valeram m vs republic 2004 tzhc 41 7 june 2004
( O r i g i n * t ib 'T f r o a G ri'H ,;,! O - s e . H o ; Q63 o f 2003 t i ^ s n _ . ? - J ^ i).„- D riv e * t Dn r ©0 3 * 7. - ^.!' . '3 v r *** A T v ? T .' 1 r AT T -*• - ------« * U < 1 i ’X # 1 .-. . 4 » »»•»?•••« * » * i # # . fl * V '~ v > T .v.o 11L v‘ T . -^ rm *r -•. ,., ^ - - '- • O >_> TH.i, UNlT.Jyi5...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- valeram m vs republic 2004 tzhc 41 7 june 2004
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2004
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
( O r i g i n * t ib 'T f r o a G ri'H ,;,! O - s e . H o ; Q63 o f 2003 t i ^ s n _ . ? - J ^ i).„- D riv e * t Dn r ©0 3 * 7. - ^.!' . '3 v r *** A T v ? T .' 1 r AT T -*• - ------« * U < 1 i ’X # 1 .-. . 4 » »»•»?•••« * » * i # # . fl * V '~ v > T .v.o 11L v‘ T . -^ rm *r -•. ,., ^ - - '- • O >_> TH.i, UNlT.Jyi5 .; i_,_...0 PJ$SPON7)“3TT y ") Ku-mxA, J . The q p p o ll^ a t a^rear^'- 4.^ J:c?', t. -Gx .ro tfao/Jesidont M * g i a ± r * t e o f D *r es „ t Solsoine U riv a on t o b ,r g e s h e et 0<*>fa.itHng e o u o t* o f M t M w r i a . ; t o 'TojKMantp n « i a s , Tha c « o la th e W , - O - n - t ^ l t e r t 0l -ir,tn »x C -so rubber 9«3 o f a o o 3. n ,e P ro c e e d in g s o f th e J.o„er c u r t t b , t *h a „ tha , p r e l l , n t <ipl?e*re0 b e f o r e tl-2 c a r t oo 15/10/2033 the t r i , l S e n io r < U « l . * r * t o n otoe « , . t to e focu sed person b o fo r e h=»r b „d p lea d e d g u i l t y t , th e f i - s t c ou n t. Tha l o , r „ od S e a lo r R a » id a » fc B » s l 3tr*iJ® then adjourned th e im t t o r to 23/10/2003 f o r h a « - t n g o f e v id e n c e on tho jsocoad „ » , t , c - 33/ i o / z :*>3 th e case « » ir ljw r n c d t o 25/11/2003 f o r m ention. Mo Te „«o Bl « » f o r 0 n 2 5 / l l / 2 0 , 3 ,) h l c , 5 » , S the d « t e s e t f o r th e e , » o to oc ■ e o t l ^ o d , tho p r o b a t i o n Withdrew the second count *»nr? nroce^d^d ^ o c o . u . r j to to irnv-' move tno cotart to gxvQ nn o r d e r o f 3osnoliti.cn rr ---- -► ii-s c o u r t o b l i g e d . Tbs o r ^ e r o f d o T i d l i t i o n did- not ,ro *>G- i «, ^ ,, , - t,ie a > , p o l l ^ a t and he p r e f e r r e d qti ap p ea l to t b i o c o u r t • M r, N g e lo s b i, a c t l a . ’ fo ~ *-.*~ *• t-g R1rp 1a«»r]+, xn.. *F P © * il t h a t t h e 1om©~* n , , . ^ ■, ~ ° ^ --c te - its e lf in not t*k in - th e a p p e l l a n t * s p l o * * y i Ba -, . • ^-.-io, lu ^rned S t » t e A tto r n o v *p p e **rin s f o r tho R e ^ iv - -:6 . - 4 _ sy.'^'>rt tho c o n v i c t i o n . 2 T h is was n o t s u r p r i s i n g ao , was .,.-arko-d d e p a r t u r e fv o n procedure on t a k i n g p l o a h an l a i d down i n S a c t i o n 228 of* t h e C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e - c t « J.f e V 9 r t n e r e w -.s a plo*» o f g u i l t y ». t h e tria l c r . i r t '-;as to r o c o rd the accused p erson 's plea p oooib lo in t h e words n e a r l y be 0808", Thic is p r m ^ : :\ri' C o c t i o n 2 2 8 ( 2 ) o f t he < J r i " l i n * l P r o c s ' l u r e /.ct,- doc ,c~oo ■c c o t l - o a l s o lays it down t h a t a f t e r r e Q o r d i n y t".;o ;/lea o f - g u i l t y , tno t r m l c o u rt s h a l l pr oc ee d to " qo nv ic 't f ~ o . a c c v s e d p e r s o n an- pass S©ataQ<jpS o r make an o r d e r a •■'•“ -•t .-.ip 9 u n l e s s t^ero sia ll a p p e a r t o b-© s u f f i c i e n t coo:, t- f'o cn B t^ry", -I n th®. " r e s m f c case there is no c o n v i c t lot: o o f oo c e c t o n c o b u t t h e r e is an ordor o f dem olition . TLis t r i a l c -rt a loo. us.od t he p a s t , ' 'g-^aommtr xti makino: a ro~or-~ ; cou rt record# I tnink ttiere is need t o r e c o r d t o o :. **CTt Since, accucjo ad ~- it to 1 s t c o u n t and was convicted f;r too ca~o wb'it' f o l l o w s is th e ard.er- f o r d o u l l i t d :;p!5. . Ta ke n as i t is, t a i c . r o a ^ r l i doos n o t make s e n s e . - It was Mr* N g e l e s h i who r.ado se n s e o f t h i s remark when hs rsvc^ls^ th?> t t h e r e wao _an- . o r i p i n a l C' u r t roc-oro i n Which p r o c e e d i n g s were r e c o r d e d * A p p o r e n t l y t o e or-1 -, i n a l r e c o r d " g o t m i s p l a c e d and a d u p l i c a t e file was ' pone3 . The Ij^ rn ed S e n i o r R e s i c i e a t lJapds t r a te> a p p e a r s t o h a v e " l i n k e d 5' the two j f i l a a V b e n e e t h e rea-srl: nado i n too d u pl x ca <oj f i l o * % h l s ' w ^ V l r r o n g , ' "ihcT l o - r n o d Hon'ior R e s i d e n t M ^ i s t r a t © _ ^S ou t^lhavs ta ke n the p l e a a f r e s h i n :tho ‘d u p l i c a t o record ' ""and p r o c e e d e d ' a s th e law r e c u i r e d ’, Since t h is "' w a s n o t done the proceedin gs in the-' l o ' j e r c o u r t a r e a n u llity . The p r o v e d i n gs o f t he l o mot co vr -i a r e cpjoooed and t o o dem olition, o r d e r 'wade* i s set ^ cido. ■'Poo. cape s’ o/ul'l he h e a r d de novo before a n o t h e r ®a,g.ie tr<*to o f eo .o p e t o a t -j u r i s d i c t i o n # - . • It is so., o r d e r p d , -• . D elivered , '“D«»ted t h i s 7 tli'. J un o, 2^' h,