charles gidanyesh vs hanot gidamurjang another 2024 tzhc 388 9 february 2024
The application was time barred because, although filed online within time, the payment of filing fees was made after the expiry of the prescribed period, and the law requires payment of fees to complete filing.
- Citation
- charles gidanyesh vs hanot gidamurjang another 2024 tzhc 388 9 february 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Gidanyesh; 1st Respondent: Hanot Gidamurjang; 2nd Respondent: Paulina Charles
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 9 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- application struck out as time barred with costs
- Legal Topics
- Time Limitation, Electronic Filing, Leave to Appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Gidanyesh
Applicant
Hanot Gidamurjang
1st Respondent
Paulina Charles
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is time barred under the applicable rules
Ratio Decidendi
The application was time barred because, although filed online within time, the payment of filing fees was made after the expiry of the prescribed period, and the law requires payment of fees to complete filing.
Court Disposition
application struck out as time barred with costs
Orders
- The application is struck out for being time barred.
- Order as to costs against the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment