ulf nilson vs alice lunguli 1997 tzhc 216 27 september 1997

IN THF HT C H COURT OF TAN/'. ANT A fDAR KR SAT. AAM DT S T R I C T RF . CT RT RY ) AT PAR FK RAI. AAM CT VT T , RRVTSr OH NO . 7 l> OF I 97 7 IJT.F NTT. SRON APPLICANT VF. RSHS AT. T C F MJNOIJT.T - RE SPONDE NT RUT. TNG ON R E V I S I O N KAl . KGEYA , .7 , One Ui f Ni 1 sfiOti r e p r -e s e n t <*(1 hv Mr . Rut a b i n g w a Advocat e . h a v i na b n e n aaarieved hv the Ruling of K i s u l ti R e s i d e n t Mag i.st r a t e ' s C o u r t dat'.fid 2 4 \ 3 \ 9 7 on his p r e 1 i mi n a r y o h i ect. i o n s has come t'o t h i s Court a r me d w i t Vi a c h a m b e r summons supported by an a f f i d a v i t p r a y i no for i nvocal ion of its t pv i s i ona 1 po we r s under ' S. 79 of the Civil Procedure Code and reverse the finding of the 1 owe r c o u r t . The Respondent. A1 ice [.uncivil i . represented hv one Mr . Ms e mw a . A d v o c a t e , resisted t he ft a m e . T ri o r d e r lo at>pr ec:i at e t h e issue at hand, going through t he historv of I he u i a l t e r c a n 1I he avoided., and I he following is its suntma r y , Tn C i v i 1 Ca s e No. 4 7 7 X 95 the Respondent sued I he A p p l i c a n t for' , a mono others, recovery of Swedish Kronor 65.000 paid as down p a y me n t for a contract not performed to required standard;. Swedish Kronor . 8000 for' unnecessary travel expenses incurred. Tshs. 3 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 /= as d a ma g e s for inoonvinienee and emharrasment. Tshs. 1 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 /= b e i n g value of property vandalised and the usual prayers on interest and cost's. On the other hand the Applicant, while disputing the claim, counter-claimed shs. 4 , 4 4 8 . 0 0 0 /=, interest an d costs allegedly being an o u t s t a n d i net balance on a contract of house renovation due to hi m from R e s p o n d e n t , On 3 0 \ 1 \ 9 fi t h e Respondent ' s claim was d i s m i s s e d f or non-appearance and on 7 \2\96 j u d g e me n t was entered in favour of Applicant regarding the c o u n t e r - c l a i.m . T h e r e a f t e r the Resnondt - * n I ' s rliambnr aon l i c a t ion to k p Iaside I bp d i sin i s s h 1 f t r df t r and pypflft p j udgementw a s <1 i sin i s s e d . That, was nri f>\ 4\^ . Then Ih e r e f o l 1o w e d I axat iono f costs on !}\ 7 \ Q 6 . and e y e r n f ion p r o r e ^ d I nga in w h i c h I he Respondent ’ s h o u s e was attached On 4\1.1\96. a mo n g nl h e r k . I ho Court’ o r de red . "The attached property to ho sold hv Publ in Auct i on on 24\11\9f>". Howevfir . the above order could not ’ lie c a r r i e d out as t he Respondent filed (on 6\11\9fi) a chamber a p p l i e a l i on s u p p o r t e d by an affidavit . and since it. forms one of the ce ntra l issues in the present matter, let me reproduce it subs tant i a l l v - ♦I ( made under Order XXT. 74 / 1 ) and I ? ) and Ordei XXXVTT Rule 1 of the ( r ir ) section 4 R ( i Ha) of the Civil Procedute Code ! 9ftfi - and sect i on fiB (p ) and any other e n a b l i rta p r n v i k i o n * of the 1 aw \ (emphasis m i ne ) . ( i ) That the Honour a b l e Ma u i ft t r a t e lie p l e a s e d t o grant a temporary order of injunct ion r est r a i n i n g the R e s p o n d e n t s ..................f r o m disposing off and or in any way alienating the suit property pending the determination of Die main suit. H i ) That, the Honourable Court ma y b e pleased to raise the order for attachment and s a l e of property known as and situate on p l o t No, 493X40 Kinondoni D i s t r i c t Har ps S a l a a i r i ................................" Again, as was the case in previous apnl icat i ons lavitv on the side of the Respondent ' s a dv oc a te 1^d to dis m is s a l of this a p p 1i e a I i o n on I f! \ I 7 \ 9f> , which was. followed by another Court order /on J \ 1\97 ) to the following effect. 