19921009 TZHC Dar es Salaam

19921009 TZHC Dar es Salaam

The cross-petition is premature and incompetent for non-compliance with the mandatory requirement to refer matrimonial disputes to a Conciliatory Board under section 101 of the Marriage Act, as none of the statutory exceptions apply.

Citation
19921009 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Parties
Petitioner: Siegfried Ulrichberger; Respondent: Celina Daudi Michaeliswer
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
9 October 1992
Procedural Posture
Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Judgment on Cross Petition
Outcome
cross-petition struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Divorce, Matrimonial Property, Custody, Procedural Compliance
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Siegfried Ulrichberger

Petitioner

Celina Daudi Michaeliswer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce and Ancillary Relief / Judgment on Cross Petition

  1. 1 Whether the cross-petition for divorce is competent without reference to a Conciliatory Board as required by section 101 of the Marriage Act

Ratio Decidendi

The cross-petition is premature and incompetent for non-compliance with the mandatory requirement to refer matrimonial disputes to a Conciliatory Board under section 101 of the Marriage Act, as none of the statutory exceptions apply.

Court Disposition

cross-petition struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The respondent's cross-petition is struck out without costs.