celina jacob mollel vs samson elias and another 2020 tzhc 2271 28 august 2020
The trial Tribunal erred by failing to properly evaluate the evidence, not visiting the locus in quo, and not reading assessors' opinions to the parties as required by law. These procedural irregularities rendered the decision unsafe, necessitating a retrial.
- Citation
- celina jacob mollel vs samson elias and another 2020 tzhc 2271 28 august 2020
- Parties
- Appellant: Celina Jacob @Mollel; Respondent: Samson Elias; Respondent: Magreth Numa @Gwandu
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / First Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Ownership of Land, Adverse Possession, Evaluation of Evidence, Procedural Irregularity, Limitation Period
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Celina Jacob @Mollel
Appellant
Samson Elias
Respondent
Magreth Numa @Gwandu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / First Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial Tribunal erred in holding that the appellant failed to prove the extent and size of the land in dispute
- 2 Whether the Tribunal properly evaluated the evidence on record
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by not reading assessors' opinions to the parties
Ratio Decidendi
The trial Tribunal erred by failing to properly evaluate the evidence, not visiting the locus in quo, and not reading assessors' opinions to the parties as required by law. These procedural irregularities rendered the decision unsafe, necessitating a retrial.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; retrial ordered
Orders
- Parties restored to their pre-Trial Tribunal positions
- Liberty to institute fresh proceedings before a differently constituted Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment