geofrey mwanjoka vs jeremiah george mwanjoka administrator of the estate of the late joyce stanley sichome 2022 tzhc 12312 31 august 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 158 OF 2022 (Originating from Probate and Administration Cause No. 77 of 2020 of the High Court of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam District Registry, at Dar es Salaam dated on 17th November,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- geofrey mwanjoka vs jeremiah george mwanjoka administrator of the estate of the late joyce stanley sichome 2022 tzhc 12312 31 august 2022
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2022
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
No structured case brief is available yet for this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 158 OF 2022 (Originating from Probate and Administration Cause No. 77 of 2020 of the High Court of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam District Registry, at Dar es Salaam dated on 17th November, 2020 before Hon. L.M. Macha, J.) GEOFREY MWANJOKA............................................................. APPLICANT VERSUS JEREMIAH GEOFREY MWANJOKA ( As Administrator Of the Estate of the Late JOYCE STANLEY SICHONE)........... RESPONDENT RULING MRUMA, J, Prayer to withdraw the Application is rejected. As the Respondent has successfully raised a preliminary objection, permitting the Applicant to withdraw his application, will amount to pre- empting the preliminary objection. The appropriate remedy in a circumstance like this is to strike out the application. Regarding costs, taking into account the fact that this matter is between a father and his son who are bathing on two different status that is to say, a father fighting for what he considers to be his rights in the i estate of his former wife, and a son fighting for what he considers to be his right over the estate of his mother, I would think that awarding costs would simply escalate their differences and free hatred between a father and his sons, accordingly I order that each party should bear own costs. In summary therefore it is ordered that Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 158 of 2022 be struck out with no orders as to costs. A. R. Mruma Judge 31/8/2022 2