3 "Proclamation of the sal e of the attached nr o w i t v to i r,sue. The sale to be done bv p u b l i r- Aucl i on on Sunday of 76' 1X97' ' . On |7\1\Q7 the litigation Sfififlied if'* b e <x>*ni no to an end as what seemed to V)p r e m a i n i n o then wa s how the dpcrpp waw to be settled. On that date l . hp followinu i s what » r a n s p i r«<l in court whpn M i 1 a n ?. i awl Ru tabinuwa. 1e a r n e d ronnsfl were r p i >i p ^ s t i t i no the RoKnotul i 1 'nI ari d App 1 i c a n t t HKnpfl i v o l 1v . "Mr , M i l a n ?. i ; Wp have reached ppI t lenient !n 1b e . m o d e of (1 i s e h a i a i n o I h' p dpbt . We I h e t <> f o i p twav that I tip nidfii for sa lp of ,7 \ d p b t o r 1 s house I I mj < "tin i n u Sunday. i p . 1 Q \ 1 \ Q7 s h o u l d bp suspended for three mont h s w .p . f . today . Mr. Rul a b i n u w a : II ik ol< a v Tbp a mo u n t due up l o I bp 1 i mp of f i 1 i rtci I Hp apt.) I t e a ! i <>n is Tsbs (> , 081 t f) A/~. Thp interest at ID?; for >Tu l v today -- 1 . 0 1 7 , F; ? R . fiO . Tbp i u d c j e me n t debtor is nnd«r taking to pay t million today and t fieri another mil 1 i on by J Ot . h February. And then tbp balance to he paid on nr bpforp 17th of April . 1 C) 9 7 . Tn I tip e v e n t of dpfault sale to procppd , Tbp i uduement d e b t o r s h o u l d also pay thp Court R r o k e r 1s fees. Hr. Milati7,i: T am in a qt eei nent with those I p i ms . Order: Sale of thp at t ached boi i . se suspended for three monIbs. - J\debfor to pav Court Rrok^rK fees - Rp I t 1 ement of the case in respecI of ! he d n o t pt a 1 a s in the mo d e and terms herein above", Four t v one days later (on ? . 6 \ 2 \ 9 7 ) . this time advoo. at ed by Mr, Msemwa, learned Counsel . the Respondent filed another chamber application as follows;- it ( Made under XXT , R. ri7 . sect.ions 4RM b e I . fiR a n d !l r) of the Civil Procedure Code. 1 Io u e I he r with any other enablina provisions of lawK + ....................................... ....................................... f o l I ow i mi r 1 tp f s : - ('at That a t 1achmen I ohIpi in l e s p e d of appl i cant i‘ i ) house nn pl°l N<> 4 lH \ 4 0 Kinondoiu Ij>:ih I j p t ,1 s i n t:t> f H^ s iH i (1 1u ) 11 f* i c; r ^ k i f] p fi ( i ^ ' r r* r e s p o n s e . I he applicant. t e p r *->spn i p<! hv Mr. Ru I a b i n a wa raised r>r e 1 i m i n m - y olMPolions - that I!,p a n p l i c a t j or , is barred by lim itation of 1- i me 3n days have *1 r « » « d v Plans*-, ! * ! nee • similar application was d i sin i r k p i ! on !R\1?\9ft (which was f i l ed on F>\11\9fi ) ; that 1 l ie affidavit lacked pinimi vpi i ( icat ion , and that the application offended f he provisions of O.VT HP (", - f i I i no phot o c o p i es i n. st . ead of cop i es . T have laboured through the history of the matter leading to the issue before us. even at the danger of making this m l i nt i unduly lonu, jus I for clarity. While s till on this 1 should point out that while the appl i cant has thronuhouf been represented bv Mr. R u t a b i ngwa Advocate . t lie Respondent has had a string of advocates. Dr. r . amwai , Mr Mi l a n z i . Mi. Me h o me . and now Mr. Ms emwa. p r o m p t ! no Mr. Rutabinnwa's observation "that he has bepn charm ino advocates like c l o t h e * " . which though cynical is not without mst i f i c a t i o n , and which act could have contributed to the present state of affairs. Now let us go back to the cent. ,1 , ssue , h iR matte,: the ruling of the Resident Mao i st