19941201 TZHC Dar es Salaam
I ------. ... TEE Dllt:'..J@ Il.If:¼13LIC OF TAN'Zlil!+A nr cir~ lTIGII COT.TRT OF TANZWA ------- AT DAR ES stu.Ju\M • • • • • -- • • • • ¥ • • • • • • PL,O.DJTlF.D" versus R U T:, I N a In this oasc -:::.,o k'.7to!'nay Genc:ra.1 b.2.s been served w:i.th a. Third:, P~tr lfotioo ac a r:-:rtt lic:blo to i11denmL-Py...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19941201 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 December 1994
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
I ------. ... TEE Dllt:'..J@ Il.If:¼13LIC OF TAN'Zlil!+A nr cir~ lTIGII COT.TRT OF TANZWA ------- AT DAR ES stu.Ju\M • • • • • -- • • • • ¥ • • • • • • PL,O.DJTlF.D" versus R U T:, I N a In this oasc -:::.,o k'.7to!'nay Genc:ra.1 b.2.s been served w:i.th a. Third:, P~tr lfotioo ac a r:-:rtt lic:blo to i11denmL-Py tho 2nd Def~ndant1 the Bat:lonal Dank of C!c,:.;·.,:::roc, for oL::.L':l.cd d~os DJld o.Qsts in a suit :Lnstitu:hGd agah:s.t :.-t joi:1t:.:.y -:-iitl~ Ta.11zD.nia Sisal Au.tllo:t:ity, the 1st l)efond.rol·i;, £or failv.xo to c,1:ant vnoo.nt posacssioi1 to ·t.10 Plaintiff' of. --~ I.and- puro:1asod fi'om ·tho 2nd Defcnd.ent, on oocount of allogod -wrongful; .r.evooat:i.on 0£ a RigM; of Oocupa.noy by the Prcsid01t"'41 of the United llA)pub~o of Tanzania, in rcspoot of suoh land, lt.l.ioh ha.d been laro:~ 'fm~d by tho 2nd Defendant to the Plaintiff, E1£Unji L ~ Limited, upon SUQh salo .. In hie Written st~tooont of DcfGnoc, tho A.t~rnoy Gcmar:al hae- n.istd a prclimina:ry point 1ilicll Mr• Malaba1 loaT1tcd State Attorney, en 'bcll.a1f of the Atto:rnay Gcnoral1 has ~guod boto:r:o tllis oourt. In the :f:i:ret plaoc, it :1as been oonte.nted t!la~ tho Third Pa.l!'l;y Notioc acrvc<l upon t:J.G A:tio:cllOy Gener.al has no"i; oompUad with the . p,:ovisions of 0,1 R._1,i"..t~ of the c.P.ct, ~iah :rt~os ~t tho Noti,Go a.1ould state .219£!.1:l t:io nc.~c of the plaintiff' a oaac ~ainst the Dotc;ul..:l'-t(s), it 1)Ci11.[;· n:r.:;uccl ".;l-:r;~ thG Notice ccl'V-cd upon tho A.G;. . . '..... . doos not S?._onoisc\y o:r ::£."'.22..i.sc1y a·~;~d;c the pl~1.ii:2:t' ::i oasc ~ainrl tho Dot.c1ula11ts, and, ::.11 j_)1:.:r·~io:.1ltcc the 2r}.d DGfcndan·~, suf"2ioicntcy to G%l,a.blo ·foe A. a. l.'Gply -~o ~1::.0:1 lfoticc. _ &0011.d.J.y, it l:as boon oontGnc1.ccl by Ml:, I:Ie.lcba t:·,;:i.t uhilo it is tho ;r.c<J.'l,1-irc.mcnt undor 9~.ifa.~ 12,W o:f tho 'C.P.C. ·:.:1a·~ t:'.10 third pnrty lfoti.Oc should state also -~ho Dcfcmdat1t' s a~'\im ~?t\inst ·i;J.10 'lhird Ptll.'ty1 that hM not boon done in -'.;ha ineta1.1t oaso. • - 2 - . . lfotiQo in c:J.so supposod ·\Jo adnhlish tho conneotion bo-bweon tho Pl.a.in.tiff's Q.J.