19910321 TZCA Mbeya1
I • , III '!if£ COURT OF Af>PEAL OF T.AliZANIA AT DAR ES SAL_Ap~ - _;, I .. ,r', • . ..• lgo~,. ~ , J,4,, ~ u , J.A., &,;d IvJA.RIG»10, M• ,J,4,L·-•--. · ··. -----ORD".JlUL APPEAL·NOt -77 OF 1990 / , / I BETWEEN I •· AllBIWO MA.S01qrn. • .... ·- .... • • ---- -----~o. •••• • • • • • .• • • • • . . • ·•...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19910321 TZCA Mbeya1
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 1991
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
I • , III '!if£ COURT OF Af>PEAL OF T.AliZANIA AT DAR ES SAL_Ap~ - _;, I .. ,r', • . ..• lgo~,. ~ , J,4,, ~ u , J.A., &,;d IvJA.RIG»10, M• ,J,4,L·-•--. · ··. -----ORD".JlUL APPEAL·NOt -77 OF 1990 / , / I BETWEEN I •· AllBIWO MA.S01qrn. • .... ·- .... • • ---- -----~o. •••• • • • • • .• • • • • . . • ·• RESPONDilN~ . ,I . --·-.{A.ppea.l.--from .the..oonvio.tion and. sentenoe ot • I'· , j .i •• the High. Court-.of - ~ ~ L .- ~...... .... ,_ .:.- .... , J.,.. .• U;[rema, PRM - EJ) dated the 15th ruzy of February, 1_9.89 - • I •I -( ,_ in ·. C.riJninal S_e,!!oions Cas~ lfo, 9 }4 of t~8· ·1-........ ...,._•• ...... . . . OF ~ID; COURT · .JUDGilill:JT . ....... .. ..... . ·: .· ... Kr• !..Oe Mrema. 1 the _P.r:i.ncipal Resid.eltt Magistr~te1 in the· ,e%81'Cise- , of ~1s e.xten.ded jurisdiction:, convicted -'i;he apP,ellant, "':WJO li:/~S01'1GE2A.1 . . . ,. . ~ . of the mu.rd.er of ane I ESTIIER zi.:uu:, at Chi ta ·Villa&e Kilanboro ·Dtstl'i.Q.t• . • • Being 41$satisfied with that t~e app~llaxr'li now appeals before us.· /' · In the eV~"'liz,g of 5th Ma.roh1 1985 tb.e deceased4w~. a.tta.oket. by sa· . i J ' peopl-e when she wa.s returning home. She raised ·an a.la.rm whioh.,Wa.S ' -~es~ond.ed to by her mother, PEILm.WA KOtw.A., (PW.3) who was :J;~ld. by 'the. _ ., deceased th.at the ap1)ella.nt was one of -~hose who had a.tta.olted-h.er.._:_...,,. . . , I .. PW .3 with the assis·ta.noe of two other people carried thei deoeased home 'lrhere the deceased .repeated the dying decla_z:a.tion to her brother, . NOm:RT GABBIEL- {PW;5)·~ The next morii.Tug · s!J.~. was ta.ken tQ ~- d.isp~a:cy ·and va.s attended to by the Ru.t'al Medical Aid1 mu~ UGALAMBELA., (PW.-6), lihi~e there, she_ was seen by the Villa~e Chaiman, EDW.AlU> CmNGL...~, ,I (PW.it) and the the.J'l .Llo~ing Ward Secreta.ry1 SYLV.Al1US N~, (PW.8). . . ~ -~ i-·.., ·,.,., . .,,. •· '·, ~ .. "· .... 1 . .:, . ~-,f-·· ~ f"'•)..· ~· ._ir;;,,l'."Ttl / ,,... .,... ' I . ·,·; : +."· . ,. ' .. ,(}/ . ': ·, 2 ..,,,.. \ ' ·P . '" , Both of these ·testified to the dyil1g declaration. She died on -'i.h,e ., . (' '. •.(.1~~...- 7th March before she was· taken to the Government B:osp~tal in Ifa.4:ara. ...'..... . . '{'. ,)."" ·where she had been referred to. '"l···, . ' .. ·•- , •. ~~- The a.ppellan:ii was advocated for by 1m. B.AHTOBAKI, lea.med Counsel, ·"" ~~;~ ; and the Republio/Respohdent had.the services of MR. UDURI, lea.med :,► ,;i~ State Attorney. :;( •, I~ Mr. Banturaki had five grounds of appeal. Re abandoned the fifth •.,;{ ,•,,.•-,f c""~,,.. ground and argued 1;.b.e :remaining four as two grounds. First he said that the conviction was b~ed solely on t.:.ie dying'd.eola.ration without ;my ... ...,. ., ·'...~ .. , ,~ corroboration. Then he attacked the learned Magistrate for having 4 . \ · _'''' j -~ed the burden of proof onto the appella:.1t. . : (F"·.. ~ ~ . ~-' t-1 .A.a tor the ctl':ing declaration Mr. Bantu.raki subnitted tha.'t I ,J:,.,;.