r a t e ' s Court on t hr- preliminary obieel ions iaised by Mr Rulabinuwa. which M,|,na is the subject of these revisional prncfimlimis. The learned Resident Magistrate over-ruled the objections by finding that the chamber application filed on 5\11\q6 and dismissorl on was different from the one filed or, 26\7\97 (both chamber applications quoted a h o V P *; that Respondent in the present, application was not time barred as she had the protection of S. ? n of I he haw of limitation.. Ad.. Which section Stipulates that time starts (o run when lh, person outside the territory returns and f i na I I y that l he objections and counter oh,Potion on the affidavits and Photocopies were not material, and thus ordered the appl i c a t ion to proceed on merits. r D As ea r I i er p o i i d oi l out . ^ d v o i M I e«e f ot hot |i p a r i i n s wf i p af forded n i m n i t un i t v !o assist Mm rout! in t lies, * revision.)! p r o c e e d i nos , They almost re i I a I od I Ik - i i s u b m i s s i <>ns in.-nh* h e f o r e the 1 o we r f'fiii I . T ri I hese n r o c e e i l i u >i v . howev e i ! lie s"f itnr *1 -s i ri f s raised do not touch the decision c o n c e ? n i mi oiel iminarv ol riect ion on affidavits and photocopies hence T will not consider t hem. he t us start' with the comp l a i n t on I lie u» e l i hi j n a r v o h i e c t ion concerning the nature of t he two chamber a p u l i oat i o n s : - - whether or not I he one f i 1ed on 6\ 1 I \ . i nd d i sm i s s e d on 1 fi\ 1 ') \ Qfi is s i in i 1 a t to I he one ( i ! ed on 2fi \ ? \ Q7 Mi . Ri d a b i n o w a f oi 1 lip Appl i card i n s i s t e n t ly submiI ted I hat f he I wo ano! I rat ion;; be i m i similar . apart, from t I <e latter' h e i n <> I >a 1' i because <> f (lie af f l hx ion of t i me , I eo a l I v it could no i be Filed a I t es h and that' the ( in 1v couf se open to I he Respondent was lo aut> I v to set as i de the d i si n i s s a 1 o r d e r I h 11 s i e s I o r i no ! ho t o r me i As vivid ly shown above the former annlica! ion was btoiicjhl under 0.21 . R 24 M l and ?. 0.27. Rule 1 . 5?. 4 P. (]He> and 68 (el CPC: p r a y e r 1' w e r e for a I e it1 1 »<>r a r v o r d e r of i n i 11 e I i <>n a u a i n s ! A p p 1 i ( ;a n t from d i s p o s i i io or a I i e n a I i no I he t >t <>t >e i I v ( h o u s e ’) a nr] also for an older raising at t a c h m e n l The la! I pi a t a i l i e a t i r i ri ma d e under 0.21. R . 57 . K . 4R ( 1W e), 68 and Q r, C P C was for a single prayer; attachment on t he house he raised as it is resident, ial , Order' 21 is the Order in the Civil Procedure Code governing execution of decrees and orders. Rule 24 M l of 0.21 relate s to court s other than I hose which passed f lie d e e r e e to which ext r a c i e r ] decrees have been sent f o r - 1 he sole purposes of execution. Rule 57 relates to invest i g a f i o n of claims to and objections to attachment of at t ached nronertv. 0.27, Rule 1 CPC. deals with t emporary iniuctions auainsl proper t v in d i s p u t e in a suit wh i o h is in danger of be i no waster], damaged or a lie na ted . R, 48 (1 W e ) excludes a " r e s i d e n t ial hou. s e or b u i l d i nti , or part of a house or building occupied bv the i ud (i erne n t debtor. his wife and dependant children f <n i e s i den t i a 1 p u r p o s e s " from a I I a c h me nI in exeeut ion of a decree. R. 68 is a supplemental provision and under (e ) it is provided, "Tn order to prevent the ends of ju s t . i c e f r o m h e in g <lef e a t ed t h e c o u r t mav . s u b i e c f t o a n v r ill e s in t h a t h e ha 1 f ~ m ake s 11<1h r >I h e r in i t•i I o e i i ! 