centre for the independence of judges and lawyers v yugoslavia communication 3 of 1988 1988 achpr 3 26 october 1988

centre for the independence of judges and lawyers v yugoslavia communication 3 of 1988 1988 achpr 3 26 october 1988

The communication was declared inadmissible because Yugoslavia is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
centre for the independence of judges and lawyers v yugoslavia communication 3 of 1988 1988 achpr 3 26 october 1988
Parties
Applicant: Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers; Respondent: Yugoslavia
Court
ACHPR
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
26 October 1988
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility
Outcome
communication inadmissible
Legal Topics
Right to Practice a Profession, Admissibility of Communication
Source Language
en
Human Rights Law Right to Practice a Profession Admissibility of Communication

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers

Applicant

Yugoslavia

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Communication / Admissibility

  1. 1 Whether the communication is admissible against a state not party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

Ratio Decidendi

The communication was declared inadmissible because Yugoslavia is not a party to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights.

Court Disposition

communication inadmissible