19920518 TZHC Dar es Salaam

.,.· ,., nr TITE ::IICI: CCTJ:dT m TAlJZANIA AT DAil ES SALAAM ------·---· -------- MISC. CRIHIHAL CAUSE lJO 'Z'f/1991 --~-~ In ·i;he rn1.ttcr of ai.--i application for Appeal 01..tt Of tiLlC ,-\ l..1 In tho uattcr -court of Il~la District at Ki.w2.coni. voicsu.s ... AlTTEJil PAUL 1-fulrISJI. , ••••••••••• ,ACCIJ'SZD nuLilTO ....,_,.__, ------ B/illATI, Ja, Tb.is is a:,.1 o;_)plication for aj_)pcline; out of tiac filed. by the Dircc·i;or of Public Proscou·!iions hcxcilUli'to::.· onllcc.l simply DPP. ·· ~ :'. ·4 Mr.., Mallalxi., loo.r11cd Sta:'lio Attorney subnittod tho:'li tho cosc involvocl iuo off once of oausinc; don:t.11 by t1..aneo:r:ous c.1ti villG in uhic:1 ~1c respondent wns o.cqui ttccljo ITo sro.c1 that jwlc;ncnt WM delivered on 8/3/90 lmt the . D?~") was cJWo:re of t1.1c-: decision on 23/7 /90 who~1 a rolo.tivo of iuo DPP a let-tor 1-t:liob. 1ra.s rcodvod 011. 23/7/90. ~10 doocoscd 1s r:elat:i.vo hir:tsclf r1asnoi avral'c of t.1e cou:rt 1s dccisio~-1 dcspi tc his coJ:Tespondcncc with tl10 llistr:ict CoW:t -:- roc.rucst:i11,3 for tb.e date of j~ent. Ho reply was c;ivcn to hia w1til 10/7/90. ih~c:i: t:10 wrote the DisJw:'iot Court osldnc to be suppl.icc.l with oop:i.cs of the procccuincs.. After !Jcttinc; the procccd.incrs the m'r f' ound that there wos nee cl to appon.l, ITo suboi ttocl thaJli t:1orr 1Ta'.3 cl{;l'OD."G 0J.1Dl'l00 of succoss, Tho prococdincs were rcceivccl on 25.5.91 n:.1cl ·:i·o nppool w~ loLll;cd on 25/7/91. In ropi.:r -'.;o that Mr Mbi.zyo.1 lc:--0.1;11cc.l coW1Scl for the rosporn .cnt opposocl 1 the application on tho C,"Iounc.ls thc;t tho of the jt:d{J.1011.t in July 1990 btrt his first lotter to the Distr:i ct Court 1TDJ3 not forthooninc till 10/8/90. IIo also quorriccl thn.t no loJliter fron tho docc~od' s rol::1-tivo wna n.tto..chotl.~ ITc soi.cl further tb.aJ~ ii the );~l-' cot copies of' ·l.:.10 prccccclinc,-s on 25/5/91 1JU.·t filccl tho opplico.tion on 25/7/91 tho npplicn;Hon was filed out cf tL1c ins"'.:;oo,cl of tho 45 clnys prO'\Ticlcd for under section 371 of the Ori:r:iinal. Pr:occdurc i1.ct. IIo wont on to state that unc.1.cr o, 379 of tho Criminal. Proooduro Ao·:; it is nan:1n.fory to Givc notice hu:li there wu13 110 notice Givcn. - 2 ... In a iV.l:'vhor roply 1'-'lr. Mnlla1)a snicl that section 379 lt.ns oor.!pliod •-~ ~ ~ith 1)cct>.USc on 10/8/90 tltc .D:is·b:dc·~ Mn{;isi;ratc was i11i'ort.1ccl that tho •.l)iJi~· ·.:. . :·. --· .._;_~- .i wru1·boc1 to o.ppocll.. Ile aaic.l. thc.1:t there was no noocl to iilc ru-w iottcrs M ·ru.ma::t-urcs beco.usc thoro w~ no 00W1tora.fficlri:vit to disprovo.~at# It is tloo.r tron what hM lJoon subr:d. ttcd th~t ·tho .......... .. .. ll'l' too!: 2 months fror.1 t.~..o ~;J.O he c;ot probQoc1iltr;'8 to f'ilo tho application and intended tlppoal. lfo reason has boon Q.C.lvtU1oacl f o't' this dcley. Al.so, £:,'OillC thxoU('.,h tho rooo:rd1 I c1o not, with a-ospoct, acroo wiJli:l Mr. Moilaba that there arc croat ohru-.uwos of SUCCQBS 'ill -'i;;.iis DPP~~. L~i.ij,, this case 1-1a1:1 cl.ooidod in 1990 a.11.d to-:-c.iav it is 1992, I t1o not ri.hcl it in · tho int~oaJ.; at _justioc to have the natw r ~ llCriilt. In viaw of tho o.bovo tb.o oa:>Plioation is <li.ar.Jias·cd. JUDGE 1n,5.92 Dolivcroc1 i.11 Oourt an 18/5/92. Rcsponclcnt in porson · Mr. Mifoncolc fol' c.ppollant. . _........'.,,.,, ... ··· ····-. JUDGE DAR ES SAL.illJI 18Tl! MAY 1992,