01 v o r d e r w a s ma v a p p e a r l'r> t h e <■o 1 1 t t I <> be i u s t a ii <1 <■r >11 v e i m e i : ! " Q i < t lit' p r o m i n e n t K e n t io n a c t i no ar; a s a f »--* I v v a I v*» t h 1a t i nu I o t he i n h e r e n t D o w e r s of N ip c o u r l " I o m akp s u c h o i -I h i s a s m. i v ’o r 1 r i p n e s s a r v f o r 1 h e e n d s o f iu s I i c e oi t o p r e v e n t a b u s e of t h e pt nnoss o f t he c o u r t " T h e s e ( e I 1r ? * o rtler s hi h] kpi’ I i or i s tif I he C P C r e f e r t p i ! t o in th p t wo am>! i t *. 11 i t ' i i ; - C 1e a r 1 v I I h' i p f m i' H i Mi ' l from ; ■i I i11 <i I ! 11 - w f 111 h i i >t o v i r, i o i 1k of I I \p* l a w ( . hi . i i h a no I h e r e t m s i I j <•n <, I |,iv|l v o f I lie a d v o e a t e s c o n c e r n e d 1 in the former applical ion - ie. 0 . .'17 w h i c h is totally inapplicable here ami so is Rule 7 < \ ( \ \ of 0.71 . the I wo applications are s i m i l a r in subs t ance and form. Of course, in the former app! inaf i on . in the f irst n r a v e r , I l ie a p u l i n a n l wa s ext r a v a g a n t with wot d s because she c o u l d nol r » f pi to "final determination of the suit" as she wa s not aoolving to spt aside any of t tie d i s m i s s a l orders or ey - p a r t e i udoemenl . However tfiinpnrary i n i net ion order to rest tain d i suns i t ion of the attached proper! y ar i d prayer two , to raise I lie ai t a c h m e u t were a i me d at one goal - to prevent the a I t ached house ft out b e i no sold as it is 11na I I a c h a b 1 e under Ihe law Thai in 111 . t v e r I wo in the first a p p l i cat i on the applicant didn't si .ee i f v f a s she did in the 2nd ^ PP "1 t e a t i ori ) 1ha I the Ik i i j kp in o ue s t ion is 1e u a 1 1v riot s u i > i e c ; t't o attachment is i n»na f e r i a l and is c u t ed bv the clear i n d i e * I ion o f fi. 4- R( 1 W e ) CPC in the t i t le of the chamber summons. nnd Ihe contents of Ihe affidavit in supportthereof /in pa r a o t a p h 11 thereof the deponent alleges that it is a dwelling house). C o tic 1 1 id i n g on the above issue, t am s a t i s f i e d b a s i n u on I be substance of both chamber s u mmons together with the content a of the supporting affidavits, that both applicat ions are the s a me n o t wi t l i s t a n d i n g the inclusion of irrelevant order and sec! ion of the CPC. Mr. Rutabinawa's preliminary objection on this should have been upheld by I l ie lower com f Next to consider is what , should Ihe respondent s have done. Mr. Rufabingwa for Applicant contends that Respondent should have 7 a u p ! i ed for r p i n s t a l e men t of I he formal a p p l i c/i! i n n he could not. f i 1e a fresh <‘h a ni l i p r . i t >t j 1 i i ' a t i • >r i i mi ! a tI ' i I tip t o miip r wh i < • 1 1 was fl i sm i KS' ad . a d d r u n I ha t i ii a 11 v' i' i(^(> ! I)!> f t e^h Hpp ! i cat i on wa s I i 111 A I'M 1 I Hll T |. l i n e d . havilKl he M I I !,) I ! m| Il U!l>l I C Hl Hill:-:. . U P similar . -1 fif 1 the f o r mo r l i av i no been fl i s mi s r i j '1 ( f ■m I 8 \ I \ 9 f> ) "for wa n ! r> f o r o s p f i i t' i o n " . M r . Rut a h i n o wa ' s si i bm i s s i o n can only t >e u p h e I <1 . Under the C ’ iv i 1 Procedure Code I here are no specif if nr n v j s i onf. for a p p l if/ll i o n s in telal i on !o f a i l u r e of p a r i i pm to appear a m) (‘oil M eo I If' 11 ('e S I he r eo f hi l l as; these take Ihe 1!e !le I a I f (' ' in of suits appl icanl would fi1! II i p p o s i t i on of plaint iff and Re s p i a i d e n I t hat. t> f TV* f e n d a n t , a i if] c n n s f i n i i i J i i f OP for non-apuea r auces of plaintiffs and D « f « ndar < t « d i n i tic I he proceedings wonlil invaluably also apply lo Appl i c a n t s ami Respondent s . Tn I Iih I'rist* a I hand , on I V v l ^ \ ()f> Mi . Mi l an' / , i , Advocale l ot Respondent ( Respondent in t his mat t e r ) wa s I he one wh o applied for f i me t' o s t u d y t he c o n n f e r ~a f f i da v i t and v c on I act his cl ient and that mat t . pi - was adjourned hv consent to 1B\1/\Qf >. and the order insisted "hast h e a r i no on 1 3 \ 1 2 \ ftfi at 11 . 