19931203 TZHC Dar es Salaam

.. ' L \E, KM-=.} , t\-\C\.t\- ~ qo !2J~ -~- · ~. !y{ S ~L~ '~ri · J.-1. ~...,, ~ _J...J...1: ";t"l, .:,..~ c:, · T · • ?,f I )......J.J.L,--L•l ,.. ••• t .. t.- . lN'1.:.11!.,:_:51 - • ' . ' rc:;_·;:..1 lL'...?JC ':1 n; "; I!:JS'l'ITIL'JJ :::F .,,., ; ' "' . . . .• : • &,, i:,;JJZtJ:JL"-• 0 o :> > • ~ ~ if, c ., .,1 o o '.o o o o o .P~~·TJ1i1F \. 't·, . .., _, ~, 4. ~·, : ~,·. i t- 4i•! -rorom - ~ K.,.'u'~ ~:].L~.::.. lLJIG:Ia. i: 3 OTlt::aS •••• D..7Jill'J)1JTT ' .. • t ' "'" .... In this suit -t:10 plaj 1:.tiff is· ~lai::-tl.ng da.'Ja.GGS fjr t:..-ospas.s t• goods . as well an Ul;llc;;;rt'ul terminc.tion o:f accn«'y against fJ'.'Om ~f.endants ('Ut rf· 1r!1ich·, r..:1.y the f,,:ur-wh daf'en&:nt ·:ls :t-es.id•nt 'in t-Tanzania with· a r'lgistcrc-:l_ ~.,ffJ.co in the city of Dar es Salo.am. The: other tllrci'3 02"} rcsi<":.ont in Garmany with n<> local ad.dress for scrv-ico.' Inc: plo.int alloffOS, inter o,lia, that the dcfonibn-.111 ' 11wi thout a:.1y la1~:·u1 right a.ctod .naliciously• -~it.,~tl:,r Jc a.l1d in COl'J;SJ;)irc.ncy•• • • 11 ~ F•lJhwi.ri..g' tht filii-ig ·uf -';ho· sui't. nornhl· ~ervicfo ..~ , · been effeotcd. -;-:1 tho fou:dh ~.dondo.nt= who hn.s .a. l'•_cal 'nd.ru:-,ss and . '' the' J:lla:L;.1tiff hns il1f,irtcd the· ccurt that persanaJ::s$rrlc~ hb.s· boon J. ♦ • ... · bffoe'ted on t!J.3 ~ther three defeni.tu11S by the pld:intiff hinself. The pln.intif:f; tl1ort:'lfor9 p:ra.,vs fur hearing of tho suit. Mr. hatiru, a , ~ . '. ' . ') ... managing Pn..rtntr c:f th6 J;>lo.in-ti+-:!:', hns appor..rel f~r· thG-· plaintiff whilc''M:r, Uzaii.du, :1Qn:rnec. ad.v0·1,ate, - ht.B a:ppcQ.l'ed :for the fourth fle:f end.ant• I~ t,_:dposinc th~ Dlaintiff 1 s appli~::i,tion f~r hcnrin(; •f th. -suit Mr. Uz,mta hc..s . rd.sod two main :ricin-'.)s.. 1 1 ?.:.:e first poin-. relo.tes to • . service •f the fi:i..~st three defcmr_ants., Ifo submii,tod that as tho • . _. ' ) . :a:· -~ . l)la.intiff h.n.s failod t-:, comply with. tho provisions o~ &V r 32 •f 'iihe li , f ( ~. i . ' ''f . . . g , . ;-fivil ~ '. l C"dc ;t tho -, ~' three, , aef cna.o.nts h2,ve ; . law btl~n n:it in . . serv•El .. ~ B.l!l.d. si_nce the Pfti.:Lntµ":C'# nllcgos consRir~cy runo~ th~ four a_ef.nd.a.nts t).o su.i i canntt P:t;.'J:&oo4. wi th:)Ut t~1e o_th<F dof onda.n:,p O.?-DG. .servod. ". , .· • • · II · t •• .A.s.rtgarts . tho, al.l~God so~ico by the plcintiff hii,15elf ?,Ir. Uzand.a • , '' ., . f • • •• itu~ittet that_ it Y_Df .m~e wi,t?~:1.t,, ~ orde; of the ceurt and t:i.rc is ~ f t . f',.J.luro, t1" 9o~ly ui~h. :tJ;o ?;ovisj•ns •f ~Vr'3t ._~ t:-. ...vi) ~l.l:t'fi c~~C• ~ Ur. :UzOfi.a b~. p:>~te'f. tt;t that n•. cVi«.en,.J ~lc.dgorn.ent fr-.:i the «.ofendo.nts ~o.s ,b0en ~ i . . , . n._.orl~i~~ .f (.. • _:\ J, '. , ., 'II f \:0 -~ :f:fi~ ,e;" ~~G <.')~- ~ - WGU: ,~aa. as ro\uir-0d.. .. .