hassan salum ahmed t a star butchery vs m s juphil general trading co ltd 2003 tzhc 23 13 june 2003
' 3K TFE ^ * ----- ^.e- T4N2:.ai*t^ a ; e i v i t ' o t o ? no... r 5 8 ,'c .t 2 0 0 3 rH4SSAN S4Xmyj ) ' ' ’ ' t/ „ S T ,R BDTCSSP.Y ) • • • • - . . •i.P F b Ie w V P L i I N T I F p V T:' -r u - M/S J U P H IL G ® A L ) - - ; t r a d in g CO* LT^ > > ^ ^ ? 0 H - ^ t T/ D S f S n d a n t ^ULZITQ. !?A T X , J , fV -...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- hassan salum ahmed t a star butchery vs m s juphil general trading co ltd 2003 tzhc 23 13 june 2003
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2003
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
' 3K TFE ^ * ----- ^.e- T4N2:.ai*t^ a ; e i v i t ' o t o ? no... r 5 8 ,'c .t 2 0 0 3 rH4SSAN S4Xmyj ) ' ' ’ ' t/ „ S T ,R BDTCSSP.Y ) • • • • - . . •i.P F b Ie w V P L i I N T I F p V T:' -r u - M/S J U P H IL G ® A L ) - - ; t r a d in g CO* LT^ > > ^ ^ ? 0 H - ^ t T/ D S f S n d a n t ^ULZITQ. !?A T X , J , fV - . ... • T h e A p p L ic q n -< r / P i^ iril|::I- -p-p - * « « ie d , su tt in tb is c o u * / ; S S ,n ^ “ med t / , S T « BUTCH^E, .fo r • O «,l,r ,tio a th ,t th e » „ *? ?** ^ o P o o d w t/ W e n d w t ' * . * . d e o l , re < 3 t h 9 r , nd w • f ” No- 1 0 7 6 ** * * * * * * M i„ i.n ^ eke : * f , OT koo“ n * • ■ „ f 0 c c a w t ! i ^ * 2 ^ . V f r ^ o o m p r i s e d ••so, {<ont.*r-* I d - . * , * * . , .. ..’ •' J l oss of in te r e s t « « * * « . ' A i o a 4 w ith ) t ^ e , ' - ^ ° 0 0 ' 0 0 0 * 000/ = <md , c w w : « w , ■• :V 3 JUH-5.lt. ^ * P r * ic a tio n . In t h4 ^ + . o o u o .,1 , W t i . » » » « . T t W W . * * ! * , * * . * » „ -T O w w a, fo r th e R esp on d en t. r„ '• P P o -.r e d W e , sought to , dopt ^ W n o d c o u n s e ls « W * W „ th e c o u n te i. J J o lie n t., , f f i d , v lts ,„ d W td & Zgg M r...-^ O G es^ o a o f t h 9 ^ ^ o , ;, , *±c > « f ^ ! : Ce he b o u '^ t- ; ; , th q t th e re •cJ«**ta -»-e*• ■■-j- *■ in c o m e - V--* * .• , now c o n i i t i u A n p - **-9 ^ b b a t o i r and g r o u n d s " ■^a g ':i o - ^ i s"f ^ f o r . '. f i n t e W ,~ ; ;- n , ° CcuP ^ t i o n i,- ... •-, 5 .-ocfr . ^ tc H e r itig C lim b e r r - / V S , t 0 '3 S U C . ■ ^ the r u i t a e : o ^ n n c i . ;:. ■_ ■• •■■ -■■ ■■-•■■■'- - i o ' i ; "" '■'/■.• r;-:, r : ^ , "' v: 1 Lo f: t f ,n , - *' 1J ' ■■■• ^ci; :i;; '*'■■” .loH V Q ea so;.-P •' - •■• * -.\; - r- : : xr "'' . . " ** ^ ' tVj . y '"■j'> f. '■.■Tirr-rn-- ■fi ^ ■ T O.T t»;,o ■' U' ^ f‘ ■ I C .. Oh the o t h e r hand Ms, R in go has ’ su bm itted Vthat t h e ’ R esp on d en t l a w f u l l y purchased th e -fiairta - tn.i %!xpiibXie.-ajai&felok.