$ ~ainst suoh Dci'1mdro1t ancl ·the 2nd &f'ond.o~xt• s o1a.i.Dl against t.."rio · ~- ~il:d fozty vzhich to ::~1, lin.cl not been mnd.o out Ol(i~ 1n thG ~ d P~ty lfo•:;ioo eorvcd upon ,.,~-~G A.G. 011 tho point ~io · GQUt't ha.a bocn J:afo:;red to tho 0?460 o:£ Sl.v~e.op,g·:~~2t1w Co.,_ (Rood. S.04"rl.ooo) t'Od.. Vs Afl'iosi ii£~P-~. A«9nt;l (j~). Ji.t~ ,W62) !,At, ,19q~ It hns th.on been l:'ij;'030d by Mr. li.'\l.aba ~.ia.t -'lili<:: ~lit'd fczty Not~G shoul.d be dismiseed wi:fo Qosts. Iil hi.8 rep~, l<~~ ~olo, loat"nod counsel £or. ~o 2nd. Dotondant hM t.WG'U,Od. tha.t tho objoQtions raised by tho A,G. -~ yonooived and t4orcZoro oon~lu. IIa h~G oontond.Gd that all -w.i~t is :i:oqtliJ:Gd ~ the O"i°tCld ord.Gr: o:t tho C,.P.c. is for tho 'Ih~d-l'~"q lTotioo to eta.to tho natttto of tho olo.ima by tho pa:r.tioo in t.'lc mu.t_ ai1d tho r.eliofe tlh~ o~ on~ cl.ai.mt3 1 ~ l i i t.1ta.t tho m=ds ~oo1sol3' or "oonoieo~ u.~d by t:10 loarn~d st~.;o At·~o:r:ncy woro not applioablo to S•1..&1'ii bGOe.t.tat t;J.<; ~~ ~'tr Uotigo doQs not have to ~cpi:odt.100 l-41a.t is ~ the p1l1.i,i\11 neither· ie :I/ii ,:<oqi.,til'Qd. to rox:q:od~o li1a·~ is in the ~ttGn Sto.tc:m1ont of Dotc1100 1 it being tho dtt'liy of t;.io 'l!lud. fartv" 1o look tor and obtain oopics o:? plaint O,t'ld 'tft!itton &t;n:lioaont of Doto%10o ~ order to have l)l'coien fnots to enable him to _tile o.-1 ~o:ttt'i• det.c1100, Ji?,:·• l~ol.o hn,e it-c:·~hcr nxgncd tho.;c J29::t:'.Liu .Cf! tho ~ird P~ty Rot~G l~iofa t11;0 Plaint~"'Zi :3 ol~im against th<J ])c:tondant{e) join~ 81\d the roliei'e claimed by the PJ.aintif:f'1 the-roby a..'\t.~ tho ~-Gqw.tG!lan.t,i unilc:x: ~ (~'J.5. ,W of the C.,P.a,. Likov.i.so, ho has. olao aontondcd that - ~ of tho •~il.'d Pc:o:v Notioo <EtI>l.aille tho ~ l\<it~nd.P,nt 1 e olai.m 8€$8"..__-~:i.o A.G. 1 1iuDh 1s imemni.,iW and. that tho A, a:. 1 a aote tdiioh giJn oaus ~ ~tion to tho . . 2nd Defendant- have:; boon. iltd:i.oatcd thoroin, thGX'cb:r s.X-dqfying the J<G(l'liroaonts 'J! £J-Liilbl of tho c.P.c. Ao ~g~ .the ..GhiJ:d PO-int of tho objGotion, 5.t ~M boen oonton.4ed by tho ~oDnG<l oounsol for -~he ~ Defcndent 1 th~·& in ~L(g), of th.a Tlu.:i:d Fc4W Notioc, JlillCi :ccliofe oL.'"limod by tho ~l't l)ot4214a.nt against th.o A. G♦- h4!1G beon s-tntGd1 bointr ind.<imhity by tho A.G. to tho 2nd. llofcndi.\nt of tho a~t• alaiL1 ~ainst tb.e 2nd. Dcfondant ~d. ooats ot; i, 'tho suit, so that the, 1'0(!l1.U'Cr:tOnt of 0,.1 R.1i:,W oz t11.o c.