republic vs mbuke do ndebile 2006 tzhc 203 26 october 2006
UT -1'ES HIGH CCIiii CP a^ToA>TIA a-A3caA (lab era R egistry) CTaME*^ SSSJlCfTS GASS >7C* 75 CF 2006 1B2 li^UHLIC ViiftSIB HBI3G d / c TTDlIBXLIu P E C O ii 3 3 P T G S 26 Tih V 2005 High CDict 3wssi~ns at Ifchsna Date 1 26/10/2006 Ocr am j Hen*. H0iD,o. Msiray, Judgor Mr* MULT?&£ibo as s i st.yd by He* Sr,chari a *...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- republic vs mbuke do ndebile 2006 tzhc 203 26 october 2006
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2006
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
UT -1'ES HIGH CCIiii CP a^ToA>TIA a-A3caA (lab era R egistry) CTaME*^ SSSJlCfTS GASS >7C* 75 CF 2006 1B2 li^UHLIC ViiftSIB HBI3G d / c TTDlIBXLIu P E C O ii 3 3 P T G S 26 Tih V 2005 High CDict 3wssi~ns at Ifchsna Date 1 26/10/2006 Ocr am j Hen*. H0iD,o. Msiray, Judgor Mr* MULT?&£ibo as s i st.yd by He* Sr,chari a * state *.t+cErnGy far the Republic, Accusal (nanG) -jc Kbuko d /o ®dc>bilo ) is present undar custaly and represented by Mr* Kayagat AdLvccato* Iniorpi’ ctor Mrs* 1TC Ohangslr, Hh^Lich intc Kis-wahili end v ie s v t r s c.r ITotico c.f -isinl n infrrna*i.i:n foe raurdur contrary n,c socrti;n 1% c f the Pana! Ocdu was duly cerved m thu accucodj now before v-ho Cour t ;n 26/ 1 0/2006* I n f a r n a t i :n i a ro a d ov er and e x p la in e d i c t.ho accustid in her c*pi lc n g u a g * end she i s r oq u ir cjd t o p lo a d th cr ate* P lc a j I t i s n^t trua* 3a o f "net. ;j u i l t y n to the chargc* Ijhtsrod ac a p i< &+3* 1-GXxiii.T J 'JL/Gii» My Lord, I w ill lik e tc inform the Court that the •ftopublicr ia no lender interested tc prosecute the ?ccu 3 Gdr In terms of scc-l.icn 9 l ( l ) Criminal Kcocudurc Ac”iivj 19^5# I on tor ndLlo prosequi in •\ds case* H .B .3 , H3IR£r JUDGi) 26/10/2006 SEt. 5i> FTtr L j£/ "c r d , X havo no objection * I-J3HUY JUDGtt 26/10/2006 cap iR i ‘l'lio D rr b e h a l f o f the I t o p u b lic h a v in g e n t ^ o d n oL lo p r o e o q iii in to n a s o f 3 e c \ ic n 9 l ( l ) "toe C rim inal K roccd u rs A c t, 19^5, t h i s Court h orob y d is c h a r g e th e a ccu se d Mbuk*j d / o -T d ob ils o f the c lm ’ ^od o f f e n c e * ‘i lio a ccu se d has been in fc r n o d th a t th o d is c h a r g e i s n o t a b ar su b sequ en t p r o c e e d in g s b a sed cn th e same f a c t s * >r -vV^VVi)' : V;■ 1 t! ii r T / ii.k o 1-SIRAX JUDG13 26/ 1 0/2006