^J 8/1 2/£fikXl ^ b e re _ . b .p. ,emerged the h i g h e s t "bidder in a p u b li c a u c t i o n f l o a t e d by M . S v K . E * Auctioneers , on b e h a l f o f Ms T an zan ia P o s t a l Bank, t o whom th e farm •vj«c raot{Sjaged t o s e c u r e a loa n o f Eshs, •6 0 ,000,000/=« She su o m itte d tJsat t h i s Whs e x h i b i t e d i n : Annexure D2 o f th e vJritten C t ~ t o - .- s n t o f D e fe n c e .* She s a id ' i t * was1 n ot t i n e t h a t the A p p lic a n t d id n o t know t h a t th e farm had been s o ld as th e A p p l ic a n t had f i l e d in t h i s c o u r t C i v i l Case No, 8 o f 2002 a g a i n s t Tanzan ia P o a t a l Bank and M.K. Auc-tion&rs t o b l o c k thfe s a l e which • V ^ d ie v .is s e c ' by Byixesfri, J , He q ls b f i l e d a M is c e ll^ n e n o u s C i v i l a p p l i c a t i o n t o n u l l i f y - th e s a l e , 'fcbich 'ii*B a l s o d is m is s e d . She f i n a l l y su bm itted t h * * t ]th e A p p l i© * n t is l e g a l l y no l o n g e r ' the owner o f th e farm so' h e 1has n o t h in g to s u ffe r, i n s t e a d the Respondent stan ds t o s u f f e r im m ensely, * * In r e p l y Mr. Ukwonga, subm itted t h a t the Respondent has n o t © jK h ib ited a c e r t i f i c a t e o f s a l e t o sbef* t h a t he had l e g a l l y ' ' ■> p u rcb ^ s ed th e fatrai^,-,H^.submitted a l s o js.inp^,.the A u c t io n e r a p a r ty to a s u it in stitu £ e< | in th e High Court Bfrnk^ ,h i s 1 ..sboi^l.da,,be.. taken w ith .c a r e ^S, ^e? c o ^ ld be b i a s e d . ;Th.o le a r n e d c o u n s el ended b y u r g i n g ^ 0ur,ti .t0 f i n d t jia t t h e r e was no ;.sa le„ t h e r e f o r e t h a t ,not ^ "booafide p u rch a s er o f nth e fa rm . „ T h e r e f o r e , ^5-* submits h i s a p p l i c a t i o n should be g r a n t e d / . '- ■ * = ' - ' * ' • • ■ 1 ■ !■ -! si?1..?, f ^ c i p ^ s g o v e r n in g the ; : ^ t o f tem p ora ry i n ju n q ^ io n s j Well, s e t t l e d . P ^ rc b t q s r e nlust be 'a. ' s u i t ~±ij. q u e s ti^ / o , be t.,-,;,; o , t h e f ^ c ^ a l i e g e d V . and ° % ;^ e P l f i n t i f ; : w i l l .be e n t i t l e d ‘ t o . ijhe r e l i e f ( 6) * #1® C c u r t ' c i n t e r f e r ^ c e i s n e c e s s ^ t o iJ ?> th;G P l a i n t i f f ,from;;.i r r e p a r a b l e i n j u r y . . T h i r d l y on .th e re w i l l be ...g*e^t,e$ J a ^ s ^ ^ a t i d m is c h ie f s u ffe re d b y th e p l a i n t i f f f r o a w ith h o l d i n g o f t h e i n j u n c t i o n : tfriaA w i l l t ' b e s u ffe r - e d fro m t h e ^r^nti-fi'g''®^'--! ^ , ' '*s A3X& -Oarffe. fcut o m * i r a * a * f id a '£ ± t catfo rfh e t^ e r t h e in jusi*Sfi$h ffwrtx**;Jse>c - i r i b t h s ; ^ * ! ^ i ^ t e r ^ s t - . ( Cap WCC3M0H-AI^ .TONMQ&flMSBr J L = «M a & lA ^ 20 ;3I?