19940530 TZHC Dar es Salaam
:..J.· ----....:. .:i, 11/c n~ TTIE m:arr COUR'l1 OF' TANZANIA i' ~- --- - ------~---- AT DAR ES SALMI: ;.! ·" ' I:iIGTI COU~1T C?.L~m.ciL £:..PF.2"l.AL lif0.166/93 ~ -~ o:?.IGii:.fi,.L CRif:II.bL c:~Sill lW. 154 OF 1992 OJJ' IJI'";E DISTRICT COURT OF BAG;J.10YO DISTRICT AT t __,---~- B.:".< liJ\iOYO ( \...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19940530 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1994
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
:..J.· ----....:. .:i, 11/c n~ TTIE m:arr COUR'l1 OF' TANZANIA i' ~- --- - ------~---- AT DAR ES SALMI: ;.! ·" ' I:iIGTI COU~1T C?.L~m.ciL £:..PF.2"l.AL lif0.166/93 ~ -~ o:?.IGii:.fi,.L CRif:II.bL c:~Sill lW. 154 OF 1992 OJJ' IJI'";E DISTRICT COURT OF BAG;J.10YO DISTRICT AT t __,---~- B.:".< liJ\iOYO ( \ VO!'IS'US TH,] UlIT'IDJ JEPOJitIC •o•••o•• D2:FOIIDERI 'I' __ ,_., T JlIDOEN::llH ffi-.J112.di IIas&"Jli Tile, t:i.o 2..:l?]?Ollant, end two otllo:a.s not bofo:i."C this• Coui,t 1-P:c-o conv:ictoc1. ·of tho kinclJ:'od o:ffal100s of housob:~'Oal.-dng and stoalinc;. On t>) one count ca.ch convict i·T2.G awc:i:'C'..od a custodicl son tonoo of fi.vo ~- ca.:r.'s end on tho otl.o:,: count each of t:1.or.1 was acnt to jail for ono your. Tl:·.o so:.~tcnccs wore ordo:rod to J?Lu1 concu.:r1."0ntly. A glai::.oo ;c..t t:ici ch2.:.•:-s--o sho0t 1 howov-::e, :i.nc!.io~:.tos t1mt al tlloajl t>o offonco chuccid. on t'.:·_,) fij~st count is l:.01.1.so- broald.nc;, the :p::1.rticul2.1,s show tto:!i t:10 offcnco 1-12.s cora...11. ttod at 2.00 a.n~ on th:; dc,;y- in quostio:1. Tho tiwo at lrh:i.ch t}.1.i.s offonco 1ms co;.".11:1:ittocl is an iopo:rtL,;.2t ingredient in J?j:•ovi.nc a cha.r&t.i oZ 'l:ih:i.s natv.xcy for if ·bL0 lJ1-.;)D.k:iJ.1c· is clone at niGht the offonoo ~-r.ill bo btu~&la:ry., It is houaobl.--coking- if tho offence is conr:iittod dur-.i.ng d.a¥tir:10. I run sn:t.isfiud.t, llomlVOJ; tb.o.t. tJ:19-~'0t_,<'.7\lle.rity ·doos not Vi~o..to the procoodil16 s ,.) booe.usc tho offonco on _which tho 2,1>pollnnt 'l'ms C.)l'litictdd is cognato to tl10 offence which ought to .hava boon p:rofon·od 1 f. Lot mo now come to tho oV;id"..:;1106 • $mJnira d/o Ism~ (Pitt) 1..vid .sb.e:rifu .Abdallah. (P:-T4) arc wifo ru1d hu_sbe;.1d., :aspoctiva~. 'lhoy live 2.t Illajcni l>li:ipana a.roo., Bo.gaooyot :Both of thom 1-101'0 not at homo on tho niGht of 22n~/23rd &ptcobo:i:, 1992, thoy had loft Saidi Abdallah (PWZ) mcl l,Jubsini .All~ CPJ'llt 1Johind~ PW2 an(l FW3 did not 11otico anytlri.nG strv.nc;o un tH 7.oo n..rle 011 23:ro. Soptonbe:r, 1992, ... ,.,:. . ~ whQn. MLl.llaini Abc.si uoko u:p to- atto~1cl c:. call of natu::-o, That -.,.'-. uas when ho ~ticod tb.at all tho dofFs which th.07~ ~,.,rod boforo tJ.1.0.;J· · :i.'Cti.i'Od f.:xr -~•c nicht.. U(u.'"'O ajar• El i11fo:cr:1od .}/.- ~. •,·: . "~--' , . \ , _. / 111111111 - ·-: 2 Saidi A1xlnl.1ol1 of what ho b::-.:.d soon :x1c.~ whon thoy macl.o m1 inspection of t~10 houso tho:· cliscoro:~'Od tr-.c:!.t" a number of porsoncl 01fccts, :i.l;tolucl:Lt1c.. o. bir: ::lo, a vaccuum nooc, clotlili1c; a;.1cl a. ,i1atross 1:c.rl ·· '.)On c lco,:rod f1vr.:i. tho house. They dccidoc1. to inforo Shur: i.lilo. Is1J;,,il (Pli1) of whet hr.•,.cl happonccl. lli:i:- :ro2.ction k this illfo:('!·10,t:i.on wo.s to J.'Ol)o::.