• P.o .. ha-vu also beon ful.17 aompliod uH:i. At! ~cgnrda tho atrii~.lo~i·~y of tho Ugonclan oaac of ·ovarsoae T;=inG Co, (no·nc1 (&nio.os) M;cl.. o.itcd by the lo~ned S·~t\"~c Attorney, it 19' tho &WJniissi.on by ooui1sol tor the 2nd DcfGnd.ont ~1ct tho oasc hae no %.t!l(;Vo.nc)O. to the frotr.i oi' -~1is on.so, in that Jlihc ism.'l.o thGl'c was ltlot11~ '. , .11111111 ·- 3 a.t the olosure of the Plailr'viff'' s oase the evidenoe 0~1 .recOTd was suoh that -'~e iilii:rd p ~ had any oase to ~ewer.. I-'.; _l1as ftll'ther boon a.t'~d ·on this point tlta.t if ·l.!.10 A. a. had found the tota.li·!;y of the claim and . ~-elief'_s stated in the i:B.1:ird Party Notice to be inadequate rmich ho1~sr, is OQnsid.Grcd by the le_a=cnad counsel to be not. tllo oaso, then he should hc:Wo a,pplied. for ~tl~.c:r- and bet-'.;or· particulars of ,.,lilie claim. ~.,~ 11aa been finally sub.1115:ttod for the 2nd Dofcnd.c.·v:l"', ·tha.t einoe tho 'lhi;d P~ty has not filccl a defence to the Pla.ilT~l.:l.'>fi a olaim as requhted ...... undfll'•9,.,_,1,·RelZ of tho C,P,C., then he is to be tal:c11 to have admit-'.;od the claim~ a.nd tho:refo:rc ;juc![;ncnt should be entered tor the 2nd. Dofcmdant in aaoo:rdcinoo with the provi:ti.011s of Q..,,1 R~ 19{ 1){.§2, of t:ie C,P aC •, fo1' tho :ttel.iofs pt'ai;red by the 2r:.d Dc:.?c:.:u.r,rr'G ns well as 12.to Plain·~i£f'1 and tha.t tho prolimi11ary obJoo·~io:10 by tho Third Party sh.ottld be dismissed rd.th costs. Ih l'Oply, l'fr. I::-.l2~J2. for t:.10 A.G. has maintai11od that the words unde:r -.Q.,~1.·A~l?(a~· ~~.tL1tl o1 ·~hs c.P.c. cannot 1)c c;ivc11 wy other meaniJls than. tho nature of -t:,.c· f'no·~s to 'bo stated dlould bo ·which a:t'o snough or suffioiont to on..."1.blG -'~:.,.o 1l1l1:i.rct Pa:rty to reply to tho ol.aim by eithor admi t-'li~\! or doeyil1g o:r pn.r.,i;ly a.drlli tting or pa;rtzy dc11Yingj llddil:ig that . . . liha.t. 1'1e . Thi:rd Pn:rty is m.tpposod to do aftcr· roooi'V~ . . Tb.:ir.d Party Notice is to mal~G a rapl,y to au.ch Third Por.ty NoticoJ ·!~o lias no dllty ·l;o soa1;0h fo'l: tho plaint or i'rittcm Statement of Defence, so tha,-'ii tho Third P;:,;rty lfo-'li1oo in qUGstion did no·~ moet such test. On the oa.sc oi-'iiod Mr, J:fulaba has maintained ·~ha-'i. · though learned counsel for tho 2nd Dofc11d..1n-'.; sought to distil'lguiall i t 1 -'.;he case fits exao-'.;:cy in the r:.rgwncn-'.; uo :1ad ad.Vroiocd, oontendillC' ·b!lat tho Principlo la.id by su.oh caso boillG .,li~.1n·~ for thG Third Party -'i;o bo hold liable fu.Gl!e should be ost.J.blishGd 0011ncotio11 between tho Pla:iJ1·~itf 1 s claim against . . the Do:toadant and the Dofcmdn.nt' s claim against -'lt10 Third Party; which the Th:ixd Pa:rt;y lfotioo ia quo i:rcio11 had not even a·acmp"ued · to do. It is ru::o the ['.J'.'fst'.f.lc11t of lii:r" Malabn. il1 rcpl,7 Jchn;I; while appli- cation for i'ur·~1or nncl bo·~-'.;cr pC'.J.'-'.;:Lcula:rs, ic for non-:-mibetantivc issuos, :f.ailt1l'o ·~o di:'::closo -'Ghr. nL':~·-'.l'o of t).~c claim is tonto.r,1<JJ.11t to fnilu:ro to disclose; a ODUsc of notion and fnilv.rc, to disoloac onusc of notion has a.lweys been good rcmso11 :?or dismissal of plcr.di11Gs1 F;i..'llally 011 the )?l'c\Yor for. tl1c 2nd Defond..--.nt -'ii~.1a:'.; upon failure of tl10 !Ih~d. PoJ:"vY to file 1fdJ.;tc11 Sta.tomont of Dcfenoo, · judJLcnt should be entGl'od ':tor the 2nd Def c11du.1.1·h, is tho eubmisaim1 of· Lt, Malaba. that suoh lfr:itt·ei1. ~a.tomont of Dofo1100 hod alrGady boon filcd.t and I think he is :igh.t. . 011 iihie, ' , - . 4 llaving hoard roµro0cn 1~nti.ons c..s a.dva.nood 011 6ot.h sides, this OOttt'-tr s journo;r i11. sca.-rch of jt-i.s<::~oG mu.st, of naoosei-'liy s-'v1:1Xt 1-rith the a::mmi11a-'don of tllc l'clovant provisionu of the C.P.c. In tho first plapo ,tr:. start with tho. provisions oi' .o,,1 ~ tha relevant p~aguaph~ for 0-.. oaso,. being parns .(~)0~)_:_~~ci. Col~ Tllcsc 1 : .- I p:ttocood to qUOtc in -~cnso, thoy provide thus: ~1l_s 15 ~ l}vozy third party notioo shall stf.l,tc - - (o.) t:1.c no.tl.u'c of the plai.lr~i.ff 1 a oasc ~ - tho d.GfondantJ (1,} t::i.o no.-mo of tho d.ofcnda,rtli1 s claim _ Dgm.nst tho Third. PaTtyJ {o) _f t1).o z-c lief e claimed by . lc d.o:cclld.a.nt agailts·h tho Third Pa.1:ty1"' At t!tia junctui:o le·~· it bG pointed out th,d; o. Z1ird Pnrty lfotioc is for: all pr:aotioal pu:rposca1 a form of a. olo.im by the d.ci'ondant institutod tho snma aga:i.nst tho t::..ucl party, for tho ~oliofs _oot'!G'ht. As tho d.Gfcmd.wi;t a Qla.:w. ~ro.nsii t.lio 'ntl:rc: P~·hy lir.l@)s on. the na·h:ira oi' tho claim of -'liho plaintiff ogainst the c1ci'c:1cbnt, it is, for u fo.:i.r and just adjudie.a-'don of . . tha dispti.-'tio impc:rn.tivo ·r12.-'li ·the third paTty should ho suppliad with sufii- . o:i,ont fao-ts as to mal:o I1im ln10w adequately tho 1w:~i~o of the claim D.S -'oo bG in a position to propn'.t'q a J.):t'opor Md Gd.oqu..:d;o dcfonoo, Tho nocd for euoh sui'1ioio:it i'aPts ·fo Gnnblo -'i;ho third party idont:u."y tJ.1c 110.:tu:rc of tho alaia oamos to tho fore 'l·dlan ono roads R.ulo_u of .9.t..1. of the c.P.C, that lh.ilc p:t'ovidcs ro'ld I qL'lOtot tlffllo.:ro a t:.d.:rd pal'ty notice has been acrvad on tho third p~-'~ tho third party ahaU,· .M: ¥ wisho::, to . . . . ... . !q .,c\i~t.~.<GJlo. pj,antifft e claim l.ll;~!:.o__.~i;:~ §!eainst ~ho !1ofo.Ada:1t. 1?;£0scnting the ~hii:c\.P...~~~no•ticc or:- his own lio.l)ility to tho d.Gfond2J1t w:i.-'i;hin twenty oi'l.Q dcys of ·the sex.vice of tho 'lbi:rd Pcll'-'i;y notice ur.,on him .............. prGsont to -'i;ho ooc:r'li a. 