19941122 TZHC Dodoma

IN mE.JllGlr OO'ORT' ~ ~ .AT DODOO (ro.)..m APPEAL- ·.NO... 61 OF 1994 {moM THE DECISION OF 'IHE DISTRICT COURT OF MPWAPdA. AT ?'.II\'/ilW.A IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 31 OF 199,) BEFORE J.M. ~DIDA- ~ .DISTRICT MAGISTRATE ORIGINAL C!V'IL CASE N◊e 12 OF 1,F--W 9-.l:JB,B.JUL PROO.RY OOUR'l! .Jl!:r·~ nISTBIOT~ CHIGALILA. MTALISI • • • • ·• ·• ·• , APPELLANT MA..DUU. LE',JETO • • • . • , e • • , • RESPONDENT There is a Civil Case ~ be.fore the· Urlian- P r ~ Court a.t Mpwapwa,• In that Case the a~azi!~ cJ.a;i.In:i.ng,t''i11 the respondent eight heads of cattle :from the responden~ In the i ,ow:ae"'tf hearing the ·appellant sUQleasi'uliy ·a~plied £Or a.ti8-;runent befi,re Judgment 1 , The F<l,er for attachment befQre JUdgmenw was made £or eight heads of cattle said to belong to the respondent., ~ ,xe1utj,ng the . ·•rder I eight h_eads ..•. of tattle were attB.fhed . ,. • . 'rr6~· . the kr~ of' fle Ma.la!ka._Ma.cha.ka;;; ~t ·was don,e becaus~ the . - latter Wa.'3 said to ·be 1n custody of 'th~ respdndeniis"· e.t;ghf he~ of eatttet The sa4,d Ma.chaka was agg:deved by ''that order and a9 ~sstull.y appl,ied for·· ·tn ·erder ·to raise· that •trdef en the ground that the atta,ehed1,eattle ao~uru.ly belonged ta bJ.mt. The _~Court was satisfied that even the appellant was not ·,e~e whether thl~1attle in quest-ion ·belonged to the objeftor (ltfalaJ.ka)' C' the respond;~t~- ...Tll~ ap~ll~t ~- dian.tisfied by the Pri.mary- Court. deeision and. so appeal.ed t.c the District:Co~• .• -~., • ;. I • •·~ •• j, • He lost and hence this seeond. cppcal, • l. 2 This appeal has no merit•·. :Besides the appellant I s bare asaer;,tion that the 0{1ttle be1onged to the respondent no evidence was forthcoming to establish that they really belonged to the said respondent. Lndeed on 1/9/93 the appellant is on record as having told the Primary Court thus:- '11 Kwa mali naku.bnliana na mtenguzi siwaolewi ng 1 omba hawa. kama ni mali ya mdaiwa au mtenguzi •. " In.the circumstances there1 is certainly n~thing to fa;ul.t the ooncurrent find;tngs of the two lower·courts. The appeal.is dismissed with costs • . (J .H. MSOFFE) JUI)GE 22/11/1994 Pelivered in chambers this 22nd d.ay of November~ 1994 in the pres~nce of both parties. :~ (J.H. 1'1BOFFE) JUDGE -:--- 22/11/1994