0 0 am" . On IIip agreed date and time Mr. Mi I a n ? i did riot surface and the anpl ioal ion earned a dismissal order, Cl ear 1v I hereToi e I he matter falls imder 0 .9 . Rule (5C 'P C . under which ordet . alter dismissal of the mailer f l ue to failure of plain! iff on due h e a r inc.) d a t e the s a me can'I he f i 1 ed afresh hut rat her if a party wishes, can applv lo have I he dismissal order set a*: i d e /" . . . s h a 1 1 ho Precluded f r o m hr i n o i no a f r p s |i s i i i ! hut may apply for an order to km I I he d i s m i s s a l aside ...if he sat i s f i e s the com I I ha I I h e i <■» w a s si if f i <* » e n l cause f or ' liis in » n - appea r a nee . . " . Thus, on Miis a 1s o Mr . Rut a b i n u wa ' s s u b m i s s i or i s should have been upheld. The Respondent' had just one alternative: f.o a p p l y fo set aside the dismissal order and no! to file a fresh a p p l i ea t i o n . T w o u l d h a v e e n d e d t h e r e b e c a u s e I l ie n u c l e u s o f I h e m i l t e r h a s a l r e a d y b e e n p r o v i d e d w i t h a n a n s w e r b u t f o r o n e m o t e i s s u e w h i c h r e q u i r e s c l a r i f i c a t i o n . C o n s i d e r i n g I h e w a v ! h e l o w e r % c o m I t r e a t e d I h p o u e s i i o n o f L i m i t , - * ! i o n o f I i m p w h i e h d r e w i n «) I h e r i mi i >r ) t I , 111 1 i s ii*-;-: ,) ( k I a I .si i i •< 111 i ( i t-‘ i m h i | l i t j fa c t I i ia I t h e s e a t e ff> V i K i D I M I U l f H ’ H H l l i n o s . r h a v e i I 11 I I I ( I i ! m . r f t K K H I - V t o c l n a I w i t h i t a s w h I 1 , M r . Ms emwa . Advocate. f < >r I he R e s tx >i id e i 1 1 submitted. which .submission was upheld by (tip lower court that as H i p Respondent was outside i he country, S. 70 of t hp r . aw o f I. u n i t at. i o n protected hp r bpeause time starts to run from Hip day of her return into thp count r v . adding. that and mote so in this case whprp H i p advocates were act . i n a without her authority - that t hose ho 1d i nu t tip p o w e r of Al . t o t t i p v and who enoaaed t hose Advocat.es were not legally recognised. S. 70 of the l av; of Limitation states. fn coi npi i l i no the per i od of limitation pi e s e r i b e d for any suit oi an a p p l i c a ! i on tor eyoeii I i on of a decree, the t i me d ur i no wh i c h t be defendant h a .**: b e e n absent from the United Republic shall lie excluded". ^Suffice to say fhal . Hie above quoted s e c t ion can't he called to t he aid of the Respondent as Hr . Msemwa. learned Counsel and the lower court, seem to suggest . This seel i on protects a person who is outside the territorial boundeiies when a cause of action arises, and has no representation but not a person who though outside the country originates p r o c e e d i r i gs and prosecutes the s a me either through advocates or persons with powers of attorney. Tn the present case the Respondent though residing outside the count r y was the one who filed t tie c a s e against the present Applicant, Not only that., she subsequently appointed people- w i t h powers of Attorney, and the various advocates she engaged is a telling factor- on this - that the said advocates at t i mes pr o v e d to be laxv does not ma k e I l ie said renresenlation illegal or non-existent Wh e n discussing this limitation of time issue. with respect, the learned Resident Maoist r a t e rumbled into irrelevant matters and misdirected himself in the end. H e went t htough the history of the case, found that the advocates for Respondent did represent her in rnml though in Ian- mann e r which was enough * finding In enable him d ^ i o h Hip ,i p p I <r a b i 1 i I v of f. . 