d, - - co··.1·,r1· c·:,J·.o·,-_ o,.._... +.1-~.e fron1-. ..u:.~C V u •' u ~ in Cri::linal Sessio:rn Ca,:-3e •. o. 34 of 12_88 . . C:.e2.tti passed on -;;:1e ap:1:)ellarit by the E:igh Com·t (T::iaina 1 J .,) citting a·i; LbcU. J:.fost of tl1e fac·~s were not ir1 dispute.. ~:>.e appellant e..::.1c,l t~1e c.lecea:::ecl 'Th.e appella;rc J.12.d been .:-•:-;..1· r:.:cinlcing f.rm abov:i; 12 a.r:1. till about 5 p~Dd he was said to "be very c'cnml:. a kl:.ife 1 whereupon t:ie 0.eceasecl i,1terve11ed. ancl asked. hi:w not ·co cc.use c1-isttu·bance., In reoponse to that tl~e appelJ.an"i:i ·0-0..rnecl to the clece,'.'-sed a:1cl stab1Jetl him with the L:nife in the l1eacl. i1l:e cJ.ec0<.-:.sed. fell clown. appellant ran away bv..t shortly re-cv.rned to :~lie sce:-:.e wi tl1 a panc;a~ Ire inflicted panga cu:i;c on the deceasecl 1 s head 2,f·.ccr ·,·r1:dc~1 lie ran away leaving the dece2,r_;ec~. 0;1 -;;:ie gT01.111cl f2.tn.l13, 1raw.1.cledG Deceased. c1.ioc.: o;:ly oelf-clefonce Emel iirco:.:ic~:'.;io,1 i."'.,;;; his defoncec. The trial court, b.owe-ier~ reject-eel both c~cfencos. 0 •••• /2 .- .j •r .. ' . , .... in J, 0GGO:,:co I 1020~100 of b-(;o::ica-cion o.~1d rojoc·~oc_ oviclcmco :i.1ot mough :JOl'oly to si1ow t:.1e,t -~.ie j_:iri □ onel' was ve1·-y d.r-~u'Jlq tho ca..1rt l1as to co fu1,,.,.;her and 7Jo sa·cisfiocl -chat· the prisoner 1-12,~: so c~rt).i1.k tho.·G llo wc.s i:,.1capa-blo of :f O11:1i11g the i:c,·i;o;.rc to kill I for:1in3 ·i;J:10 i.r~ent ·co }.::ill o;r Ca.1.IB0 griovouo hc.r;:i, btr~ -c11c cour-0 h ..... r to clociclc J••• (..111.:.i o;, tlmt issue witl:. l'o:f orej::.co to the e-v . , on c e L: -~llG case· as a w~1ole .. 1.CL In ·;;ho . .., e C ,:.S -'-'10 1,l -·-~·.-.1 u.!. l.c:, ·•·d"" J~l ...,c''-,o,.. t:>e u. cC.c.!. S.JOd ~-l.J •,·,..,.. S cl·" - ·'o C .,v.!.12. m·,.o~~,1·0,1 .., .L1, "-~ _ ~ • S:.te loa.r:rnd j1..~c1ge fo-~mcl ·clu:it, the nppollant gave a clear ffi1c1. d.e-~r,iloc.l accoimt of w~1c1t l10 clicl befol'e, during and. after t110 l;:illing.,· After s·cab~:iii1f,' tho C:.eco2,cod I · wore not co;1siston:i; witl.1 a person who wcs so c7..nml:: 2,;; to be i11cz~pnble of for:::1L:ig t~1e intent to kill· or cauao g:riovoEs l~,rn., We a:cc m:.ablo -~o fmut tl12;i; ren.soninge In co;:1ing fo tht;c conclusion -~l1e lcc:.n1od fa,i2,l judge 2,l so tool: into accom1t th2,t. while ·chc appellant "t·TC.,8 rctu.rni:1g to ·i;hq scene wi tl:. ·c::10 pa~1ga ho i:lOt PoW.2 to wllo:".1 lie declared hiG intention to f'illish off J~,, 1,1.v c1.ccensod11 ~ But what is cv011 ;.1O.:ro importa;rc is t!J.isg The a ppel la1ct i;.1 l:.i s evic:.cnco at the triru ro:_Joatodly plen,,locl tllc c:.o:fo:.100 of i::.1to:-;;:icr,cio11 -;:210 appoll2,nt j aac1- inC:ccc"':. on ·0110 cvidorice -thoro could. bo :.10110. 23rd clay of Febr11ary, R. IT. IC( S.:TC1~ 4 I certify -cha·;; t>.io is e true copy o-? t::,o origin2,L, ( ' SEFI OR DEPUTY REGI S'.1.Tu'.R. \..