(?S a i* ■ I'i: ■ . • ’■■ '>i 3 A T T IL IQ V MBOT'/S ( 19 £>9» TCP n.23*:-« TRUST T IN 3 AITI \ VS TAWSANtA CORFOR \TIOIT LTD. ( i 9 6 0 ) IL'CD* f t , 501 IBP.MUM V , NGAIZA (1 9 7 1 / HCD n .2 ^ 9 * T.A > KANGS V G^J ^R/.L K ?ITPGPP, MyRK COOPERATION UNION (1 9 8 4 ) LTD 1987 TLR 17 P'JIPPP GJP3R MARTCST V . B . F . TANZANIA -LTD (1 9 9 2 ) TLR 1989. X w i l l now p r o c e e d t o apiply j ‘ ocg p r i n c i p l e s in.. d e a l i n g w ith thft a p p l i c a t i o n b e f o r e mo. Tlioi-o i c o f cou rse, a s u it b e fo re th is c o u r t on a d i s p u t e o v e r farm Ho. 107 6 Mbagaln M i s s i o n , B a r es sa la a m . The A p p l i c a n t c la im s lie i s s till the la w fu l ow n er o f t h e farm-. The R esp on d en t a l l e g e s he b o u gh t t h e farm in a p u b lic a u c tio n on 8 ,1 2 .2 0 0 1 and t h a t th e A p p l i c a n t had @ file d a s u i t a g a i n s t t h e m o rtg a g e ^ n z a n d U P o s t a l Bank t o p r e v e n t th e s a l® b u t l o s t . Tbo A p p l i c a n t had a l s o file d an a p p lic a tio n fo r n u llific a tio n 03 A s a le but l o s t . The a p p l i c a n t i» re p ly , a d m its there was a c i v i l c a s e N o. 8 o f 2002 b e f o r e ^ h is c o u rt. He a l s o a d m i t s there :-;as an a p p l i c a t i o n to n u lify •fch.e s a l e . I n both cas®-s t h e ' A p p l i c a n t lo s t th e b a t t l e s . M r, Ultfr/,o.nga, su b m its th^t.^^this, ..sli oij.l.d n o t bo ta k en a..s f i n a l as t h e r e is now Eending bef ore - the Tanzania ..Court of Appeal, an "appeal ~iMm» 1 iii 1 1 — -■ -*-■ ^ ^ ^ > 1^,... ...... ... _... ^____________________________________________________________ 1 ir # ~ J* T h is. c m T ^ T s .'o O h 'S ~ v 5 e w i: ;S t a t e ^ ^ n r f r Q ^ toG b - r i s ' n o F e v i d e n c i .^ a t ' t h ^ r S T " ' y a n .a p p e a l. 1 p e n d in g ' i n t h e .. r*is © d in tiwa c o u n t e r a f f i d a v i t and th e A p p l i c a n t was a t l i b e r t y to f i l e ,,airep.ly- in*<^4©h. l i e ;coil.ld hav& draws* ibis- .-c'oai“fc**s a t t e n t i o n a p p e ^ l i ,. B©sidfes> t 1^ mere f*ci?v®dr aaEE% ^ t B A W p ^.rfcafceq 4 ®;-* sitnyt-Of e x e c u t i o n , Diftas 'Mft vfchat *•pKista ’ fa Q i© # Mftd wi th out 'p r e ju d g in g n $ u it b e f o r a ^ q t i^ r © p i s p w ? s ^ l o u s gwestison >to: be trie tf ^ t H e e r v the A p p l i c a n t ! ^ *ttje R espondent. if thej?e.c-w^s- any Stfcfe :. • * b' et weet i ^t h^ '. A p p li c a n t and th e i* Q .s * a . ;B * * k ttho § o l d th e p^oj>®rtT i M, j t :f o l l o w s p i a >niy l i t t l e l i k e l i h o o d o f ..the <ADp l t t o « i * p - l i , ;.v;t t h -***7 a j a C t t ^ d - ^ g . - ^ i t k e tma-in- s u i t - a g a in s t ctfi;© R©s»pohdent; ! b,-p/v- 0 j .. , - 1 C: 'T h is c o u r t i s a Use o f - t h e v i d t r '- t h a i on t h « r i m t e r i * ! b e f o r e ^ .