-• ~~, co.r.ro'boration was required a.s a matter of practice. He said tha.t \when '··-'~. ~-, . >. .. the deceased wa.s a-'.;taoked it was alreaey dark and so it was not 1 condlloive to proper identification. Mr. ICa.dll:ri replied that the . . .,--11'11 i -\· rep·eated mentioning of tb.e appellant as ·iile assailant to four different '\. ~.;: :•:A"•,• 1. . :~~,.s proseau.tion Witnesses suffice ·to allaJT any doubts of mis.ta.ken identity. .. ...;)-1:. ---- ---· .. :'•··.•'i.- •• ,;-;t: I" .; ;._ u and more s~ ~ the appellant was not a st_ra.nger to the deceased. In . . .: .. ., :! ' ' .. ....... a.ddition Mr. Kadur:L drew our at-'.;ention to the fact that -'uhe lea.med . ·: ' ' . 1Iagistrate adequately warned the assessors and himself of the· dangers .:, . .. '-' ~-· ~. ., :. .•. of· connoting on· an uncorroborated dying declaration. To this I>ir. Bantu.rald . - ,:.: reiterated. what had been_ submitted. before the lea.med Magistra.te. that ··..·.: / ~.; :: ,.;._ ·, ...... .. • ... J ,t,11•• ~- . z,epetitio?l does no·t prove the s-'i;atement to be true but is only evidence #• ..,. {, ··, ..... ...~, •. . . "'1,' '~~ - ...... of_ 0onsis.ten9y (Pius .. J ~ s/o 4,kuJnu v1 R, ( 1954) 21 I;lOA 331) • . • • J ..· ,,.,:. . ·- ( .·;' It i$ our well considered opinion tha·t the appeal stands. or falls ~ .... ,--:), . -:}: ...... - ,: ,.-,.·... ~ ~ the ismie of the dying declaration. So we.intend to dispose of that ·, rt-• } .. ~ . ,~ ·. .. 'Z.::: .:rra > . ·--::; ;:~i •· ,, -~~. •, ., ··'-'~- I .•• J3 -:~~iii · • ..(v'~~ . ··~,. "~- ... ,~., . / 4 {. the decision of the Court o~ t..ppeal for l;a.stem Afrioa in Pius Ja.:sww,a s/o AJ9mn¼ v 1 Rs repetition fis evidence of co11sis•i;enoy bu.t not a / I I· guarantee of accw.·a.cy. That case also decided that th01.18h corroboration is not a rule of law, it is nevertheless unsafe to base a. oon"\'iotion on an wcorrobora.ted d,y:i.llg declaration~ This Court was asked to find corroboration.in the evidence of . i.~~ -M.ill-•llJ ~·. the appellant himself. ITc admi·tted to have seen a. w.oman lying dow on the grass as he was retu.niing home t!lat eve11i..,g while three I.len, including BLASIUS C!i:IGUI.ffiI (PW ,,7) 3 were sta:.1cling beside her. But this, ,·;~· ' . -1~ f in our opinion, does not corroborate the.dying declaration tha.t it ,,t-~~~ -~ was the appellant who at·~a.cked the dGccasGd. On the contrary it Illc\Y give an explana;tion why ·tho deceased mentio11ed; him. The a.ppollant said I that he was asked by PW• 7 what his name ·--- .. - --- -----· was. a.1d that he gave it to him. ------- . '4 . Then he wa.s ordered to beat the wonum whom he could not identify" wt \;:~) ,. he rc;f'used a.,d ran a.was• i- i . :. •, ~is raises a. so:;:-ious douM in our m:inds whioh booomes even more I poignant and nagging w.b.011 not an iota of oviclcnce has been adduced to .~-~ suggest a motive for a. boy of 1iftecn to fa.telly attack a. divorced ,rcxnan and a mother of three children. We are not sc\Ying tha.t motive is nGoessar;y to prove a crime. -Ilowever, its establishment certainly olinohes snippets of evidence. should be sot- free is othorwiac la.mui. 1991 • ••••/5 . . . ... - 5 ··--,:;~r~ llilJ:/J,IE JUS~ICE OF AP~ l.. .s .L .R.tJ•IAIIWiI JUSTICE OF ~ D.,P. Ml..PI<WTO Ag• JUSTICE OF ~ a truo oopy oi. the original• JJ.J~. /.J-.-f ..J J 1 • ··{L-.B.· m.EGEYL.) SENIOR t.-. .· DEP"LJT'I ... , REGISTRJ;R ' . -. .. ,·. . I