• /2- '. it .. 'I, I, < ~ . ~ ,, -~ ' . J . 2 In the d --i,errn::;tiv-· I-Ir. Uzanda has subni tted that if the ceu;;:-t t ~ that the first tltroo dofenda.Dis havo been served than the ceux,·f:; ~h•uld --g_j;veThe ... thom cd.oqu.a--iJo iiDe file t:10ir iefonces. t:. second c;round :roliod n 1·y Mr. Uzo.ndc, is that the plaint· is bad in fern .::;.'1.d nu.st 00 rr,jqcter. as it offonds t110 pre:v:isi•ns ef section 44 (2) cf tho 1..dv(. .. u:~os Jr•Unc.."1co in that it docs not boar oxry endors~mcnt .~:11. .:"..:-.c; wlir prep.::..ror7.. it., Hr Uzc:..11do. suomi{ted the,t a 0 d.ec1.Ullent whio:.1 shopJ.d n:-,t hz,vo been dcccpted by 2 rogistry e:fficor o.:1n11ot lJe r0c2.:edod c:.s hein/· properly boforo the court. Ile·· cited the cnse of .I:Iii.JI :;:-,ru:.:=n:1 lli:.JI A '::J,f V ISM:',7'.L ~ill1IIl!KIL.'JJ ( Tunr<...nyika Law Reports Vol I PG 5G5 at pg 597) ns authority for this. pr•pes;iti•n• In that case a written statoIJ.an-t cf rlefence was accepted by tho rog.istry eut of time m1d )Tilson J,., hdf that the sam~ wus net .properly beferc tho court and rojcotod it,. In the present oc..se, Mr. Uzanda submi tt<2ld., / I there is a spocifi:: prr,hibiti~-n in sostion 44 of the MvQcates - ~ e e n»t acoept c1 doou,-.iont which ~.oes not 'be~ a:..,.y su.cl1 -endu'senont. I think tho:co is forl")o in tllis arkumont. S 0 cti~n 44 •f the .Ad.vecates· . .-rdinancn proVidos o.,s f d lcw: ~-' '. n 44-( i) 3..rory person whe draws ~r prepares any inst:rom.:nt as is raention¢d in the preceilng section· wrha.11 end•l"se er oa:usa to be e:nd~rs od there,m his llaJJo· o.nd ad.dress; and nrry such r-orson onittinG' so tc- io ro f.:ltioly enter.:ing- er •.rosing te be cndG.rsod a.'1y of 'the said r0q_tiixera()nt8 shall be- liable·: en· . convi.ctbn by a Jis-;;:r_j_ct court to a. fino not exceeding .twe hund:.•od saill.i.ri..gs. (2) It sball not :>e lawful f<.::.' ~ - registering authority te accept ''I' I'G;~{' ,~•1iz,a any instrunont unless it purperts t. °bGar t:10 n.:IJO ~f the person who prop2X0d ,: . it _cne..orsed t!l~oon. 11 I respectfully (k.'7'I'OG ,with Mr., Tizanrla that as the lmr nak0s, the failure to 001rply witl1 SC'Oticn 44 ( 1) 0f th~ J.ivgoates Grdina.nee a crime puni.shn.Jlo 1rith a fine ·a more strict futeri,rotatien is te be givon to socticn 44 n.ni ,.n -tho· authority of the IUJI IURAIDJ\{ case reforrod to 2,br,v~ thQ :pla:i,;p.t must· be ·rejectctj.~ I raject !11r. Iln:Hbu. 1 s argument thd s ,-:,ct ir~n )-4 a1)JJ.ies enly tb o.tv~,,cat:es a.nci that as he is . I ~tldarrt. Delivered in Tieoember 1993 in 3rd clay <:,f ,) Mr. Uz.Mf.rti. fo1• t~10 4th defendant I t,, 1 1 ,r:,1 Plaintiff nbsr;nt. J, ,·· l, Jl ti 11 .~ T • L. HICTEIJ I! . JUDGE ,1 iu•l ;.: }.12.93 I •.if:i . ti I ,I ,i \1 I ii ' CIIIB.T IlTI 1'C:..T 'l:u:IS IS A 'I3.U:.J - COPY ,1 1: 't f / / /