chama cha msingi mshikamano vs azizi hakika katani 2023 tzhc 16228 22 march 2023

chama cha msingi mshikamano vs azizi hakika katani 2023 tzhc 16228 22 march 2023

The delay was technical, arising from a misconception regarding procedural requirements, and both parties contributed to the situation. The applicant is entitled to extension of time in the interests of justice, despite not accounting for each day of delay, due to the peculiar circumstances of the case.

Citation
chama cha msingi mshikamano vs azizi hakika katani 2023 tzhc 16228 22 march 2023
Parties
Applicant: Chama Cha Msingi Mshikamano; Respondent: Ami Hakika Katani
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals From Primary Courts, Technical Delay, Good Cause for Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chama Cha Msingi Mshikamano

Applicant

Ami Hakika Katani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal against the District Court's decision
  2. 2 Whether technical delay constitutes good cause for extension of time
  3. 3 Whether the applicant accounted for each day of delay

Ratio Decidendi

The delay was technical, arising from a misconception regarding procedural requirements, and both parties contributed to the situation. The applicant is entitled to extension of time in the interests of justice, despite not accounting for each day of delay, due to the peculiar circumstances of the case.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant granted thirty (30) days from the date of ruling to file the intended appeal
  • Costs to be in the main cause