'Writtcn \ ' Stu·iic.raG1r'i. o-Z Dcfa110c. u (Einpb.o,sie suppliGd,.) C.learly t:·it Third poxty Cc'.:."1.not :rcn.sonab].y dispu-'ljc both the pla.i.11.tifft s Claim to - '.b!ic c.1.efo.n~l.::.ri; . n.nd :1.is lio.bilit~, to tho dofcmdr-.:.rt unloss n.1.1d untill hv has bGGl1 cCYailcC:. o:: mifi'icicnt facts ·~hn:t olc:.!l'l;y' disclose tho nature ot the pla,il'itiff•: ~ olnin_ to ·t,,'..10 dGfcncl.air~ a.11cl t::i.0 basis of his licl:lility to fuc dof011.da11t c..s clainod i.'1 the Th:i.rtl Poxt:· Wotico. ~ho qua.ritum of m.1.c:1. infOl'mo.tion can also 1:io- t,'-1.l\,"'G<I from the pro~sion -Of ~Vl-&.L O::r t.:110 .c,p'~·c .• -riiich provides and I qi.to·~o& , \ r_ _) - 5 - ~oadint' shall moan a. plaint or o. lll?it-'i;;m1 statement of DofG1100 5st1.0,l~ a. tfritt,<m S~n.t(lf10.n..-:;. at, D_afcmoo filod by o. 1l:,.1:i.rd Ptirty and such o-'lih<r.c subsoquont plaooings M f:k'\Y bo prosantcd i11 aoco:t'd..1.1100 with rul.Q 1'3, o. VIII, tt (F,mphasis supp;t~d), It is in euoh 001rto;.,-b of tho law that I nou p;.oooed to ~ tho oonto11t of t::ia th:i.'.t'd :p.:'.l'·~y notico, _scr.vod upon ·i.:l.g A_,G., and. -the tetu:~ · sontn.-tioits ma.do bci'o:ro_ -'c1:lis oottr-'i;; in respect oi' ·tho p:i:ol.imina;ey objaot~ons 1tc,:j.acd by the A.G. In JWea (§l), of t:.:.c ·l;~::ixd pe.l''t'IJ notico it is -'oho:rc statod a.e fo~o'tf.QC ttTako notice t:::.o:~ this action_ has 1)0011 brought by tho ' plain:ti:r-1 necinst tho def and.ante join:bly sooldng a. doolctro:Hon thnt tho rovocation o-Z tlio -plaintiff's right of oocupru;ioy by tho P.rosidGn-'i; is impropar. in law thcrcfoI'G void and tor damages and oosta .• u T'Ao qu.astion. t!~at i'oUows hero is rih.eth.ox that docs really rofle;t mte-Zioiont:l,y tho nu;ttWc oi' -'uho plaintiff's ' claim ~r.iitat t.'1-io 2nd defGl\dani• . .... ' · ~ 'Do bo o.blo to ~opa:-cly ns oc.rtain tha.t onG has. "bo ~-iwn to the plaintif:e• s plaint Md soG ·what_ is tho 0011'1.,~o of tho Platntitt 11:5' Gaao against tho 2nd . . . . .. . . . ' ~ Dofondo.ii-'~. That .is set Ot\°~ Oloa:t'l_y in WPrlal Ji¥\ 1). :hha pa,in:t EJ j,ch _state· l"l:lld. I quo;ss °1- 'Ille gcoond do:f'cud.ant has to dato nnd inspito of ro~n.-'i;ocl requests, fa.ilod to :.1a1\d ovor to tho. pln:i.11:l;iff vs.H·i,nt . . poseoseion ot .1;:10 osta.toa , a.fora-. sn.id ;:i.11.d. tho plcin~iff ola.ims f:tiara th.c socond doi'o11fu'.11-'c; s].'.)Goific p9rtormanoo o't -'!ilia saiµ. agroo-:- nont fol' snlo. 1J. Th.r::i/11 duo ·~o tlio notions ond omissions of tho 1st and. 2nc.l 2nd Dc;fondants -'GhG Plt\il:r'vii'f ha:t eu:f:f'~Gd. loes ca foll_o1-m (listed und.or SLtb. pixrs (a) to (o)).,ll • lib.~~ the plainti:tf preys for tho judgr.iont and dco~co fore- ('~) A. dcclc.:ration thnt tho rovooa.tiall. of ·l:iho pL.,,intifft s rigr.t · of OOCU'PaJlOY' HWJ- imiu'opor in lnw and in f.oot Md thorcfa:ra, ~ l and ·voici._ (b) Spooifio po:i:to~1:1nnoG of the 2nd Dofcndc.nt lee.ding to dclive;tty of vacant pass-coGion of tho Gomba Mtiw:iga. os"'iiatos a.a d.Glivery ao o.onta.inod in 1i:1a Doocl o~ TransfCl' ..u1.d. compensation by tho 1et Defcmd,.,·,n-'c; f'o:t' or,y assets romovad or ilGlllpGXod w.i. th after • the i;x['J1sfa 01' -'Gho Right of OocupallQY.