·t tho ·I!latto:r.' 4i;:) tl:-.o Police ::--:; Bn.c;e1moyo; Upon J.'0coi'Vi.n.G t:Jj_;; ropo:i:-t PC Po.sk2J. (P}1'5) was dotailoct to conduct invor: igations in t}1is riatto:r. At that tir.10 no suspect was !Olltionocl to tho Police. On tho samo dey o.t a1)out 7.oo p , , PW1 rotv.:c.1cd to tho Poli co Station e.na. i.nfo:rnocl PW5 tJ:LD,t tl10 3:cd accused had boon· soon solliJ.1.c i taus whic:... bolongccl to the con1)ln.inal1ts. This :i.nfo:1.,n0,tio11 was 2.ctod QrJ. prontJ.y n.nd. 3rd a.ccusccl w2.~ axrostcct n.t lVIc:..;ori1oni Bus st<lt1d, :Bn.::~rnoyo. 3rd Accusoc1 ,ms carryil1c a nylon baG c.·~ tl10 tine of his o.r:rost; tho contents of th2,t ixi.G 1-10ro found to "bo sor.10 ::f tho J?re>:po:rty of tho oomplain1.-"l1its. 3::x'- r.,ce;uoor.l ,:~2,s td;:or. to tho. Poli co ~at.ion whore ho i::: t..lloe,uc. t,:_1 hc:~vo adr1i tto,1 tho offonco an<.'.t il:rpli- oatcd tho 1st accu.s~c. ( a:ppollr.l'l t) c.'..;1 uoll as tho 2nd aoou.sod, in tb.l pN son co of P1'T1. Mo,.1.wrbilo, on 24th Soptoo1:io:r, 1992, tho appellant ctpproacll.oc1 tho com-gl2.il12J.1ts et 't>oir hoi:10 onc1. told Pii4, in tho pr-csonoo of PW1, tha.t ho was :c<:nd:y to oomponsato. tho . couple ab.s.15,000/;:: for tho rJr-1.tJ:8;::s ho hod stolon. Tho o.ppollor.1.t w~s ar1"Cstccl as ho was nogoUating tho _j conpim1sa.tion. $lose o.ro tho facts on _which tho a~ollant wr-.s convicto<.l. 'E.10 lo..u::nod tricl District 1fogia~rato u:.1s satisfS.ccl tl,.at thoro was a brocld.ng ai.1d va.ri,o,:IJ;e ~OJ.1.fll, I offacta ~ s~~U. lb wa.a .tl}..rt1.oj:- sa.tistiod tl:et t]:,;,o '1)poll[1l1t ancl tho other tw:, e.ccusocl. rio:rsons who did not a.pponl 11,.,,;:l thoir @lilt proved boyonc:. my l."Ce,s0112.blo doubt. 1.3:lo am:iollant ,~~1s o..::-, ..:..•:;_,T,rocl rn.'ld ho.a lodged fivo grounds o:l:' 2..J?3~02:l wluch, in effect, ::iay oonvcl'liontly bo oonsoliclo.toct in ono ground., ncuoly · that t)1oro was not ariough ovj_clo:100 upon H11.i.ch tl:o r.:ppollent could have boon found.. Qlil tj>·. Ho con tonds t::.:at ho Wc:,s Car:L"Yll'J.G not~l1.G' :i,norlr:1:Lt12.tinc at tho tine of his a.i.""'il.'Ost, ho donios to ho,w a.pproc.'.chocl PT-1'4 in the nanno:r. P:71 and. PW'4 allqgo, In hi.a ..... /3 3 View onl~r tb) 2nd. 2nd 3rd C:,GOU.socl 11'"'.d their guilt J?l'OYod. 'li:0 ROl.)Ublio supportR tho conv:iction ~1c":. son~CJ.1COS which 110:i:vv ioposod on tho 2,,ppolla.nt. }l,:,0 ·BJ.£'J.1G.cs, loewJ.1od Sta.ts Attorney, has st1.b1iu-tt,, c.l that the:re wes st1~011g evidence which :proved the 6 uilt of t;1e appellant. In his submission., this evidenc0 inch1cles t!.:e G1)pellant 1 s O1-m admission and the! readiness which ho shmrecl to compensate. the oom.pla.inants for the matress which Tii.:1.13 ono •jf tho piocos of p1'ope:i:·ty which wore stolen ,.from tho hone:::· 6 After oxam:inir-¼'.; tto vidonce on reco~i:d, tho:i.'o appeaxs nothing which suc;g-osts -tj at there was reason 1-r:.1ioh would ha-0e ' actuated PW1 and PW4 to f:i:1Qii1e the appellant, Altr.ough, therefore, the aprell,m-b 1ms ro:Tested without any i.110:dmina-. ting material on his 1)0~:son, hi o0r;i.dact lG?lda -00rroboration to the testimony ~f P1i1 o.11d .FW4& For if he did not steal the ' . matress ho could not h:r,to off erod to pay compensation for · it. L"l my view .tho 8:.f>J?ollant' s conviction cannot be faulted. In tho result tJ::..o r:.wvocil is d.ismissod in its onti:cety. Conviot:ion aontonoo a."'lcl orders made b~r tho trial Court aro . . upheld. ' " '( _::;·_;-:-;rtmaE; .. 30/5/1994. Appellants P:t-osent in Peroon Mr. Jll.andoa {s/A)t Fo~: 11.osponclGnt Ropi.iblic