fadhil mohamed vs shabani unami 1994 tzhc 415 4 february 1994
PC, CIVIL J-.P. 33/19G0 lYJDZILI MOIIAIEIDI*. . . . . .IPPSEJUOT? YjiESUG f?-Tff;'3TT TETiKI............ » . 333SP01HELW J S D G 1 U 3 IT T This appeal ro tten to a piooe of lan d whioh. has "been a mtb-jeot «e -two c i v i l oases tf-daL deoided \rj tho ICEtoi'a PriHiary Court in Kr-lom'bero D is tr io t. Blxe one...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- fadhil mohamed vs shabani unami 1994 tzhc 415 4 february 1994
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 February 1994
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
PC, CIVIL J-.P. 33/19G0 lYJDZILI MOIIAIEIDI*. . . . . .IPPSEJUOT? YjiESUG f?-Tff;'3TT TETiKI............ » . 333SP01HELW J S D G 1 U 3 IT T This appeal ro tten to a piooe of lan d whioh. has "been a mtb-jeot «e -two c i v i l oases tf-daL deoided \rj tho ICEtoi'a PriHiary Court in Kr-lom'bero D is tr io t. Blxe one i s C iv il Cose Ha. 77 of 1901 -which i s re fe rre d to in p assin g "by the learn ed a p p e lla te M a g istrate, end th e o tl.er i s Q iv il oaso 33o* 14 of 1986 yhxaih i s the su b je ct of th in appeal* Ehrecits uiaoih. le d to t h is appeal ocn o n ly 1)0 put in to olocr forous ttfter fondiJag out what was adjudioated •upon In ' . the e a r li e r s u it* In tho Xfckura C iv il Case W0. 77 of W Aflh& Logchalijm sued liohaiaed s a id K ilcopckiirili on tho seotmd th a t th e defendant had onnhoachod on tho p la i n t if f s p iece of len d . She sued *0 reoovor th a t lan d and fo r w npensation fo r inro oooonut tr e e s which wero f o ile d h y the defendant. Her aotion suooooded in a tmanimous judoQcmt of tho t r i a l prim ary Court. I’J hilo considering the appeal in rospeot y£ the Ifalcara Prim ary Court Ci-yll oaso ITo. 14 of I 98S tho loam od D istrio t M agistrate ohsorvod th a t tho p l a i n t i f f tho ro ?tlio la t e Asha, Xdsohaliniaj was ShcJboni Unoinxs p a te rn a l aun t. Shahcni U nm i i s tho respondent in t h is ap p eal. I t was algo in ovidenoo th a t tho defendant In c i v i l oaso lTo» 77 of 1981 "was in no way ro la to d to the l i t i g a n t s in th e prosont appoal. 2 On tho pilior Iona, there m e ovidenoo th at too 3aid mrf* Shaiiba w * tho property i f ono t e i mmotrnu the i„i sa id leftn o issue WTVlTtaG h i* , t a t Doforo fe, died Anzi bequeathed tho s u it p lo t to Asha U s o h a lim lAo « * M s s t o m a l ra n t. I t ^ « 0 court, ^ c a lle d KO„ svidenoo ” l a *” e t0 * ° ' ? » oolosio=-l enflw of tho l i t i ^ i t a , tlrn-t tlT.0 respondent fa th e r oad A n si's fa th e r „oro brothers, I t is now 0U ° f 1 te ‘ * “ 000,0 °f aotion * » <w*«fa«a «& * 10 teNA on the re la tio n sh ip lw h w a, tho respondent and tho la t e t o r t „ho tho l i t e r ' s p atern al Imolo. looked a t fron m other anslo, tho th ru st * * * aPP0Di Sof° - * • “ - w Court W . power to devise tho s u it land to is!,-,, h is m t a a a l aunt. She appellant i s iish a lig o h o lim u ’ s grabdson* I t i s VQ0 .^euod M o r e tho lo a n o d ap p ellate D istrio t M agistrate " 00#ort“ 6 *> « » Atogoxo t e t l a l o w * * , , * , rfiicb tho lit ig a n t s ^oolong, a maternal n ep lw has no r i cht to in h e rit r e a l property t«m C r T V ""* ^ * “* • i s l a t . tho a p p e llan t's mother Erie *****49 « • * « t e t o r t had bequeathed of the Local O u s t e d I™ B u lo 'jq Eulo X On’■ 4 3 ' °f 1?63 dSfeata t :‘0 “W y a n t 's olalm. 49 provadoss— Tho sa id "IkiTra. h a t e , baba au shar,jOTi v a r i e d ndugix vengtae wa fcuKmoni*Tl E T C octually t h i s Eulo k i l l s a woman's - i r h t to bominH- i ttT -i-? i -» t , " ^ ooquGcviJn re a l px^oportv imxola bole age to lior to IiGr cwn W m n- +n o-l to caiy* otner person s ^ ig o r d e r s worthy « W iif a g hor e s ta te , * CKst TZZTTT S o c i e t a l needs i t i s intended -ondor l t o ’ • °J * “ ** t0da;’ ilGaoteiaatoE' against anyone m p o lio - t r ^ l 0 t ° 01,4 * <®a3nait to ^ p o lic y . I t i s puhli o 1 Pa0pl° “ • OWWl »X»t<eo the lair ,* ia h , fa ^ ^ ^ aHo „ ta . T a o. u T s ta , ^ " to ^ G C t ah w - 0110,3 to ^ « , t s u s e l e s s and ^ t , thor.Toro, ho d ia o a ^ d . Blo i t o ^ Sh ifth " T ^ th° 't° 'b°TOat:i I,or to whoever she cihose G ^°^ofbro pcssod good -fcitlo to ^n-dlinli M 7 ^ # -ho hoquoathod tho s u it porool « 1 ^ to h i l T ^ " ^ * . ^i st troioot V<fc«t C M sot T asides 1 10 the ^ ° "dudgnent roi- B“ of^ the t r i a l~ w h ™ , - alh o lt upon d i f f e r ^ oonslderatlons, i s resto red m ^ S h a ll ho read to the p a r tie s hy tho a ^ J o oa 4 f c * * ■ " “ * jkt-JS maCAWJA / •Vs JUDGE L / It f c S ^ y f e o ^ r * 0-* ® -fcpouajrt. in ji^ iU p p G lla ir t f g Eoprosojxtn-feirol 4- 2- 1994-