-- ln tho altanativo awl- ,n:'.;:,,,out pr.ojudico (n) Sltlllinga 2,206 1 039.15 86.~et tho 2nd Dofc11d,-u1t, boixlg' oost of tho est ;:d;c s 1 DJ.td. ......{6. - 6 - {b) Shillings 06~532,145.00 against "lihG 1s-~ t'l1d. 2nd Daf'cndnnts, bd.ng trn.~:i.14\i aocommodation, log4 fooa ~nsos and loss of' LiOono, (as itonizod horoin)j plus inter.est and other· oosts. :t F.r;,om tho abO'Vo s-'G,;~~;:im.r~ of the cl....-u.m lJy ·f.:i.o plaintiff against tho 2nd Dof'cmd211t it is cvit:.Cl:.·~ tha.·~ wh.:..t has boc11 s-'lia"bod in n~a. (tiJ o:f the third pc.xty notice cc::vc-c"'.. 1.1po:1 ·li:10 11.G. docs no·t u-t. £1.11 properly N'ld. olooxly .reflect tho nr.i-:;,_1.ra of Jii:.,c plci11ti:ff' s ol,.ill O[tninst tho 2nd. Do:f'o11'1.·•.1x'c a.s to 0112,1J:i.a -::;:1c ·:;:.1ud pc:rty na.l:c r., ].)Topor nnd odGquatc; dGf'c1100 to Gl!Ch t::ird pn:rty :1<rcioo, FI.U'·~ormorc, 1ii:ilo ~ds 001.:i.rt wuld hc,.Vo been 1:>.repnr:od to fil'ld. tho sta;'aoo011~ in ,,2ara (ql o-Z -t:.10 t~d.l'd p8l'ty notioc -~o nclcquatGly :rcf'lcct on tho nattwo of' thG 2r.ul dci'cnicla.nt ts claim ag-ailtS"t -'lilrn t:1:i.t'd party, tho sto.tcuo11·~ ~ na:ra (pJ. of suoh third party notioc ns to tho reliefs cle.imGd. agai.11.at ·l;hc third pnrJizy- ia -'ooo goncral aa to oal:o i•t di.i.Aficult fo:r:i- tho third pt\t'ty to ma.Im out tma.·~ .roliof s · and of w.1a·'.; nnou·rua.o he would be :r:o~od to indotll"lily hi.':11 so as to cnalJlo tho J~1irc1. p ~ mclco a J.)l.'OPGl' and adoquAto dofcnco in rcrpaot of tho same,. Fox all 1-ihat has boon s-tatod · in para ( Q) of tho t:.d.rd party !lotico runs as f.ollowsi (o) The :reliefs clciL1od by the sooond dei'ond.an-'i; a€ainst you is for Ld,.cnnity 1Jy you to tho sooond d.Gfcu'ld.ont of tho plcintifft s olain e;.:cl costs of t:io OPtion." ~1n:li, in :.~' vic.;1 woi.iJ.<.l l1nvc becit aocqrha1Jlc had ·b~1cr:o boon stlf:f'ioicnt inf'or1:ic.1;~ion rolatine ·~o t:-.a nc:i.tt'.I'c 'of ~1c plain:bi:i:"1'·' s oln,it1 agronst tho 2l1d. &tcnd...1.1.l't. l:J riglr~l~l conkmlccl 1Jy the lco.t'ncd stri,fo fdtto.r11oy this collt't is net p:L'oporcd -Lo ncccp·b t:ic n;rg,.1r.1cnt by tho loro:intd oom1scrfi for:· tho 2nd. Dof.c11Ck""'llt -'li.!1r;~ it is. -'cl:c c1L!-ty of the third pa:rt: upon boin:B' served uith 1, third p~·zy notice to h1,U1t for· rul tho ro lcvnnt ij,u'ornn.tion to a....'·(H,rto.in o; dinoov~. tb.o :real 11a-'1i'JXO of tho cbim by the plnintli';f agailtst -'c~1c 2nd clof ondan.t J tl).c un;'i;v.ro o:Z ·rio cl.nim n.nd r.eliaf dla.imod by the 2nd au.O~.i.u.c.'1.11.'ti _,e,, _..,_ ' • clgn.ll1S t thC ..i.