19910812 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF T.1i.NZ,lNIA AT DAR B~ S,tL,I.1:.M.._ CRIMINAL A?PEAL NO! 155 OF 19S~ ORIGINAL CRIMINAL GhSE NO, 81J OF 19d9 OF THE- DISTRICT COURT 0F IL,iLii. DISTRICT ii.T KISUTU .3BFOfi.E MA.L'ITDJSi.'1 ...Iil\lI SHAB.ANI MT.iuiIB.AZI •••••• ·••• , ••••••••••• ~ • , •••• ·• ••., li.i?PELLJ~NT versus -THE...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19910812 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 12 August 1991
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF T.1i.NZ,lNIA AT DAR B~ S,tL,I.1:.M.._ CRIMINAL A?PEAL NO! 155 OF 19S~ ORIGINAL CRIMINAL GhSE NO, 81J OF 19d9 OF THE- DISTRICT COURT 0F IL,iLii. DISTRICT ii.T KISUTU .3BFOfi.E MA.L'ITDJSi.'1 ...Iil\lI SHAB.ANI MT.iuiIB.AZI •••••• ·••• , ••••••••••• ~ • , •••• ·• ••., li.i?PELLJ~NT versus -THE UNITED -RE.?UBLIC ............. ,, •••••••••••.•••• RES?ONDENT,, ~ ~ ; "JUDGMENT B4H.A'l'I, J.• , This is an appeal by Shabani Mtawbazi \:1ho was convicted of the offenee of robbery with violence under section 205 and 286 of the Penal Code and sentenced to a terw of idprisori~ent.for thirty ye~rs.· He is appealing· agairtst both,c0nviction and sentence4 The appellant 9 according to. the 'evLlence, was seen at the scene of o,riwe by PW2 and PW3 in coL1pany with other people. He was ar □ ed with a knife and he together with the others th~eatened ~o harQ the residents the house which they invaded. IIe robbed PW2 and ?W3 of a lot of goods, Then soon afte:·• that the appellant t::igether with the co-accased.\ were arree.t~~~'.'. - by the Police (j?W4) as they were in a landro,-er wi·t.h the i.tolen goods whi"-M · · :. . ·. ·' the cowplainant was able to identify. The appell mt even led the Poli•e to _.. /: where so~e of the stolen goods were. This. w..:,uld teni lo corroborate "ihe visual _ i~11Htifigatiof . soo s se ze on £he rom a~Re1iant1fl · e , ppe n twfrn!nd. PW3. There . was . . claim . no ,.. 1 wade oi:vthe his colleagues (c0-accuscd) by any cf thew. '?he. contention of the appellant in defence that he. was an .innoeeat·"$·.,.• pe,sserby canr:ot be true in view of the above cv.:..dence. The learned Magist~a··,e · was correct in rejecting this defence. The c:mv::.ction canno, be faulted therefore and it is uphel1. The appeal against conviction is disoissed. As for the sentence 1 it is the bare □ iniwu~ since this was arced robbery. Act no 1J of 1989 has amended the willi..JUiJ sentertoe ~or ar~ed robbery frow seven years .to thirty years ioprirJnGent. The appea:t is therefore dis1,dssed in its c n ~ i r e t y . · ~ ~ ; , ? .......,_ 1-it- BAILlTI .. JU . 12/0/91. Court Delivered in court Appellant present Miss l\umissi DAR ES ~i\.LM1M 12th August: 1991n •·