20 of the T,.'iw o f limiation hut s till he w.m on. and for clarity let Vt i f ? w o rrl u n r t 1 3 V t ) if* p n ' h n p . "ft mav not- bp. r e l e v a n t to no! • ic! ^ lhal the a p p lica n t is a 1ay person . T t is cl *h a ! t h i s ma * * Hr ' ^ f ' properly handled by Dr. l . amwai and his narlnets this problem wouldn't have a r i s e n at a l l 1 am ma d e to understand that Ihe applicant's rase was dismissed due to lark oT sr> r i o t i s n o s s on the part of Ihe Counsel for appl icant . Thereafter t I'..- s i t u a t i o n ,-oulrl not he saved at a n . T would think in ( hr . interest of n s t h ’p I hr, applicant Should not be punished for I lie fa.Hi which is not hers. Her house IS now unde, attachment The houseis residential if the applicant >ea I I v knew of wh a t was happening or wh a l wa s going to happen T do not think that she would have remained silent. T find that the applicant is not. the one to blame” (emphasis mine - this s a me Magistrate is the one before wh o m all Ihe substantive applications were prosecuted and who uave Ihe orders'). He did n o t end I here for he added I hat the power of attorney uiven to Ihe persons wh o put per l e d lo engage the various lawyers for Respondent was not registered in Tanzania . and that "in Ihe eves of the law. therefore, there is no power of Attorney. The purported power of Attorney in law can't- be acted noon. I so find' ! f— Apart from the fact thal the learned Resident M a o i s t . ate has been the very person before wh o m this case has proceeded tight from the slarl hence can’ I be heard to sav lhal "he was; ma d e to u n d e r s t a n d ..............." I hat the advocate;-, were laxv. f am s u . e lie is aware that advocates do not need that mslrument commonly known as "Power of attorney" in order to represent a party in f.ourt. The case started in 199** w i t t i advoeat e s : the aliened power of Attorney lo Pf TARKR EMMAtJUFlT. KANON! AMP W r i . F & E n f'H T 7.UM I was provided in late December 1996. Unless supported by evidence, which is non-existent . at least on record the trial magistrate 1! I ' l i j t u A 1I A f ji p - H A lii'.i |r;ij .j I - ;r{ r i : ,:( e i -ill: r I. ) < 1 . I I ) 11 ( [) IIII i j „l J [ [a put? 1111; ■. i i <i • 11. i i | 11 i i' j i> i iii | r 11■■>11 | 11> >| ii i rr. i , <j / | j im | i . i 1 i j(j i 11 •, j i |( 1 ( 1 1' " !| I Mill I Ii l •U : | <I j [i I I I I . I H II I i *tl! I I I I I I ■ ( I f |O H • .; | |I : lil| I [ X I H . X M ( 1 j Itlst.J Hi f i l l I'.- I < • ; { i I VI ~; H, s IIP ■>I I I I M j I I r*i p u I J. - X1 f 11 i I I ' d I •^ ■( I > j '■ 1111 i ( I ■■ 1 I | < i ' ; t' . ) >1 I [ s I i i | | t ' I; ( t i l l - ’ | 1 r *; ! H O (ill I p | , i,i[> II W l { M ^J.l.d.L i ;l1 i'! 'I t; 1J1’ ‘ '» I s ’; I : i ‘ {'"i I,!. nvio.A.piq [r r tiim / p rt p I I . ; 1I ! i f ■> U -> ljr.,j . - Ml I II; /. h b ! .) <> [ • >' N d o I i t-.M I ( K I V I ! A I J H I I feffcxj.' iv j 1' !I I H I J '->‘ 1 j A i ; I . )<>[ • : - l . /N, lif I i H io j A .. { I !<-> i - 11/ i: . ; !(( >, > .jq A h'HI S ;>H I p - . - » , , . o ; . l I ill.'.) :;i v, ; i ( | o tu.M j It's! A lit' |P A .| I a f |_ y , d | Hi - : r* jL'(M y.,M p / f u l 111 fe'.i u i; u I p U P p. - i ( U 1 ,1i i A [ [ f r i y [ | 11 [ I I I <»<} S H y ""I) |P q i (.