·V.:lll • d pa:P J.-., 11.y ot Lil00 J.n w.1.0l' o.l DJ.O, • 1:12\Y OJ• . W.10 du""""' .1.• ,UJ to su.pply such info:rmn.tion mtl'fioiont to GnablG tho t:.d.l'c1. pt:ll':ty propGJ:Jy prcpa.,:o tho dcfcnoG 'thor.oof, rosta squa.Gly u1,xm "lil:o d.G:f'o1tdant il1stituting tho tll.ir.d p~ty no t~o • h rsg~ds thG au:li:.10:d".;y ciJ~cd by tho loti.r11.Qd :r'.;nte .Attorney in suppori of his objoction, with rc2i1oot I do not think i-'t,; hns ~iy boaring on his a.t'guoc11.·~ t:12.t for t:10 ·::>.il'C.. pc::l'ty to be held _liable ·lf!.ico s.."1ould bo o.etablishcc1 cio1mcc·Hon 1Jo·~~;can the pL.c--dnti:i.-'f' El olc.im 0c:s1.tinat tho Dofendnnt · and tb.G Dd'crulc:-..n-ti s clc',it1 o.c;cinst tho third pt\!'t,~. Appa:ront~, tho dooision in thc;·.·ovc:r.soas ·I'our:i.l".(; Co, (Rand P.crviccrn) Ltd. oi·~od abovo by- :tvh!, MnJ.aba, oorri.'Jrod ~11 the is::uc 1-i:o·~>.c:i:- 1-rl:1,c:rc there nrc noxc -'li:.!.D.1-1. one dofcnd.n.nts n. f.ind.inc of no case to 2.noor in :t'cepaot of one o:Z ·tJ:c dofcnc1.'1.llts a.t the oloao - 7 - I • of tho plnintiff' e ca.so· 1tou.ld 01r'dlc tb.e dofcnd..1.nt ,rl:'G!.1 no oa.so to anm·ror to bo dieehar:g-Gd o~ dismissed fl!Om the suit. As to th.Cl pra;v-Gl': 1Jy ·i;110 looi'nad counsel f o~ ·tfio 2nd dofcndant th.1.t ju.d.u~ont. ·should bo 01~torod ~ s 1 ; the A. d. .011 fUVO\U' of tho 2nd de:011do.11-'.; n.s. pr:eyod :f'or: tho alleged fail:u.;r:o to :tile 1-T, S,D4 J ns i:.ig:htJ.y t;BUOd by 1~, Malt\ba i-'G is to bo noted. that in f~t t\ ~itum state,. mon-'o of Dofcnoo has been filed by tho A.O, mtd ill suob. tf.Ltitton. Sto.te. mont of l)ofonoo that -'i;ho ~climinory point' of obj_oo•~:i.on t'irBUGd before this Ool!rt by Mr. I>icw.1Ja, is -'oo be found ns the .fit'.'tt'J i b among. issu.ca •· ·:1 :t>c.:l.sea. M' tho above 1°oc.aoaa tl::.is oou:rt gr£1nts -'aho· ]Xt"Olil:ti.nary objoation. r!lif!Gcl by ,the A.G, n:i1d rule ·t:.;.nt t!:c thir·d po:rty no·aoo by -'liho 2nd. def'.ond.c.1J1-'G has failccL ·to d.isolosc suff'ioicmtl;y -'li.110 n..1.-'4il.WG of tho cl.aim by .tho ploJ.11.tiff necil1s"', ·tf.1c 2l'lC1. Dof anda.nt a.nd. -'liJ.lG roliof s olaioGd by tho 2l'lc1. doi'onctant r,gninst ·bhc A, G. as n. third J.Jr'X··:.Y, I· thc;r-ofor.o dism5.se the 21'.I.Cl. cl0.fend.Dnt 1·s third l)~~l;y notioo agp.insi; -~lJ.C A,G., with ooete, I cjr/µkl'J · R. I,llfA~ .. llolivcrad thio 1st c1.,,zr of December, 1994, c.t Dt'-1: os Salaam in tho p,:cso110c of' Mr. !Cal'olo fol:' the 2nd DGfcmdant, '•· .. hold.il1g b:riof. for' ~s,· l~ja.for Fl.o.il1.·~itf ""." l~. l{o.sh~.f.0% fst llei~t. JUDGE· ~-·~_......., 1/12/1994 .......,.._ Ordcr1 llcrn.r.iJlg of r1tdn m.ui adjourned...