salesi wambula vs mathew nakapete 1994 tzhc 406 10 november 1994

a_ u u .'. -i-n . A*i' •Gii. C A XGx j.. i J j JL* cI u ±j IC j.!IC i-. (Kbeyc u e ^ ir t r y ) (PC) CIVIL APP3.,L JO. 55 Of 1994 (:-ioui th e d e c is io n oi tl.e d i s t r i c t Court o f 3/wanga at biiubaw.-ngc i*i. C i v i l >.ppe6l l o . 50 o f lSi>3) At'?3LLA::x‘ Vex si‘.3 t i.J * 1— J I i* a c a s o a a r 3 . -j - a c c c 3 0 c ^ ' S ^ a O P o o X l U o I ' O x 'd j - h i . ' * X" j ii a m :r t MWIP0P0, J . % A ft ex Oo iiib through the p r o c e e d in g he^ri^g t i e p a r tie s on appeal I have no wouht in ay rai^u that the 1st -.ppeliate *s C ou rt's d e c is io n was erroneous because PV.2 dich not est^ .jlish that he hod ohe a u th ority fo s e l l the leijjc; in dispute and L..at the d e c is io n o f tne t r i a l cou rt was the c o r r e c t one. I th e re fo re allow ohis •.•p^eul with c o s t s . In a way the respondent Methen ha... pete w i l l s u fie r as a r e s u lt o f th is l- l. j. Ju- d e c is io n rh ich issu e v a s^ a e li’oer^te~ upon by the t r i - 1 c o u r t » Ihe respondent produced enough evidence as s u p p o r t b j .,'•7,2 - Simon 'j?a...ba that he paid Shs.5>0CKy= to the s.x e D'J»2 - Siaon ft aha as purchc.se p rice fox the p o rtio n , , - •• -j l?y,the a'O’aellcjnts 1 nd , . - .. , o f lusnd T), .ic.a wts ooapleuely svsrro- aide^as ..ex su.e\;cn nwp o'_ the land in d ispute ihtfl.i by the Pri;iary ^ourt? ‘..'...e sjute Jv.r„2 ^.i^. not show any power o f attorn ey to s . l e the land in dispute froiti h is hu^ubtino : robe whoa he purported to he the tx .e owner of \jhe Lt.-:d in. dispute^ nor did the defendant o . l l tha sjna Augustino to c c i s t e s c i - y to je uhe ovner o f th e liiKi in c isp u te . nd t o 1. ve authorised 7 .2 to s. le it fox hia* T h erefore, sin ce c .is cou rt hcs fov__ t the l~;nu iu i&cuo belonged to the a p p e ll.n t i s only f - i x fox t_.j reaponaent to h 've tha a s s is t nee ^ f iwiis ^pttCu/resiit'v.tin; the purchase p x icc acs p iid oo .. . I t ig / O therefore oxtered tlu t t ie JL.g.^>s0 0 0 /- p u i- by the res tom-ent II.:thew / ’ > / Hdfcspete to hfaoA j.‘aaba shall b.' refused to hi., by uhe s. ae Jiaon faaba# ti -f* i! IIJ..V c XI V. I1 V \ ^ " // V- ^\ / - y h .L ,L . ’ M’TIFOF'O Vv>x At'-SumbUwi;ng^ /J \ * ' S ' JohGj-l \ vi o •n t h ^ c ' iiSV s# ^