><1 I } ] •( fMIUWSH • Al J [ H i I H U S I J> |OU p u p •'(/ j o i I HhJ.i no p up /, b \ I \ U o .1 tf 4 4 o [ H , Jrt>|OJa j i f u >; j .iwd SP A lj 11 >i ; i rm> ss 1 1 1 [ ) l P<i :if'« m u , ) l . - Hi |( - i l l ' pUP p . ; p . 1i r jik i J i.PMplcH U H [ j |«*a <■>11 |a i ’ 1 1 •>i j | Hij . i i . i 1 1 . i . H j i. i i i a i - i j .. i ■ 11 io , » h i 11 (> m i h i 11 j [ i iii [) mu s I >■ I .1 I . ■■ ) I< •>1 jIj ‘ > I I I I| . l l l [ > i < I <1 I I I S I I lI ' K I I iI j I II I i :•! I ' M I[. 1 I l [ M Kllll I| I | l|K II l [ I { I III j Irt S I I ' I UUP I ■" 1 ; I I I j i II ! I M V, I I I ) ' . , ) < K i [ H I S I I I il [ ) I I I 'I I II 111 I [ [ t' .) ow '; | • j »--![ i A [ Ut i ion [ /11 f j j m>.> in [ m [j ! u ; i y i |on I qM |iic>uiri[4 j y s !-■ l i l l I '■( I I j \; f 11 / [ l i t ! j t) III-' O I J ( ) -! i t ' M K ' ( O i l .1 I B M AcH|| A | J PU I- j x i I-I I jI 1I I N ‘ 11 I I j ■I i i , '11 ! I •I . i I . K i 111 ( I . , s; ( ,I M o O I ii I I I |X I I ’ 1-1 1 . ) 11 M OilHUM J I it II i H I . . . i > | I ' x i A | .1 - ; i io i / i ■A . j > |j |t i l | ; : : o I , i>' | [.»-.; i i| ix i l A l | rf l l -1 | : 111j 1111 -i 1 ■: , ! j , 1 11 ’ ; I : I- - I . I /<•■- I , ■; i j I | i 11 /V, ij, ii- i ii o I : j U I I - 1 . 11. i •, ii> i ll 1111( i , I ' A P I ll j I .t ■ | ‘: ; - )■: ; I . O . -■,■I , j I 1 1 I. I III. ju i f 11 . I I . 11 I I > Ii ■ vi i T I :o ■.' j ■ II f j vi I j j vi < i ‘( } j ■ . i . 1■ I; ; I t - -- I ! t j ■I i ; t ■• ' I - - I j r-i .J VI ; j j I I I j | It i::J1111 1 1 1 .J E\J i (I | .-I I E Vi 1 I ICl i < ji i j !:• i. • i - ' - . ui •j 11'| ’ I 11 i M - | i A f | > lyiiihrS n tj | m ‘j b \ v 1 \ 0 1. 11 ( i I'** i •• | • i I i -■* I 11; ! i ' I i - 1 I! : i - I S A [ 1 1 1 1; , 1! M I I I t ' l ( II l i p ; [i.ji i.i o » II o j I l . Hi l l i , I O j , ,I:. j (( j I. I j , ) I ; ; l I I, ) I UIU , I M I I S I ’ I . : I .1 I ) I ( XI ; v)( 11 I H I | AM ■I u! |n ; | pic:, i | , u?-.i | i ' [idji i A i U i i SUM .( j y|f[> c*lj4 m u .,J J on i |.ih ' [xjh-4 jfc- „ a . j 11 m | 11 j i.i i viMc.it i tt tl q | uu 4 u j. aaaM dM J I llrfAd •' I f i y ■ t)l,l I I f o i i i i f S I . - »( [ j [fljw q «S<U |«UO A 4 -1 ^ 0 y i{ 4 -I l l y S c J . J ( l r ) . J O j A j I 4 < X| |Ulr.' I I II I .I-Ij r»l[ I f t ) I 1I ' * >] I' | s ; I I ■ [IH()i|rj I I l;' l,j.) 1 1 S I M i d i ) |CI : ; s n | nit j n io. 1 11 i -,, i r... 1 1 1 ' 11 - | , o a i 1 1' 11 ( «>. x 1 , > A | 1 l ( x j 1 11 f ;-h 1 p 4 11014 4 1 M p,:<|,.l' AcMj t |l ' l | I I ( ;I I |I|.-||H || HI I 1y j I' j i l-:ji»l ( IJI 1 [ I vXI l P I I v( A l j q I.' t# [ a u u c i ( I.M j • ' i J } A i I p i >I ; *! I I I . 1 .1 I .IM I H t j |l| Vi , I !-;( Ivl I I ■ j <I I Uil p i I i I i. I 111 [in I t'rK K IP oip., i-i | 1 , i o a j i f v)i | | I j t- ' -| P i J j p tp • ; 11 lip --.t j 1 1 j : A [ I I I P | l i i . i |o i l H [ IIU .) d ) 1* n M i o i w j kh advoca t e ' k a i hi p >1d < .- is 1 ’■ ' ’ ole ■ i ! ! ena ' , .r n o n " - f1" I >-'l: : H.tv i n o foil' ‘ | tided ! ! i. i ! ! !i' > R e • i ,i • i !■! ■■1 1 ! ■ a •; I >! ! y i • ,i <> . * • • 1 1 * *1 1 I Jl Hfl S.I 1 1 ' (-.411 ’ I e s o a I >o ire •-■>,■! . , •f I. ! - i , i ! i , •! I ■1 I I I me b V ii I , ! ! h i ! b eh i lid F . '! 0 (>!' law o i I i i I a I ion i n 1.......................................................................... !•' 1.i ' o w, ■-v>o o 11 1 v w,i y (■ i .H-- n 1o In •i i I ,, . it n, ! v I , ■I i . ••! or a I i on <i I I be f o r in<< Htu>1 i e a I i o n s h e ••an s! ■1 I a i >r >1 lor <■!■1 o >h-mih •i •! <>f I i nn- w i i I• 1 n which I i > a l j I >I V I () :u •I, i ;■ : ; <I <■ I I if" ,) i in I '' s .) ! o r d e r ,i( IH I - ri >> [ 11I •, 1 11<1I I I: : i ( I tl I ! 