• th e r e as. s u f f i o i e n t eviden ce th*>t te££®espondent k *s a ? : f ™ * a ubT.iLttedp.tha t, in tho n b s e Wo © ; - p ^ , q y b e i * t - t £ i ^ t e ‘^ f , & % !• © > i n , - . . l a « , ...................... P,;r 'l i ;;«■ .1 i b e r ■.-w* ^ trt-er^ t i o r? J -v: C; i'''T \%r inf He d id not c ite a n v authnr-i f v 4-" * — - J t - lc P re p o s itio n . But assum ing be wa s r e f e r r i n g t c r.9 2 of of t.o ,* • ^ -- ^ °* th e v i v x l Proced u re Code, would put seriou s d o .b ts on the a p p lica b ility of that ru le . F or th a tr u le r p f p r ^ tr. ~ i ^ . tSTS * ° ^ lBS ° ^ e r e d by courts through a t t a c h m e n t i n e x e c u t i o n o f d e c r e e s '" - Tn H « . . - • ±n t h e P r e s e n t case th e 1 8 ^ H e & e d l y made u n d e r a - o :o;r o f s , l p b y t h e A p p l i c a n t t o T a n S* n i - i s s ” ®d b v +Vlo , ' ' — t , l B ant a m a tte r n ot d is p u te d b y th e A p p lic a n t. O rder X X I ■••:•,. r.p r , " ~ iC d o e s n o t a p p l y w here H M ortgagee e x e r c is e s h ie ^ / 0 TT ------ “ ~' ~ ~“ ° _i 1 AL B W K OF ^Uim^h.CE V D 'R ES S " L A-.-'T/; r~w :T * 1 1 • ■ T W 2 7 H . --------------------^ I C S S T A T IO N 'B Y ( l 9 9 5 ) The Respondent h „ su b .ittec ,n .i t!le A p p lioan t does not d is p u te t h a t he has been in M cm , t < o » o f th e f ■ aOOl a f t e r the purchase. To^y ‘ i t 'V 311,08 OQCupation r l ! The b 1 f The b a l a n c e o f c o n v e n i e n c e is i„ 17 'nonth£i s i» « ® f , VOUI_ o f . . n o t U e x n g d i s t u r b e d , f t „ ra cS , , c „ _ .. T a im u 1 ^ -ou£ o c c u p a t i o n . T h e ^rml -i has s u b m itte d th ^ t ot-5 * **P P A lc*m t h e 1 8 l o c i « S o v e r 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 / = d a i l v T h i« t o ffle, th a t th e A p p l i c » n t i s ^ a n ™ s dam ans 9 w whn ii lie e t’ ' theT'G -^ nor ° P m b * * -ib y i^. — — * — ^ f r : : o ; : „ : ; i ; : : s t , Hank o r t h e / o o h V n n f -r ^ P ostal A p p l i c a n t T o r an;^ i t n p r o v e w n t s b e m ‘ f>,n • -l^ f n a ve m^de o n t n e la n d m d i s p u t e * th e r e s u l t ^tiri ■fnt t . . . ‘ “ noovo reasons I 0]f * O tm id 0 M -ri«W th n t th is WOU7 C- ^ 7 - fcO g r a n t an i^nj juunnccttiioo n n* t J , would t"h a r a ** f n ^ - ^ ° " Se * " “ b 1®^ -with, c o s t s . • d is m is s th e ^ p p l i o a t i o n O rder a c c o r d in g ly . ~^ s » A 4 MASSVTT JUr?GE 9/6/2003 R u lin g d e liv e r e d in ch ador« +t- 0 -i , . 1 b^ 3 !3 th cU y o r J u n e , ^ 0 0 3 xn the p re s e n c e of M r, L u -^ w * fo r T'-^ -n, - v, 0 q ~ I u * Ukwonga f o r t h e A p p l i c a n t Mrs a i n g o fo r th e — — a nt and t n e p a r t i e s i n person. 1 3/5/2003