19940513 TZHC Tanga
\... DC CI'JIL :::.:_,:,.·· "lL.L EO. 26 OF 1990 D,, ,n-,-, I,.\.., '.L•JGOTO 1 - ••,..., 'J • _.JJ -,1 0, 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O -, 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O tf O O O O et 0, o .i:'"":..,LL' ,:,m ••~~7----:::!..::.~ ..:..P:?L.1 Ct.Il"T v::J . :srn I. 1:cs:c-io1lllc~1t ue:ce l1usk:.ncl ::,.i.1.t\ ~life<> Their...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19940513 TZHC Tanga
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1994
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
\... DC CI'JIL :::.:_,:,.·· "lL.L EO. 26 OF 1990 D,, ,n-,-, I,.\.., '.L•JGOTO 1 - ••,..., 'J • _.JJ -,1 0, 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O -, 0 0 0 0 o O O O O O tf O O O O et 0, o .i:'"":..,LL' ,:,m ••~~7----:::!..::.~ ..:..P:?L.1 Ct.Il"T v::J . :srn I. 1:cs:c-io1lllc~1t ue:ce l1usk:.ncl ::,.i.1.t\ ~life<> Their r.1&::c:c.i.c.,,:;.s lies clis::::olved b3° t.'.'.:: tri ..--,1 p:;::).;:.1;.-,.:-::y cou:d afte]:· it J:w,d upheld tlte pet:i.tion fo1° clivo1•co fiJ.oc1 °!)j,' t;::.c :;_•3spond.011t. ..:;,t t::c tiEJ.e of dissolution of V·,et:c' r.uC::':.:·io...:;e t:.:c p8l.'t:i.oo ne:.;-e livi:tlJ in SC;_?:.-.:eationo "(h t11 the evidence on I"eco:L'd the i::."ial J.)l'L1a:;.•y cou,..•t r.12..::;ist•0,te and :.ie:;:- two asseaso:cs nna:nir.10usl3r held ·L:~t t!!e :parties' ;:,12):::.·iace was ~:G:oken beyom1. :;:-e:;;r-;,u-., I:n tl:is apj_)eo,l appellant is c1mllen0 inc tl,is find.inc whic]; 1,;z:,s also up;_:,.cld ~:··· tb.e f::_-c;st appellate Dist:::ict Gourt., th~~,t L,ppellant hG.d l.Jeen pe:i:sj_::itei1tl;; accusin.~; :.~Cl' of ccmspi:i:ine; i i it.'·. ot:.1e:..· people in be, wj_tC:,irl(;· :.1i1:1~ .Lnd for this :i.'e,::-,son appellc."mt stoj;i3100. tddn;_; fooc1 in tl1ei:c horn::e. Like tl1e tI"ial prii.i12;c"2·· cot!i:t, I upheld. tl0.s co!1tcntion,. To a ce:::td.11 extent appcll8.l'lt ~i..uself' ~1as co:rrobo:;:-c,tod tbis c1Sse:;.•tion in h:i.s defence 11hen lie questioned t:.10 decision of t:-.e ::respoa1ent in ag:reein_::; 1-1i t:.l otl1er people to ta.kc '..lir,1 to a tI"adi tio;.12,l hec.,lc:;.• 11:.•on he w;:,,s nucsi:nc a 1.!i.•oken lec;o To t:le appellwt, this dec:i.sion :;:;10.nifests :ccsponclent' s lle w:i. t ch.i.nc tenclei1cies n..:;ainst :un~ ..'.::_Qpel12.11t :i.s failinc to ~c'diom,lise why ::;_•cspondent 'bcin,5 a t::rainod nm·se slwriJ.d llave activ0l~T J,)o.:i.'ticipat0d iri the 2,ct of t.µcinc lii:.J to t!:cc sdd native medicinen2.n. This is n, clea;;:: evidence tl:w,t appello.i:lt had 12..st t:;.•ust in t:.1e 1·es;iondcnt.. As a whole t:,.c t:;_•ial p:i.'ir;ic1.:ry 001..r;,t r,1ncintl•do was ::;_•icl1t 1r:.~en s:10 held th::i.t the req_nisi to ruat:rimonial t: •:-:,'Jt 0 is no loi,c;e:;_• in existence Lotueen these pa:i:'tios. o • o/2,. ,i - 2 - Tl:.is :f:L1d:U.1.::; is.12..e,;,:__ ~_e_ a cle8)..' indication tl1..---..t t:.-:,_c na.::::,::-ia;e in qnestion is D:i'oken -clo1m 1Y:i;7011d i•e:pai:l.·,. The le,:;,.~nec1 :Oist:;;ict Ea.:;ist:._,.::,te ,1o,c m.•onc-; when he helcl ·t::.:.>,t t:1e:.:e wa,s no C,Tol!l1cl · juntifyins d.issol:1-tfo;1 the cv::.<lonce on reco:L'd., :;_"Io1rove:L', inspite of t'.:t:i.s misdil·ection, t:_,.c DO{'.;i.st.'2,te I s concludi.i'.l(; fi.i.1chnc is co::c:cect., It :i_::: :f.:,,ct1..Ic,ll.7 t:.:.'ue t:.: ,t costso :::.espon0.ent: ...\1Jsent. ( .La T:1 aI( c, .•I~----'-~l:~~~--~) ~J~C}l1 ··.Ior ~~;_:~~:GIST ,·;_ __ ::-t T.."J7CL_ .... _. ....'· , ·y \ 'h / .