11■I I ' f I ! M 1 I 11O 11 1 I 11., I I 1:, >! WO , H !| ) I o 1- I I ( >11 .,Oi> :•; i in i I . i r .t i u I I 11 <-* s a m e - I 11 , i I mi lav I I u • r . 1y ; i ><>11 , 11 •i , I \ 111 I . I not 11 ave F i ) f>d a r r Hsh ,ii)!)l i c a ! i o n bill Khuiili! have . - a n ! i e,l lo .p .-.I <>t p I he fl i Kin i S SPf l ^Dt'il in,--it i o n : t h a t I he R f-v; e i n d e n t is a i r t - wl v l i me bar <nil but c a n s I ill anplv for e 11 1a m 11 ■ in<■1 1 1 o f I i me w i l l , i n wh i i 1; lt> f i !<■ ,in a I >i >1 i ('a I i o n Io set . i s i <I ■> Mu' d i s in i s s a I o r , 1, • i (< f 1r; \ 1 \ n hw11i , •11 would be considered on ino i i I s Wl i i 1 e :•; t i l l on Mi ! s . I s i >o 11 I ,) ! 1 1r I 11 <■t <I t f >*: • I I Ii i I in I lie evRt i l . t Hp Ri'f-.noti'lp n I ilocidi-s to . mp I v f or on i ,-t r m-mien I o! I i inf-* within which to f i 1« ?»n a n i ) l ic.-il i o n l o .■■.ol nsiiic I Im d i s m i s s ' - a l o t d (■? t of I P. \ 1 7. \ ^ ft l h (-> ni.i 1 I (• r ■■I if 111 I d I !• ’ I ! •i nd 1>w I I >v . t no I 11111 M.1,1 i :;l i . 1 1 >* , f , nn t) r oiiii) I , I I o , ii v•, • I 11 •■•-<> <I i >o, •I ion I >>•<•• 111:;»1 of wl i a I if' on f i x' . 11 ;! - i ri lii--: r 1 1 I i 111 : I I u >i > i ; I (<n I M u ) i >:! t -1 ! <> o I >•-: o r v pd th^il Ino *»r ov i <m s ,-aT>ii! i o. r l i o n was " d i sni i ••,:.>-‘d! , o o o ! v J .-no1'' iI is inado 11 r i •](•! r d i f f «rf »n! n r o v is i o n s of I In-* I a >.•.•" hit! I !i i s i no! borno out ]»v I ho i o c o m ! - in I ns : own i<n 1o r d ii. a . v* i d.-> i ir-: I C i /p words, lin s i m n l v and l a i p fI v i nd i c a ’ I ha! i I wa s heina "dism isspd Tot want of m o s n e i it i on". The to was no ( I n h a l e nor d i f!CI)Kf; i n n i ruin I d i no IIs i ma i I s ot (d l a o w i s p whnto 1 Ikoi d i d lie q pI I hp above obsprval ion? Alio in 1 ho evcptid -iliisadv unoled wlipri d i s e n s s i mi Mi p issue of' I i in i I a I i o n ho recorded. " He r house is now undor a t t aohmenl The housp is residential" (emphasis m i n e i ............How d i d ho coi up lo 'Tii ii! 1 rul e on this when Mi i s wa s I ho verv cote of Mu' am>l i c a l i or i s which a p p l i ea I i o n s had no! b e e n h e a r d ' 7’ T h i s i s wha! •-.him I d have bnwi i n v e s t i aa t e d upon a s nor- P,. 4Rf 1 W e t a n d 0 , 7 1 R f>7 C P C , Wi t h a t •< 11 n * ' n : ; j t ) n H i p I ,1. I' i1 <I <■t ! h >u t r i - ! »-< I 11. f i ; ■-. • M I I M 111 « >* 11P 'S t M I <t | tip " t ) t > 1 i <' .4 I i < >11 ( >11 In (■ I I fk " v ( : i I i i ) *i ■i ' i I t p p 11 I P I I 11<-■' i i 'I I f I ■I I I P .-IS ;• p p m j 1111 1 v t 11 (•> 11*1t ■ I : i i >n 11 11 i - i ! I 1’ ■' 1 ! ■ I >•■>p n i i m ' i >* in his-; hi I M d In ()( d p r f 1 1 .-■> i . s i ' r. 1> 11 i in f i mhi 1 ii-■> i t it i I ' t ,-t111 i <■*<I ! i i .1 s I-' ' I i’ p v p 11 i ■: i ■** is n < 11 > ,in v s h r .l i .-i t >i > 1 t e a I in n I o i i t n r ■ pi i I ■(-• I <■i •t s ■ >H ■•■i M . ■>.; i i :■ i t I p w i ii■ rm riD R l i^nl i 11 r i s d i c t i <■ <n . T h p <v,urt H r - n in i t s w i s d o m w i l l c n n s i d f i r prt 1 r a f ^ n i p n o f I i hi p -tnd i f ci i . u d pd w i !I i f i ' - m - p 1i u m o p -md r .o t is i i l f l r I hp h i ,-i H p i w i t h i n I lip p I p .-h t) t i >v i s i i >i is o f I tip t a w / :•! 4P (1 ) ( e . ) . uti l n ,1 . Ri M p ’>7 ’’PC \ T h p 1 < >WP I C O D t I ■! f i i l l I i I u 1S H t P ,i •( •( 1 I I 1 i 11; J ' v :; >• If l S I ti t* . M i l l o r d p r s m ^d p in t p r m s i n d i c a t e d n b o v p . AT nAR EK HA 1. A A M i i. I' K t I i'i w v .i • :-7th kkptkm rer i qo7