Charles Gidanyesh

Charles Gidanyesh

The application is res judicata because the issue of limitation of time has already been determined by the High Court in previous proceedings between the same parties; therefore, the present application cannot be entertained.

Citation
Charles Gidanyesh
Parties
Applicant: Charles Gidanyesh; 1st Respondent: Hanot Gidamurjang; 2nd Respondent: Paulina Charles
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Out of Time an Application for Certificate on Point of Law
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Res Judicata, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Charles Gidanyesh

Applicant

Hanot Gidamurjang

1st Respondent

Paulina Charles

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to File Out of Time an Application for Certificate on Point of Law

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can entertain an application for extension of time after the issue of limitation has already been determined between the same parties

Ratio Decidendi

The application is res judicata because the issue of limitation of time has already been determined by the High Court in previous proceedings between the same parties; therefore, the present application cannot be entertained.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed as res judicata
  • Costs awarded to respondents